1. no you did not say that dairy sales go to beef farms...you said that dairy is supporting the farm industry anyways, so what's the difference?
2. I don't think that they should get a pat on the back for "overall reduction of animal suffering". 3. Being a beefer isn't a great life, but its not that bad. And its a hell of a lot better than being a chicken. 4. I don't see where the suffering is - 5. all i see is that if someone did not eventually eat that cow, it would not exist. It never would have existed - cows are only around because people raise them - in the wild left to their own devices, they'd go extinct.
6. Now a chicken - that chicken suffers in that cage. And that veal cow - it suffers too. As does the force-fed goose. THOSE are the animal welfare issues that our vegetarian should be taking issue with. 7. No, instead our poorly informed Sally thinks she's doing some good by putting a farm out of business because she's taking the high road and not eating meat that came from a "suffering" animal.
You want to be a morally superior person, cut out veal and goose liver and eat only home-grown eggs. 8. You buy them in a store, you're no better than any other meat-eating person.
1. Erm, no. That's not what I said or implied. Most animal farming can be equated with suffering on some level, however mild, and if you support animal farming by eating animal products, you support some level of animal suffering. If you eat fewer animal products you are less of a supporter of animal suffering. Vegetarians eat fewer animal products than carnivores. Vegans eat less than vegetarians. The difference lies in HOW MUCH.
2. No? I think that making a major lifestyle change to support something you believe in should be commended, even if you cannot perfectly embody your principles. Should you be commended for driving a Prius and using energy-efficient light bulbs? I mean, you're no ****ing saint, but you are making a difference -- and that is good. You could do better, but some is better than none.
And if you're concerned about who is getting pats on the back -- keeping eating your burgers, but buy local, free-range eggs and I'll give you a big pat on the back -- just like I would give to a vegetarian who doesn't eat meat, and buys those same free-range eggs.
3. You're right about chickens. Unless you're granny's pet layer, your life as an egg layer or broiler is pretty much chicken ****. Unlike the meat eater who eats factory chickens and eggs. The vegetarian only eats the factory eggs -- not ideal, but less suffering
4. TRULY free range beef? Pretty durn happy. Steers in big-ass feedlots eating corn and silage and standing on concrete? No so happy. Please don't pretend like beef cows never suffer - esp if you're destined for kosher beef. Sure TG is awesome, and cows are much better off than they were. But a life in a feedlot followed by slaughter is not as hunky dory as you make it sound. I agree -- there are gradations of animal suffering. TG and humane slaughter make things better, but do not completely eliminate suffering.
5. This argument gets pretty absurd if you follow it out to its logical conclusion. If extinction of cows is bad because it means those cows are not getting to live fun and rewarding lives until they get slaughtered, think off all the potential lives Americans are squelching by using birth control! You could have had like 5 babies by now! They could all be eating candy and living wonderful happy lives! Think of all the potential happiness you have squashed! Absurd to think in those terms, no?
Nonexistence does not equal suffering.
6. They usually do. Most veggies I know are concerned with eating local, truly free-range animal products.
7. Riiiiight. Changing behaviors is bad if it puts someone out of business. Crime = jobs for cops.
8. Correct -- a veggie is not BETTER than a meat eating person, but they cause less suffering than a meat eater who buys the same eggs AND a nice fat broiler chicken.
You know, I've heard far fewer obnoxiously righteous vegetarians than I've heard people complaining about them. Sometimes I think carnivores get on the defensive, and perceive what might be a simple explanation of the reasoning behind a veggie diet as an attack on their character.
I'm sorry if you feel like I'm judging meat eaters. I'm not. In fact, I'm very pro-meat in places like Botswana (too much trouble to irrigate for crops, goats can eat scrub, people can eat goats). But I think meat eaters should be able to honestly introspect without getting defensive. $hit, I'm no animal welfare saint -- I still occasionally eat some dairy and eggs -- free-range expensive stuff from WF that is probably the "fake" free range kind anyways, eggs from local farm when I can. No one is a saint -- we're all trying to make this a world we'd like to live in -- some people by being veggie, some by giving to charity, some by working on human rights issues. People aren't BETTER than each other for the choices they make. That doesn't mean there aren't bad choices, good choices, and better choices.