Wanting to switch from PGY-3 Psych

Started by will96
This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
Get help with your application

Use all the free resources available to you from SDN: articles, guides, expert advising, forums discussions, and school research.

Yes, absolutely. And don’t get use started regarding out of the OR anesthesia requests.
Please, let it out, we are all ears

Share the wisdom so future med students stumbling on this thread while researching their specialty choice 20 years from now can benefit from it.
 
I get that anesth is relatively higher risk than psych but if you look at the data, blood curdling complications are EXTREMELY rare plus how come you still feel stressed doing this as a seasoned attending? dont you reach a point where you've seen it all and everything becomes a boring routine?

Come on man, of the specialties in the salary range of anesthesiology, it is one of the best in terms of stress/complications (barring very few exceptions)
I get where you're coming from, but simply noting that complications resulting in objectively life-altering financial judgments against us are rare, overlooks the frequent overall poor outcomes in patients we take care of.

With time and experience we get better at managing risk, but the risk is still there. And there's more to "risk" than just counting sentinel events or closed claims.
 
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
I get where you're coming from, but simply noting that complications resulting in objectively life-altering financial judgments against us are rare, overlooks the frequent overall poor outcomes in patients we take care of.

With time and experience we get better at managing risk, but the risk is still there. And there's more to "risk" than just counting sentinel events or closed claims.
Aren't the outcomes mainly a problem for the surgeon? what else constitutes "risk"?
 
Aren't the outcomes mainly a problem for the surgeon? what else constitutes "risk"?
Imagine a case where you encounter unanticipated life threatening bleeding. Patient goes to the icu intubated, eventually extubated, neurocognitively just isn’t the same. Sues, they find low blood pressure in the record around the time of bleeding and they find an expert to say that’s the cause, you didn’t resuscitate well enough-settlement

Imagine a surgeon takes 7 hrs for a hysterectomy. Patient wakes up with an ulnar neuropathy- anesthesiologist is responsible for upper body positioning, you are sued. Doesn’t matter the surgeon sucks.

Imagine you do a nerve block and the surgeon injures a nerve, surprise your nerve block is blamed. Or maybe that surgeon is slow and you are doing a 4hr mac case with the table turned and there is an airway issue. Wouldn’t have been a problem if they were quick, but you are blamed.

Imagine a spine case where the bp goes low for 20 minutes before it’s fixed by the crna, patient has incontinence or paralysis issues, you are sued for not perfusing well enough. Doesn’t matter you weren’t in the room, doesn’t matter if the surgeon was at fault.

These were just off the top of my head. There are infinite examples we take on risk just by signing the chart.
 
Imagine a case where you encounter unanticipated life threatening bleeding. Patient goes to the icu intubated, eventually extubated, neurocognitively just isn’t the same. Sues, they find low blood pressure in the record around the time of bleeding and they find an expert to say that’s the cause, you didn’t resuscitate well enough-settlement

Imagine a surgeon takes 7 hrs for a hysterectomy. Patient wakes up with an ulnar neuropathy- anesthesiologist is responsible for upper body positioning, you are sued. Doesn’t matter the surgeon sucks.

Imagine you do a nerve block and the surgeon injures a nerve, surprise your nerve block is blamed. Or maybe that surgeon is slow and you are doing a 4hr mac case with the table turned and there is an airway issue. Wouldn’t have been a problem if they were quick, but you are blamed.

Imagine a spine case where the bp goes low for 20 minutes before it’s fixed by the crna, patient has incontinence or paralysis issues, you are sued for not perfusing well enough. Doesn’t matter you weren’t in the room, doesn’t matter if the surgeon was at fault.

These were just off the top of my head. There are infinite examples we take on risk just by signing the chart.
That's why our malpractice rates are 3 X that of a solo CRNA. Do you think the CRNAs are 3 x safer? We get paid on average 50-90% more per hour than a CRNA (supervised CRNA) for a variety of reasons one of them being we take the blame.
 
Last edited:
Good point, I hadn-t thought about that and it does sound horrific but would you say the job is still stressful even after acquiring many years of experience

I mean, you must have been through surgeons nicking arteries and getting non-ideal for anesthesia pts for many years now plus you get an extra 200k in the bank for it

No matter how many times you’ve been through these situation they are still stressful
 
I get that anesth is relatively higher risk than psych but if you look at the data, blood curdling complications are EXTREMELY rare plus how come you still feel stressed doing this as a seasoned attending? dont you reach a point where you've seen it all and everything becomes a boring routine?

Come on man, of the specialties in the salary range of anesthesiology, it is one of the best in terms of stress/complications (barring very few exceptions)
There is no comparison between the stress and risk level of Psych vs Anesthesiology- they are miles apart. Every year our patients get sicker, fatter and older while wanting more procedures under anesthesia. Every year more "out of Operating room" procedures are performed on these patients. Every year more patients are brought to the ASC that just ten years ago would have gone to the hospital.

