Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
-
CycleTrack and SDN are teaming up to make medical school admissions more transparent and accessible! Read the announcement to learn how we’re supporting the future of CycleTrack’s free application-tracking tools .
Will Trump win again???
Started by Planktonmd
Get help with your application
Use all the free resources available to you from SDN: articles, guides, expert advising, forums discussions, and school research.
- Status
The fact remains that there was zero collusion with Russia.
Watch Mueller's testimony for the context of why they wrote "did not exonerate".
Hey Mikkel, deep down in your endocardium, you know that if not for Russian Twitter accounts, you would have voted for HRC.
Admit it!!!
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
I went to a NYC women's rally because a Russian ad on Facebook told me to, I'm ashamed to admit. The Russians really hacked my subconscious.
Is there an unbiased mouthpiece???
I try to hear both and assume it is somewhere in the middle. Or find an argument that is ironclad before I repeat it. But even then, you usually find out something is skewed or omitted.
Regarding this "trial", I find it funny that Ambassador Sondland has all the headlines with this overwhelming evidence proving Trump wrong..... but, the left is protesting his businesses because they don't like what he said. Something don't add up. Likely just headlines that are bogus.
Of course it’s bogus headlines. The day that Sondland testified that he had zero proof of a quid pro quo and only a presumption about aid being withheld, all you saw were headlines like “Bombshell witness destroys Trump!” Etc etc.
It’s all a game.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Headlines are effective in brainwashing "highly educated" liberals who just read headlines to validate their pre conceived ideas.
It’s all about priming the public to shape opinion. Just like they are starting to call Trump supporters part of a cult. Half the country ya know, but a cult nonetheless. Goes back to the same thing leftist here do. Attack the person, attack the group, slurs and ad hominem attacks. Over and over and over. Ignore the message, attach the messenger.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Haha.
Coming from the architects/dupes of the Russia hoax, the Covington hoax, the Kavanaugh hoax, the markets-will-be-devastated-by-Trump's-election hoax, the Trump-will-create-nuclear-war-with-NK hoax... this is rich.
Maybe the "cult" line of attack will make it into a Tucker Carlson report on a new talking point making its rounds through the media.
All the media talking heads speaking in unison:
"Bombshell", "Cult", "Problematic", "Troubling", "Bribery"
Remember when all the Trump sycophants on the intelligence committee clutched their pearls, turned into Foghorn Leghorn, and shouted "I do declare, how dare you madam!?" as Hill told them that some members of their party are falling prey to a Russian intelligence operation designed to make gullible MAGA *****s in the US think Ukraine and not Russia hacked 2016?
------------
During an interview on Fox News Sunday, Wallace asked Kennedy, “Who do you believe was responsible for hacking the DNC and Clinton campaign computers, their emails? Was it Russia or Ukraine?”
Kennedy said that he didn’t know who was responsible for the hacks and claimed that no one else knows either, saying, “I don’t know, nor do you, nor do any of us.”
Wallace cut Kennedy off before he could continue, telling the senator, “Let me just interrupt to say the entire intelligence community says it was Russia.”
------------
------------
During an interview on Fox News Sunday, Wallace asked Kennedy, “Who do you believe was responsible for hacking the DNC and Clinton campaign computers, their emails? Was it Russia or Ukraine?”
Kennedy said that he didn’t know who was responsible for the hacks and claimed that no one else knows either, saying, “I don’t know, nor do you, nor do any of us.”
Wallace cut Kennedy off before he could continue, telling the senator, “Let me just interrupt to say the entire intelligence community says it was Russia.”
------------
The whole business is reminiscent of a matador waving a red rag first here and then there, each time successfully getting the enraged bull to stamp its feet, flare its nostrils, and charge at the latest bait.
After Covington, Kavanaugh, the Russia hoax, Pissgate, and stock market fear-mongering, I'd sooner trust a convicted thief than I would the media.
Olé!
