Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
What's the difference between a 0-6 and 2+4?
One difference is that people in 0-6 programs think they actually are PharmD students in years 1-2 when they are just doing what would be considered the usual pre-pharmacy curriculum anywhere else. Everything is considered part of the PharmD program. For 2+4, the "2" (could be 3, or could even be 4) is explicitly considered pre-pharmacy in general and the "4" (could be 3) is the professional curriculum.
A possibly real difference is that for "2+4" programs admission into the PharmD program generally is not guaranteed even if minimum standards are met, whereas for 0-6 programs if you clear the minimum bar, you can move on. However, the 2+4 types of programs may give admissions preference to students from the same institution who did their pre-pharmacy program (like University at Buffalo's "Early Assurance" which requires fairly high GPA cutoffs and a supplemental application or Pitt's "conditional admission" which still requires the PCAT, PharmCAS and supplemental application anyway).
I don't know what UoP does because there doesn't seem to be that much information about their 2+3, 3+3, and 4+3 programs as far as what students should expect. I tried to Google it up and it seems they are pretty lax... provided you can actually meet the GPA requirements. I couldn't find squat on any supplemental application required for pre-pharmacy students at UoP.
Someone correct me if I'm off. I could care less in that I care only to inform myself to the point of possibly telling acquaintances in the future not to let their kids consider 0-6 programs in general.
Last edited:




