- Joined
- Sep 17, 2014
- Messages
- 5,440
- Reaction score
- 2,923
Good luck to all the new grads.
Just like Sears buying Kmart. These so called smart MBAs running corporate are truly idiots. In past 5 years both Wags and CVS stock are trading at half what they used to be. Wags will get bought out but will it be private or public and will they want their retail space or just the scripts.
Rite Aid bought Eckerd and went in deep trouble coz most stores are sh1t. Rite Aid was bag holding sh1t stores for well over a decade.
Walgreens bought half of Rite Aid stores and took on a lot of debt as well. Now, it's Walgreen turn.
All that debt got us under performing Rite Aid stores, a worthless UK Pharmacy chain that had had zero or negative growth every quarter that I've seen, and $10+ billion of share buy backs when we were at 100-150% current share price. So i wouldnt say it got us nothing. It actually got us less than nothing.There's nothing particularly wrong about Walgreens the business, this is the consequence of having a investment bank debt load the business.
Walgreens Long Term Debt 2010-2024 | WBA
Walgreens long term debt from 2010 to 2024. Long term debt can be defined as the sum of all long term debt fields. <ul style='margin-top:10px;'> <li>Walgreens long term debt for the quarter ending November 30, 2024 was •$7.611B•, a •0.34% increase•...www.macrotrends.net
156%? Someone's interesting in looting the hell out of the company's equity. And this is BEFORE COVID hit.
Are they? They are the one walking away with millions from all this. It's the assumption that their decisions should be good for business in the long term that's the incorrect. I'd say it's exceedingly rare to find a corporate exec nowadays whose true planning horizons exceed 1,5 years. Sometimes it's barely 2-3 quarters, and then either they will be gone, or the business will be sold, or something will conveniently happen in the market that will get blamed for the sorry circumstances company finds themselves. Meanwhile, they personally will have made a lot of money.These so called smart MBAs running corporate are truly idiots.
I have said that too about corporate being myopic and the next quarter is all that matters. I wonder when they applied for the job and got the standard question of "Where do you see yourself in 5 years?" I guess they now say working for someone else.Are they? They are the one walking away with millions from all this. It's the assumption that their decisions should be good for business in the long term that's the incorrect. I'd say it's exceedingly rare to find a corporate exec nowadays whose true planning horizons exceed 1,5 years. Sometimes it's barely 2-3 quarters, and then either they will be gone, or the business will be sold, or something will conveniently happen in the market that will get blamed for the sorry circumstances company finds themselves. Meanwhile, they personally will have made a lot of money.
It’s happening everywhere. Banking, swe. Bankers and software engineers, now pharmacy. They fire you and make you make you take less pay. Same mba probably changed companies.Just like Sears buying Kmart. These so called smart MBAs running corporate are truly idiots. In past 5 years both Wags and CVS stock are trading at half what they used to be. Wags will get bought out but will it be private or public and will they want their retail space or just the scripts.
If anyone actually answers that question literally, and the interviewer accepts the answer and hires that person, those two richly deserve each other.I wonder when they applied for the job and got the standard question of "Where do you see yourself in 5 years?"