Our technology has increased to compensate somewhat for these "riskier" patients but by no means have stress levels decreased if you are involved in the care of such patients. Any bad outcome (of which some are to be expected in a high risk group) will most likely involve the Anesthesiologist regardless of where the actual blame lies (even if there is any blame). We are an outcome driven society which means if there was a bad outcome someone or some group must be at fault.

One last thing is I love boring and routine because "exciting things" still happen way too often for my taste. The odds are you will most likely be sued at least once in your career (20+ years) as an Anesthesiologist regardless of whether you were at fault. Even the most meritless lawsuit will drain you mentally and takes its toll. There are no "good" lawsuits if you are named as a defendant.
 
There is no comparison between the stress and risk level of Psych vs Anesthesiology- they are miles apart. Every year our patients get sicker, fatter and older while wanting more procedures under anesthesia. Every year more "out of Operating room" procedures are performed on these patients. Every year more patients are brought to the ASC that just ten years ago would have gone to the hospital.

Our technology has increased to compensate somewhat for these "riskier" patients but by no means have stress levels decreased if you are involved in the care of such patients. Any bad outcome (of which some are to be expected in a high risk group) will most likely involve the Anesthesiologist regardless of where the actual blame lies (even if there is any blame). We are an outcome driven society which means if there was a bad outcome someone or some group must be at fault.

One last thing is I love boring and routine because "exciting things" still happen way too often for my taste. The odds are you will most likely be sued at least once in your career (20+ years) as an Anesthesiologist regardless of whether you were at fault. Even the most meritless lawsuit will drain you mentally and takes its toll. There are no "good" lawsuits if you are named as a defendant.
All very good points, I remember reading your posts here decades ago way back when I was a boy, you have been both in the field and on these forums probably longer than anyone else, respect.

You have also probably dissuaded more med students from the field of anesthesiology via your posts here than anyone else too 😛
 
We get paid on average 50-90% more per hour than a CRNA (supervised CRNA) for a variety of reasons one of them being we take the blame.
I think that # is closer to 25-30% more.

CRNA locum rates easily 250-300 an hour. MD locum rates 350-400..

Again, we are underpaid for the risk and liability we assume.
 
Good point, I hadn-t thought about that and it does sound horrific but would you say the job is still stressful even after acquiring many years of experience

I mean, you must have been through surgeons nicking arteries and getting non-ideal for anesthesia pts for many years now plus you get an extra 200k in the bank for it
I would say I have a level of comfort where most days feel fine and on average the stress is low, though there is a constant tension (let's call it "vigilance") that never allows you to fully let your guard down, as any of that crap above that happens can happen at any time, including during the most straightforward surgeries on the healthiest of patients, where a bad outcome is completely unexpected. (Sorry, that was a really long sentence) There is a reason people describe anesthesia as "95% boredom and 5% sheer terror." Boring days are always welcomed.

Additionally, my threshold for what stresses me out has increased overtime. There is a certain amount tolerance that builds up. But that doesn't mean the stress isn't felt and doesn't mean it doesn't have physiologic consequences on our bodies.

The fact is, the stress is ever present and at times is exceptionally high. The insults to circadian rhythm are not helping either. While truly terrible outcomes ARE rare, it's not because bad things don't happen. It's because we legitimately save people MOST of the time when those bad things happen.
 
All very good points, I remember reading your posts here decades ago way back when I was a boy, you have been both in the field and on these forums probably longer than anyone else, respect.

You have also probably dissuaded more med students from the field of anesthesiology via your posts here than anyone else too 😛
My Med school roommate and classmate went into Psych. While I earned more money than him year after year he did quite well peaking around $475k. He recently retired after decades in practice but still sees patients from his basement via Zoom. His professional income during retirement is currently $250K and he expects at least another decade plus seeing patients. My point is in his field he can work from home until age 75-80 well beyond my expiration date as an anesthesiologist not mention he hasn't taken any call in many years. Whatever field you choose make the most out of it.
 
Bro please stick with psych. I know so many people who have left pain altogether and got back to doing exclusive anesthesia. I don't know why you think you'd be so much happier doing pain. I know a lot of buddies in psych and as attendings are so happy. Great money, extremely low stress, high demand, bankers hours. Honestly please reconsider this.
 
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
Bro please stick with psych. I know so many people who have left pain altogether and got back to doing exclusive anesthesia. I don't know why you think you'd be so much happier doing pain. I know a lot of buddies in psych and as attendings are so happy. Great money, extremely low stress, high demand, bankers hours. Honestly please reconsider this.
You really think so? What you said about psych I think is mostly true for pain. Except you can do procedures which is one of the things I miss. It's just 1 extra year.