Sanman,
Just be careful of not falling into the same trap as 4410 frequently initiates (i.e. generalizing his understanding of policies and practices onto the broader field). School psych training at the PhD level can vary quite substantially from program to program. Many are, it is true, psychoeducational focused and provide limited training into psychiatric illness or the broader clinical field. However, there are many school psych programs that are more akin to child-clinical programs in their breath and scope of training. Check out examples from the school psychology programs at:
Tulane University -
http://psych.tulane.edu/graduate/School/Aboutourprogram.htm
South Carolina -
http://www.psych.sc.edu/grad_psycsch/schprog.html
UT Austin -
http://www.edb.utexas.edu/education/departments/edp/doctoral/sp/
{Wow, that paragraph is just all kinds of wrong. Most, if not all, PhDs and some PsyDs do get specialized training before they get licensed. Many programs, mine included, have advanced study areas (mine were neuropsych and behavioral medicine) and this pesky thing called a dissertation that requires one to gain specialized knowledge in an area of the field. I have many Eds and PhD level School psych friends and their training was limited in psychometrics, their exposure was to a narrower set of educational tests, and their understanding of the underlying neurophysiology non-existent (I know because I have tutored several of them). Are there EdS folks that are more familiar with tests than psychologists that don't practice in that area and have no interest in doing so (say a person specializing in mood disorders therapy)? Absolutely, but that is a bit a moot point as those folks are not the one you see to have your child evaluated. You see a pediatric neuropsychologist for that and that person has significantly more competence than an EdS in that area. The only area EdS may be more competent is in special education law and related issues.
As for the LPC running a inpatient rehab, they may have more experience than me running a pt through standard rehab practices. However, I would love to see one who could sit down and teach me a thing or two about being able to take, say a long term alcoholic trauma victim, and differentiate between his korsakoff's dementia, past trauma, and hx of stroke and heart problems and how all of these conditions come together to inform issues related to his ability to successfully complete substance abuse rehabilitation. That is where that useless broad based training comes in handy.}