I'm interested in the field and would love some answers. I've heard the starting salary is low but what does the average salary eventually look like?
This feels low fwiw. Yes it’s been 2 years but still. I’m an academic oncologist in NYC and of course we’re well known for having terribly low compensation for academics. I would say average nyc compensation is north of 250 maybe even 275. Nationwide I’d wager a guess it’s closer to 325 but I’m spitballingAAMC survey from 2022 has the average for all academic oncologists at 299k
Anecdotally, at my mid tier academic institution in a non desirable area, average is about 310. Kinda depressing given that the orthopods here make ~700This feels low fwiw. Yes it’s been 2 years but still. I’m an academic oncologist in NYC and of course we’re well known for having terribly low compensation for academics. I would say average nyc compensation is north of 250 maybe even 275. Nationwide I’d wager a guess it’s closer to 325 but I’m spitballing
Interesting maybe all we’ve seen is desirable areas catch up a bit. Starting salary at my institution is 250-275ish but we’re amongst the lowestAnecdotally, at my mid tier academic institution in a non desirable area, average is about 310. Kinda depressing given that the orthopods here make ~700
This feels low fwiw. Yes it’s been 2 years but still. I’m an academic oncologist in NYC and of course we’re well known for having terribly low compensation for academics. I would say average nyc compensation is north of 250 maybe even 275. Nationwide I’d wager a guess it’s closer to 325 but I’m spitballing
I think 300-ish (like my 2wRVU thing) is a reasonable baseline. Are people in academics making more or less? Of course.Anecdotally, at my mid tier academic institution in a non desirable area, average is about 310. Kinda depressing given that the orthopods here make ~700
This is obviously all very true. I feel a little seen with some of the text haha. In reality though it really is a spectrum but way less <250’s these days when that was the norm in 2020I think 300-ish (like my 2wRVU thing) is a reasonable baseline. Are people in academics making more or less? Of course.
The other thing to consider is how varied academic jobs can be compared to most community based jobs. Academic averages are going to include that basic research superstar with and R01 and a K coming out of fellowship who will see only metastatic triple negative breast patients half a day a week and work in her lab the rest of the week, and the "clinical assistant professors" who are out there grinding 3 1/2 clinic days a week plus 12 weeks of inpatient coverage a year. The first person's RVUs barely cover the salary of the MA that rooms their patients, the other one is keeping the department afloat and could pull in 7 figures doing the same work in a PP job.
In my experience, what people mean by hybrid practices are basically private practices that academia owns. The upsides include quicker referrals/access to specialists, ability to engage in tumor boards, and easier clinical trials enrollment; a few may have 1-2 half days at the "flagship" academic site. Pay is much better than academic physicians, comparable to true private practices, but with the loss of control that ownership provides. No one really does research in a rigorous way (and no one is expected to), while academic promotion is based on it.I've heard about hybrid academic community programmes as well
what is the a difference between an academic and hybrid practice in terms of involvement with research (type and time dedicated to it) and pay?
With all due respect, your status says you're a pre-med. If that's true, you've got at least 10 years ahead of you before this becomes an issue, and everything we say now has a chance of being completely wrong when it matters. Come back and ask then.I'm a little confused about how jobs at community centres operate so please help if you can!
What are community centres exactly? How are they different from private and academia?
Are owned by the hospital? Can they be non profit organizations? (Curious because i know you can only be allowed to work at non profit and academic organizations until you get a greencard which is gonna be a long journey for me as I'm Indian)
Does one need to have research and teaching responsibilities?
What is the payscale like? Is it more similar to academic or private or somewhere in between?
I would still really appreciate a response, or maybe you could let me know where to find those threads that discuss it. I'm having trouble finding them.With all due respect, your status says you're a pre-med. If that's true, you've got at least 10 years ahead of you before this becomes an issue, and everything we say now has a chance of being completely wrong when it matters. Come back and ask then.
If you're further along in the process, like a 2nd year fellow, then your timing is perfect. And there are lots of threads here that discuss it.
With all due respect, your status says you're a pre-med. If that's true, you've got at least 10 years ahead of you before this becomes an issue, and everything we say now has a chance of being completely wrong when it matters. Come back and ask then.
If you're further along in the process, like a 2nd year fellow, then your timing is perfect. And there are lots of threads here that discuss it.
I mean IM match*I would still really appreciate a response, or maybe you could let me know where to find those threads that discuss it. I'm having trouble finding them.
And I'm not sure what my status says but I'm applying for the match soon.
"hybrid" in community hematology oncology generally means - we won't pay you
"hybrid" in community hematology oncology generally means - we won't pay you.
Pretty much thisHybrid in my experience is a place that gives you a rank like "clinical assistant professor", have students/residents/fellows rotate with you in clinic for a few times a year. One grand rounds and a few Noon conference lectures are expected for the residents/fellows. Otherwise there isnt really any research expectation unless its needed for the next rank up. You still get paid on RVU model and end up doing 4-4.5 clinic days a week. So salary still in the range of a hospital employed doctor.
As with everything, it runs the gamut. In my old job, which was a "community-based academic" setting, there were opportunities galore for teaching, clinical research, lecturing, etc, as well as some compensation for it, typically in the form of annual bonuses. But there was no expectation, or requirement to do so. Roughly 20% of us did some of that stuff, everybody else didn't and just ground out the meat in clinic. Our pay was based on 25th %ile but once production bonuses kicked in, almost everyone was >50th %ile.
There are also academic positions where you just see patients and have student/residents/fellows in clinic or on the wards. Those pay a lot closer to true academic levels, but can pay better if there's a production component.
Finally, there are non-university hospital based and even private practice/MSG jobs out there with significant education and clinical research opportunities. They don't come with much in the way of titles, but they also pay on the higher end of the spectrum.
I can only tell you my experience as the clinical research director of an academ-ish clinical group. Although I was more than welcome to do LOIs and write IITs (both of which I did), it was on my own time and with minimal support (i.e., I was welcome to write a grant or just pay cash to cover the departmental statistician's time to help me).I'm curious to know what the set up of these jobs are like. I have seen job postings for "research directors" or "phase I research leadership" roles in these non-university or large PP groups. Do these roles have less clinical load compared to those without these research roles? What does the research component in these roles look like compared to say clinical investigators at university hospitals? Specifically, I wonder if they are actually writing LOI, opening their own IITs, collaborating with universities for the translational analyses, and presenting/publishing these data, or if they are mainly site directors for multi-center trials and enrolling patients. If it's the former, it sounds like a good compromise for clinical investigator type folks who want to run trials.