which way is better?

Started by sejin8642
This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

sejin8642

Full Member
10+ Year Member
5+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
If you have a conversation with interviewer, which way would you choose?

1.try to be agreeable
2.express honest opinion(which sounds like offending the interviewer)
3.just slip the conversation away cleverly

I am just curious 😉
 
If you have a conversation with interviewee, which way would you choose?

1.try to be agreeable
2.express honest opinion(which sounds like offending the interviewee)
3.just slip the conversation away cleverly

I am just curious 😉

Don't you mean convo with the interviewer?
 
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
Ooo, tough one. I'd probably say be agreeable. Anyone you talk to wants to feel like they're right even if they aren't, they're the authority and you need to impress them. Unless your integrity is on the line just be agreeable and don't cause any waves.
 
So what's the situation for the question you're asking? If your interview is going smoothly like a natural conversation, then I would try to remain agreeable. Don't rock the boat.

[EDIT]
lol Spice, I was making my post before you posted yours. What a coincidence . . .
 
This thread reminds me of your interview at Colorado, drawer. Atleast, you tried to be agreeable.
 
The question is:
During an interview is it best to be (1) completely agreeable with your interviewer even if you don't completely agree, (2) disagree with what they say and give your opinion if you don't completely agree, or (3) avoid a straight answer if you don't agree?
 
I have been to 6 interviews I think and was never faced with anything controversial. Besides AZ, that was just odd, but still it wouldn't help you to offend anyone. Be agreeable, kiss ace hard, sell it man!

Have you been to an interview?
 
just be yourself. everyone does it differently...theres no right answer.