D
deleted171991
This is what happens in a cult:
www.collaborativefund.com
No More Gurus
Avianca flight 052, from Medellin to New York, was circling JFK for landing in bad weather.
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
Things are getting a bit clearer to me regarding Bloomberg entering the race. I personally don't see him as a strong candidate. His negatives are: no personality, he's an "evil" billionaire, his Stop and Frisk was seen as racist, outside of NY/east I don't think he has name recognition, and I'm not sure what political accomplishments he can tout. His positives would be that he is a successful businessman and he was a decent NYC mayor, especially when compared to DeBlasio. But, this weekend there was a news story that lit the light bulb...
Bloomberg News will stick with it's policy of not doing any investigative (critical) pieces on its owner, MB. Because this could be seen as an advantage, they will also not do these types of articles/stories on the other Dem candidates. BUT they WILL do critical pieces on...wait for it...Trump! And this is their idea of fairness. So, by MB entering the race, they can ramp up the media propaganda even more. The other Dems are publicly pushing back, but privately I'm sure they are quite pleased.
Also, because of campaign finance laws, it is necessary for MB to be a registered candidate in order to spend the estimated $100 Million dollars on anti-Trump ads that he plans to run. Even if MB is last in the Dem. polls, all Dems will benefit from his ads. I think he's being instructed to enter the race for these 2 reasons. These motivating factors make sense to me, much more than his actual chance of spending all of his time and money and going on to win the Dec. primaries.
Bloomberg News will stick with it's policy of not doing any investigative (critical) pieces on its owner, MB. Because this could be seen as an advantage, they will also not do these types of articles/stories on the other Dem candidates. BUT they WILL do critical pieces on...wait for it...Trump! And this is their idea of fairness. So, by MB entering the race, they can ramp up the media propaganda even more. The other Dems are publicly pushing back, but privately I'm sure they are quite pleased.
Also, because of campaign finance laws, it is necessary for MB to be a registered candidate in order to spend the estimated $100 Million dollars on anti-Trump ads that he plans to run. Even if MB is last in the Dem. polls, all Dems will benefit from his ads. I think he's being instructed to enter the race for these 2 reasons. These motivating factors make sense to me, much more than his actual chance of spending all of his time and money and going on to win the Dec. primaries.
Last edited:
This is what happens in a cult:
No More Gurus
Avianca flight 052, from Medellin to New York, was circling JFK for landing in bad weather.
You know what comes to mind when I think of a cult? The Nxivm Sex Slave Cult headquartered outside of Albany, NY. The one where women were branded with the initials of Keith Raniere, the leader. KR went to RPI in Troy, NY, a very renown engineering college. Hmph. Just goes to show you that highly intelligent, educated people can be sociopaths and psychopaths. Nxivm's a cult where woman were enslaved and sexually abused, children were being experimented on, and much more. It's also kind of interesting, to me anyway, that Kirsten Gillibrand, (HRC's NY Senate replacement, and failed presidential candidate), her father was involved with that cult. Kind of funny, huh, that a NY Senator would have this right under her nose, yet..nope, nothing done. And with it being a stone's throw away from Gov. Cuomo in Albany, I find it odd that it went unnoticed by him, too. Well, maybe I just have high expectations for my elected officials. Oh, yeah, and those Mormon sect women and children who were gunned down in Juarez, Mexico? Yeah, them. Well, there may have been a Nxivm connection with them, too. Seems they were trafficking women from Mexico to US, you know, because Juarez is a stone's throw from El Paso. Man, I hope that pesky border wall doesn't slow down the drugs and sex slave trade. Anyway, yeah, real cults do exist. So if "cult member" is the new "deplorable" slur, just be prepared for the massive blowback. Because if you keep kicking a sleeping dog, regardless of how docile he seems, he is eventually going to bite your @ss.
Last edited:
D
deleted171991
I just wanted to show what happens when people are afraid to speak truth to power. I think that's pretty much what's been happening in the White House.
