- Joined
- Jan 12, 2007
- Messages
- 1,324
- Reaction score
- 7
Please discuss.
Yeah, but if you got hit by a car or found cancerous cells at your next pap, this would be a whole different story.All in all, me not having insurance has saved me $$$ so far, as I dont have to pay any premiums and only utilize a doctor when absolutely necessary.
cry.
Sadly... wait it off until it became urgent enough that an ER had to accept me. Not that I really see any other way.
Of course, I generally dislike the whole idea of ER being primary care when it's abused this way. Not really much else to be done until we "fix the system".
$100-150? A doctor once accidentally mailed me the bill instead of sending it to my insurance, and it was $500 - for a visit I paid because I had a really sore throat and the school's health services were not able to figure out what the deal was or how to fix it. The visit included 1 lab test, but that's it. That's more than I pay for Canadian healthcare for a YEAR in one 30-min visit!Or...I don't know...and maybe this is just crazy talk...you might consider paying for it yourself. A doctor's visit isn't that expensive. 100 bucks? 150?
What, are you folks old, multiply co-morbid people with sixteen medical conditions? Divert a little of your iPod or your bong money and pay for it yourself.
Jeez.
Or...I don't know...and maybe this is just crazy talk...you might consider paying for it yourself. A doctor's visit isn't that expensive. 100 bucks? 150?
What, are you folks old, multiply co-morbid people with sixteen medical conditions? Divert a little of your iPod or your bong money and pay for it yourself.
Jeez.
And this contributes to overcrowded ER's being used as primary care centers. We need universal coverage.
There's another side to that coin, however.
Part of the problem is that, ironically enough, ERs operate too efficiently relative to the rest of health care world. In other words, depending on the severity of your illness and your schedule, going to an ER at 2AM is probably a more efficient use of your time regardless of your insurance status. You get an X-Ray, scripts, etc. in a few hours, whereas if you try to make an appointment with your physician it could take a few days to a few weeks. Universal coverage would only amplify this problem.
Please discuss.
And then go to jail.Go to the ER and give them a fake name.
but I got a fake ID though...And then go to jail.
but I got a fake ID though...
I'd be broke if not for health insurence, a major surgery I had cost over 50000 for insurence company, it would cost more if I had to pay it myself.
Same at my school. And it wasn't that expensive, like $390 for the entire year...less than I pay here in Canada, although the coverage here is slightly better since there's no copay (even $20 can be hard to come up with at times when you're a college student).For those of you that are students, and don't have health insurance, how do you attend undergrad? My school is finally enforcing the mandated health coverage (either private or from the uni) and is putting registration holds on anyone that doesn't comply.
$100-150? A doctor once accidentally mailed me the bill instead of sending it to my insurance, and it was $500 - for a visit I paid because I had a really sore throat and the school's health services were not able to figure out what the deal was or how to fix it. The visit included 1 lab test, but that's it. That's more than I pay for Canadian healthcare for a YEAR in one 30-min visit!
And then go to jail.
panda, you keep it real.
panda, you keep it real.
Only in the United States would an uninsured citizen or legal immigrant have to declare bankrupcy over the cost of emergency surgery, while an uninsured illegal immigrant gets the government to pay.
I bet most people on SDN think nothing of dropping 50 bucks for a date or paying $300 for and iPOD. It's a question of priorties.
Please discuss.
Agree 100%. Everyday I walk past a city-based clinic (I believe its reduced cost, not 100% free) and its packed with people. I don't mind that. People need healthcare and some can't afford insurance. What does piss me off is when Man X or Woman Y comes out of the clinic, lights up, pulls out the $3-400 cell phone, and jumps in the cadillac or SUV. You mentioned messed up priorities. Perfect example. And its happens more than people think.Man. I'll tell you. There are a lot of people who are down on their luck and really need a helping hand. But there are many, many more who are just figgin' free-loaders.
I have a chronic condition that requires me to refill $750 in precriptions every month. Right now I'm covered under S-CHIP, but I don't know what's going to happen once I turn 21 and lose that coverage. There's no way I can afford private insurance, if I could even qualify for a policy given my "pre-existing condition." ?
There are lots of people with "pre-existing conditions" that get health insurance. The insurance company will either make you wait a while before they'll cover that condition, or they'll just require you to have had insurance up until the point that you switch over to their coverage. You're not SOL.if I could even qualify for a policy given my "pre-existing condition."
No he shoudn't get free care. The ciggarette companies that make billions off of people like him should pay for his care.And I'll extend this question for you all to "discuss:"
Should an asthmatic who smokes his way through $300 bucks worth of cigarettes a month get a free albuterol inhaler from the Emergency Department or any free treatment at all?
Oh, they will say things like, "Well, my sister gives me money for cigarettes," or, "I borrow money for weed" as an excuse for not being able to pay for thier meds.
Hey, mother****er, how about you get yer' stinkin' sister to lend you some money for your blood pressure pills.
I note with interest that nobody ever complains about the cost when I write them a prescription for Lortab or Vicodin. They'll pay for that. That gives 'em a rush. Toprol? It doesn't do a thing for them.
No he shoudn't get free care. The ciggarette companies that make billions off of people like him should pay for his care.
No he shoudn't get free care. The ciggarette companies that make billions off of people like him should pay for his care.
Contact sports weren't designed with people like you in mind.I'd be a goner. I've had three surgeries(torn meniscus, torn ACL, torn rotator cuff)
And most people in the developed world can't fathom a health-care system in which people that need care are denied it because they can't afford itHmm, so by that logic, you should hold columbian drug cartels accountable for every addiction rehab and treatment, or budweiser for every case of cirrhosis. I am personally in favor of free treatment, not because I disagree that the cigarette companies and smokers should share the responsibility, but because of the inevitable slippery slope that'll be created.
There is no way to conclusively prove that any disease is caused 100% by smoking, drinking, or eating badly- only that they increase the risk of some diseases. I can't fathom a health care system where one must take an insurance company to court to prove that a disease is less than 50% lifestyle related.
And most people in the developed world can't fathom a health-care system in which people that need care are denied it because they can't afford it
There's another side to that coin, however.
Part of the problem is that, ironically enough, ERs operate too efficiently relative to the rest of health care world. In other words, depending on the severity of your illness and your schedule, going to an ER at 2AM is probably a more efficient use of your time regardless of your insurance status. You get an X-Ray, scripts, etc. in a few hours, whereas if you try to make an appointment with your physician it could take a few days to a few weeks. Universal coverage would only amplify this problem.
Contact sports weren't designed with people like you in mind.
No he shoudn't get free care. The ciggarette companies that make billions off of people like him should pay for his care.
Well... you could stop treating non-emergent cases and referring people to clinics couldn't you? Countries with universal health care don't have this problem with ERs even though the wait time to appointments can be pretty long. I agree that people who have grown accustomed to getting care at the ER might be slow to change their behavior but after getting turned away a couple of times by EM docs maybe they would learn. Maybe I am being naive here and disregarding some complex policy issues, but why wouldn't this work?