WSJ: Yale Medical School Discrimination Case

Started by drusso
This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
Get help with your application

Use all the free resources available to you from SDN: articles, guides, expert advising, forums discussions, and school research.

Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
Just keep it fun! I'm an avid tennis player and have tried lessons with my 3 daughters with limited success despite my best efforts. They'll play tennis with me for fun but refuse lessons. They're all into soccer now (wife's sport damn it).

Oldest is 10 so there's still time...
regardless of what you offer them, they will decide what to do when they become a teenagers. you might get lucky and one of them gets the bug...

my wife and i have done:
skating lessons
skiing lessons
softball lessons
volleyball lessons
piano lessons
harp lessons
violin lessons
tennis lessons

teams included:
softball
volleyball
soccer
lacrosse
tennis
robotics


2 teenagers and 1 adult - and they now do none of these activities.
 
merit alone unfortunately is used as a proxy towards whites and inadvertently asians.

if it were all about merit, then why restrict asians?


i suspect we are at the start of restriction of asian enrollment at elite universities. start with immigrants, then move on Wasians.
That’s the point of the study, it wasn’t about merit, it was about skin color which resulted in discrimination against Asians. Surely you would be against this. You need to read Suicidal empathy. You’d relate
 
regardless of what you offer them, they will decide what to do when they become a teenagers. you might get lucky and one of them gets the bug...

my wife and i have done:
skating lessons
skiing lessons
softball lessons
volleyball lessons
piano lessons
harp lessons
violin lessons
tennis lessons

teams included:
softball
volleyball
soccer
lacrosse
tennis
robotics


2 teenagers and 1 adult - and they now do none of these activities.
Activities are great..someone else can do the parenting for 30 minutes while they are there. I’m pretty sure that’s why my friends have their kids in multiple activities occupying large portions of weekends. I don’t think any of them believe that a star soccer/dance/basketball/hockey player was born….
 
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
That’s the point of the study, it wasn’t about merit, it was about skin color which resulted in discrimination against Asians. Surely you would be against this. You need to read Suicidal empathy. You’d relate
was listening to the Mo News Podcast this morning which was an interview with the author of Suicidal Empathy.
 
Activities are great..someone else can do the parenting for 30 minutes while they are there. I’m pretty sure that’s why my friends have their kids in multiple activities occupying large portions of weekends. I don’t think any of them believe that a star soccer/dance/basketball/hockey player was born….
Parenting is exhausting but rewarding at the same time. There are days when I wanted to just give up and leave them to their own devices. But that does not make the men and women that you want them to be.
 
I was too!
I haven't read the book but looked at the excerpt. I may read it.

My question would be, "Is the discussion that we are having an example of suicidal empathy or reasoned compassion"

I would say the latter making discussion of this book in this context moot.
 
the problem remains that merit as determined in our society are through tests and exams that have underlying discriminatory bias on top of minority groups having poorer access to high merit education and activities.

one cannot get ahead if they start behind and are purposefully kept behind.


its like a 100-yard dash. normally, fastest wins in a merit based race.


lane 6 is 10 yards shorter. lane 7 is 10 yards longer. lane 8 is water laden. lane 9 is gravel for half of its distance and shrewn broken bottles the last half. lane 10 ends 25 yards from the finish.

white individuals get lanes 1-5. minorities get the other lanes.


DEI and affirmative action are meant to equalize. shorten lane 7. squeegee lane 8. pave lane 9, brush off glass. finish lane 10.

then, everyone gets the same opportunity to finish. but those are illegal now.
 
the problem remains that merit as determined in our society are through tests and exams that have underlying discriminatory bias on top of minority groups having poorer access to high merit education and activities.

one cannot get ahead if they start behind and are purposefully kept behind.


its like a 100-yard dash. normally, fastest wins in a merit based race.


lane 6 is 10 yards shorter. lane 7 is 10 yards longer. lane 8 is water laden. lane 9 is gravel for half of its distance and shrewn broken bottles the last half. lane 10 ends 25 yards from the finish.

white individuals get lanes 1-5. minorities get the other lanes.


DEI and affirmative action are meant to equalize. shorten lane 7. squeegee lane 8. pave lane 9, brush off glass. finish lane 10.

then, everyone gets the same opportunity to finish. but those are illegal now.
Nope you’re completely wrong. What about all the poor uneducated whites in Appalachia. Your skin color metric completely misses them
 
Is there a study about how different races perform once they are in these elite universities?
This may help answer your question

DEI initiatives have dumbed down the academic pool

OPINION: A whopping 720 named signatories, mostly from UC Berkeley, but also San Diego, UCLA, Irvine, Davis and Santa Barbara, have published a document demanding a return to test taking. Their disciplines range from math to physics to computer science to engineering.