One doesn't tell an "emperor" that he doesn't have clothes (like one would tell a competent president). The main reason our plane hasn't crashed yet is probably the "deep state".
Last edited by a moderator:
D
deleted171991
Some more along the same lines:
Some people would call Richard Spencer deep state. I call him... patriot.
'Rule of law is what sets us apart': Richard Spencer's scathing final letter as Navy secretary
In the letter he submitted on his way out the door, Richard Spencer did not say that he resigned but rather stated, "I hereby acknowledge my termination."
www.usatoday.com
Some people would call Richard Spencer deep state. I call him... patriot.
D
deleted171991
More about the Bloomberg conspiracy:
Bloomberg campaign chief: Trump is winning 2020 election right now
Democratic presidential candidate Mike Bloomberg’s 2020 campaign chief Kevin Sheekey defended the former New York City mayor’s decision to skip early nominating states after his late entry into the…
thehill.com
I thought you were talking about the neo nazi guy for a secondSome more along the same lines:
'Rule of law is what sets us apart': Richard Spencer's scathing final letter as Navy secretary
In the letter he submitted on his way out the door, Richard Spencer did not say that he resigned but rather stated, "I hereby acknowledge my termination."www.usatoday.com
Some people would call Richard Spencer deep state. I call him... patriot.
So, climate change is fake, a product of MSM and faulty science? Hmmn, why does every fortune 100 company have a portion of their risk management that solely focuses on climate change and have attendant insurance instruments to protect its attendant affects....
markets.businessinsider.com
Goldman Sachs released a 34-page analysis of the effects of climate change. And the results are terrifying.
So, climate change is fake, a product of MSM and faulty science? Hmmn, why does every fortune 100 company have a portion of their risk management that solely focuses on climate change and have attendant insurance instruments to protect its attendant affects....
Goldman Sachs released a 34-page analysis of the effects of climate change. And the results are terrifying.
THAT is proof of climate change?????
Ok.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The proof for me, in large part, is that our largest and most influential corporate entities have placed sizable research, resources and mitigating actions in place.
But, hey you are the oracle Matty who knows better, and somehow, knows better than CEOS, doctors and for that matter lawyers, despite no formal education in such matters...
fortune.com
But, hey you are the oracle Matty who knows better, and somehow, knows better than CEOS, doctors and for that matter lawyers, despite no formal education in such matters...
U.S. Companies Are Setting Climate Change Policies Despite Trump | Fortune
U.S.-based firms made up a fifth of those in a 2017 "A list."
The proof for me, in large part, is that our largest and most influential corporate entities have placed sizable research, resources and mitigating actions in place.
But, hey you are the oracle Matty who knows better, and somehow, knows better than CEOS, doctors and for that matter lawyers, despite no formal education in such matters...
U.S. Companies Are Setting Climate Change Policies Despite Trump | Fortune
U.S.-based firms made up a fifth of those in a 2017 "A list."
Did you even watch the clip I posted? No.
I’m no genius, but Freeman Dyson is, and so is his colleague that developed the first climate model. Watch it if you care to learn something. It’s not that long. But suit yourself.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Here I’ll leave
Here you go, but knowing you, you know better than a collective group of MIT PhDs. Which begs the question: what is your educational background and why should anyone be deferential to you?
Here you go, but knowing you, you know better than a collective group of MIT PhDs. Which begs the question: what is your educational background and why should anyone be deferential to you?
Dyson is a brilliant physicist, at least when it comes to quantum electrodynamics. What he's not is a published climate scientist
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
Boola Boola....https://e360.yale.edu/features/freeman_dyson_takes_on_the_climate_establishment
And he has been thoroughly been debunked by folks that actually work in the field.
My apologies:
MIT podcast breaks down the facts on climate change
The MIT TILClimate (Today I Learned Climate) podcast demystifies the science, technology, and policy surrounding climate change in 10-minute bites.
No, he’s been bashed by opposing climate scientists and his views are backed by many climate scientists too. There is no “98% consensus.” Do some research yourself if you care to learn more. If you wanna post articles bashing “climate deniers” you can do that all day. Obviously that’s the main stream view and people defend CC like they’re defending a religion, so there’s articles galore.
But if you want to learn something, research Anthony watts, Roy Spencer, Willie Soon and many others who can educate you on the truth about climate data collection, NASAs data adjustments, etc etc.
It’s up to you. I’m not gonna try and give you a lecture on climate. Do some research yourself or just keep posting articles. Your choice.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
More about the Bloomberg conspiracy:
Bloomberg campaign chief: Trump is winning 2020 election right now
Democratic presidential candidate Mike Bloomberg’s 2020 campaign chief Kevin Sheekey defended the former New York City mayor’s decision to skip early nominating states after his late entry into the…
What I got out of this article is: 1)Trump is wiping the floor with all of the current Dem. candidates, and 2) MB has a horrible campaign strategy.
Skipping the early states is not going to get him in the spotlight. That's when all the hoopla happens. Super Tuesday is only about 4 months away. Why is he throwing away opportunities to gain traction? If MB thinks Trump is "an existential threat," then why is he being lazy? He should be working his butt off to win. There's a saying: All politics is local. A candidate needs to go out and meet the locals and see what matters to them. Different populations have different concerns. To me, this comes off as arrogant. It is reminiscent of HRC's lackadaisical campaign approach. I don't think it's a winning strategy. It seems almost as if he's just in the race to throw his money around, buy ads, and manipulate the press coverage. Because this will suppress bad press on the Dems, but they'll be free to trash talk Trump. Using some bogus anonymous sources, they can create a bad story on Trump. Next thing you know other media outlets are using Bloomberg News as their source for a big story. It just smells rotten to me.
My environmentalism makes me inclined to err on the side of caution regarding global warming. That and my dislike of oppressively hot weather.
This being said, the hypocrisy of Gore, celebrities, etc. in simultaneously shrieking about climate change and flying in private jets is obnoxious.
This being said, the hypocrisy of Gore, celebrities, etc. in simultaneously shrieking about climate change and flying in private jets is obnoxious.
Dr. Spencer is on the board of directors of the George C. Marshall Institute, a right-wing conservative think tank on scientific issues and public policy. He listed as an expert for the Heartland Institute, a libertarian American public policy think tank. Dr. Spencer is also listed as an expert by the International Climate and Environmental Change Assessment Project (ICECAP), a global warming "skeptic" organization.
Watts is a partisan hack and blogger that doesn’t even have a college degree...you really got to be kidding on this one, seriously?
Soon, is also widely rejected and is also a paid hack for the energy industry.
You could have easily saved time and basically got the three stooges....
Color me shocked. You bashed the people I told you to look into instead of countering anything they have said.
Yawn.
Wait, so should I have only told you to look into the opinion of climate alarmist scientists? The problem is that you say so and so is a climate skeptic as if it means something negative about their background, work in the field, or their expertise. You have a predetermined opinion and have no desire to look into it further. And if your rebuttal to every point raised or person to look into is “that person has been rejected by climate scientists” you’re just wasting your time. I’m not gonna say it again, if you want to actually research the topic, good. If you want to bash anyone who isn’t a climate alarmist without actually looking into their work, well, that just kinda makes you a schmuck.
Also...
“Roy Warren Spencer (born December 20, 1955)[1] is a meteorologist,[2] a principal research scientist at the University of Alabama in Huntsville, and the U.S. Science Team leader for the Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer (AMSR-E) on NASA's Aqua satellite.[3][4] He has served as senior scientist for climate studies at NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center.[3][4]
He is known for his satellite-based temperature monitoring work, for which he was awarded the American Meteorological Society's Special Award”
Total climate denying kook.....
