The state school I'm interviewing at has asked before, "discuss any apprehensions or concerns you have about this school."
This seems like a trap. I don't think I should say "Theres no problems at all its perfect and i love it" because it seems like im ignorant/unaware of reality. But I'm also afraid to bring up legitimate institutional problems like state budget cuts, lots of students not enough staff, administrative apathy, teachers aren't tenured and paid part time, budget used for infrastructure instead of towards staff/tuition assistance.
If I do bring up these issues I'd of course acknowledge that they are issues affecting almost every college in America and Canada, and that the pros of this school outweighs the cons etc
But should I bring this stuff up or is there a tactful way to answer this?
Thanks!
This seems like a trap. I don't think I should say "Theres no problems at all its perfect and i love it" because it seems like im ignorant/unaware of reality. But I'm also afraid to bring up legitimate institutional problems like state budget cuts, lots of students not enough staff, administrative apathy, teachers aren't tenured and paid part time, budget used for infrastructure instead of towards staff/tuition assistance.
If I do bring up these issues I'd of course acknowledge that they are issues affecting almost every college in America and Canada, and that the pros of this school outweighs the cons etc
But should I bring this stuff up or is there a tactful way to answer this?
Thanks!