Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
Anesthesiology is the practice of medicine. Anesthesiology is also the practice of nursing. That is not the opinion of a few CRNAs; that is the law. The fact that anesthesiology is also the practice of nursing doesn't make it any less of a medical specialty. Unfortunately, many of you do not see how having yet another non-MD become proficient in a medical specialty can be counter productive. When pts consistently see that different factions of non-MDs are often "hands on" providers of their anesthesia, they will think that is the norm. You want it to be a medical specialty, but you will support ANOTHER non-MD provider to practice your specialty (in the real world, with very little, if any, supervision). We have to remember that MDs do not define what constitutes the practice of "nursing". Its a hard pill to swallow, but I got it down a long time ago. The sooner you swallow it, the less concerned you will be. Lets just do whats best for the patient. So if you whole-heartedly believe pts are in jeopardy under care from CRNAs practicing independently in rural America, what are YOU going to do about? Who is going to personally see to it that each CRNA in rural America is practicing under the supervision of an anesthesiologist? Therein, lies the difference between AAs and CRNAs. I dont agree or disagree with that, but its the truth. I respect AAs, but fair is fair.
Anesthesiology is a medical specialty, nurse anesthesia is what CRNA's learn and do.
Nurse anesthesia is a set of practical teachings that allow a nurse to administer main stream anesthesia.