[emoji849]
And FYI, watts may not be a PhD, but you should look into his work on the temperature data gathering stations before you bash him. Considering it’s the basis for all the surface temperature record, it’s very important and it’s very interesting how corrupted a bunch of the data is. Again, if you actually care, look into it. If not, keep yapping about climate deniers.
Finally, most of the climate scientists that are climate alarmists could be considered paid hacks. Where do you think they get their funding? Do you think so-called climate denying research gets funded? Think about that for a moment....
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Last edited:
I don't think using children as pawns is an admirable or acceptable strategy for the climate alarmists. Greta Thunberg's speech at the UN was one of the most bizarre things I've seen in recent history. Just watch and listen to 1) the real emotional distress that she appears to be in and 2) the place she has been given as expert in the field of climatology. I'm sorry, but she's a 17 year old girl (whose parents should probably be charged with mental abuse of a child). She is no expert. Yet, here she is center stage in front of the entire world. Then on to all the talk shows. She obviously gains the attention of other children, and then they react by becoming fearful, too. Yes, educate children to be good stewards of a cleaner earth, conserve, reduce waste, recycle, don't litter, plant trees, etc. Don't create Eco-anxiety-riddled children.
Psychologists said "terrifying" climate change discussions about mankind's doom have increased children seeking medication for "eco-anxiety"
Psychologists said "terrifying" climate change discussions about mankind's doom have increased children seeking medication for "eco-anxiety"
Dyson‘s own quote:
I would much rather the job would be done by somebody who is young and an actual real expert....
All I need to know....
The closest I can think of is BBC America.
Do some research boo. Also don’t be so blatantly hyperbolic, it’s not a good look.
Ask yourself? Why would a lead scientist at NASA like Roy Spencer go against the climate alarmists? He knows he’s gonna be mocked, knows he’s not gonna get any govt funding, he knows he’s up against the “consensus” so why do it?
Only one reason.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Last edited:
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
Even if that is correct, that does not mean he is correct or the absolute source of the answer....major difference. Being earnest is not a substitute for veracity.
Well when you dismiss him out of pocket because he works for an evil ‘skeptical’ institution, it becomes worthwhile to talk about his motives and integrity. I’m much more likely to dismiss someone who produces research that keeps the money rolling in and much more likely to say hmmm, this guy may have a point when he’s coming out with scientific opinions that he knows do nothing to benefit him personally or professionally.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Dude, really?The climate "community" tends to not see the forest through the trees.
What is wrong with you?
You show a timeline of 5.5 million years displaying about 6 degrees of temperature variation in 41,000 to 100,000 year cycles, and because of this you somehow draw the conclusion that 1-2 degrees on a 200 time year scale is ... what, exactly?
Expected?
Part of a natural cycle measured in tens of thousands of years?
Unimportant?
Between about 20,0000-100,000 years ago, glaciers covering all of Canada and the northern USA to a depth measured in kilometers.
For reference on the idiotic time scale you posted, that's here:
To be clear - and it's ridiculous that I even have to clarify this for your - I'm not suggesting that glaciers are going to cover North America soon.
I'm only suggesting that throwing out a 5.5M year temperature record (produced by the very same climate scientists you are ignoring now) as some kind of argument that explains and allows you to dismiss short term temperature changes that coincide with industrial human society is about the dumbest thing you've ever posted here.
"No foie gras for you!"---Bill de Blasio (aka Warren Wilhelm Jr) bans sale of foie gras in NYC, siting animal cruelty as reason. This article says it quite aptly and fairly. If there is an animal cruelty issue, then regulate the farmers. Don't penalize the restaurants. The progressive methods just don't make logical sense.
Having solved all other problems, NYC bans foie gras
And speaking of animal cruelty...remember this de Blasio gem? R.I.P. Staten Island Chuck.
Having solved all other problems, NYC bans foie gras
And speaking of animal cruelty...remember this de Blasio gem? R.I.P. Staten Island Chuck.
- Status