According to the letter, so many students entering STEM schools aren’t even literate in middle school math.

Yes, you read that correctly. Students entering California’s premiere higher learning school system for science and technology are not doing math adequately enough to pass eighth grade.

“We now observe preparation gaps so severe that instructors must reteach middle-school mathematics while simultaneously teaching the material students need for sciences, engineering, economics, and other quantitatively demanding fields,” the letter states

We predicted this

“This outcome was explicitly predicted by the Academic Senate’s 2020 Standardized Testing Task Force (STTF) report, which warned that removing these tests would eliminate a vital predictor of college success and obscure the impact of severe high-school grade inflation.”
Your crusade for equity has trapped unprepared students

The SAT/ACT mathematics requirement is not an obstacle to equity; rather, it is a prerequisite for it. Failing to measure preparation gaps does not remove barriers; it moves them into the classroom, where they become harder to overcome. An admissions process that ignores foundational readiness does a disservice to the most vulnerable students.
 
This may help answer your question

DEI initiatives have dumbed down the academic pool

OPINION: A whopping 720 named signatories, mostly from UC Berkeley, but also San Diego, UCLA, Irvine, Davis and Santa Barbara, have published a document demanding a return to test taking. Their disciplines range from math to physics to computer science to engineering.

According to the letter, so many students entering STEM schools aren’t even literate in middle school math.

Yes, you read that correctly. Students entering California’s premiere higher learning school system for science and technology are not doing math adequately enough to pass eighth grade.

“We now observe preparation gaps so severe that instructors must reteach middle-school mathematics while simultaneously teaching the material students need for sciences, engineering, economics, and other quantitatively demanding fields,” the letter states

We predicted this


Your crusade for equity has trapped unprepared students



talk about dumb and dumber. that article was not about DEI. that article by a biased conservative site was about test taking and how students entering were not as prepared - as a whole, not blacks only.

the authors argued that the lack of test taking was causing unprepared students to be accepted. they made no comment that DEI was making students unprepared.

correlation, not causation between test scores and preparation for college and no relationship of DEI to preparedness.


what happened was covid and its effects on high school education.


===

fix the underlying racism in our current system.

then the merit system works.

the underlying system also adversely affects poor people while benefitting rich billionaires. you guys are arguing about the "evils" of SNAP while billionaires live off of potential gains while accumulating so much wealth that their generations of offspring could never spend it. or tariffs - the tariffs last 6 months would have fully funded SNAP

if one thinks that fixing underlying systemic racism is impossible, then the next logical step is to provide those who have been under such suppression to get extra education, training, assistance so that they too can reach the pinnacle of their individual abilities.

thats DEI.


or deny that it is an issue and keep suppressing minorities and wonder why certain groups never get the american dream.
 
merit alone unfortunately is used as a proxy towards whites and inadvertently asians.

if it were all about merit, then why restrict asians?


i suspect we are at the start of restriction of asian enrollment at elite universities. start with immigrants, then move on Wasians.
Please tell me we can work within the nuanced framework that our policies may limit student visas to our greatest geopolitical foe that has operatives acting against US interests while not being “racist” and causing all kids with a tan to be fearful of removal from societal opportunities.
 
This may help answer your question

DEI initiatives have dumbed down the academic pool

OPINION: A whopping 720 named signatories, mostly from UC Berkeley, but also San Diego, UCLA, Irvine, Davis and Santa Barbara, have published a document demanding a return to test taking. Their disciplines range from math to physics to computer science to engineering.

According to the letter, so many students entering STEM schools aren’t even literate in middle school math.

Yes, you read that correctly. Students entering California’s premiere higher learning school system for science and technology are not doing math adequately enough to pass eighth grade.

“We now observe preparation gaps so severe that instructors must reteach middle-school mathematics while simultaneously teaching the material students need for sciences, engineering, economics, and other quantitatively demanding fields,” the letter states

We predicted this


Your crusade for equity has trapped unprepared students



Can you ever quote anything that is not absolutely 100% partisan?

California is not test optional. They are test blind by choice. The have also banned race based admission for several decades.

So if California hasnt accepted race based admissions for decades and they have decided on their own for test blind policies, how can you sit there and say that lack of mathemathics skill in a bunch of UC public schools is somehow related to what you are calling DEI. It doesn't make any sense and you should be ashamed for making such a faulty inference.
 
Please tell me we can work within the nuanced framework that our policies may limit student visas to our greatest geopolitical foe that has operatives acting against US interests while not being “racist” and causing all kids with a tan to be fearful of removal from societal opportunities.
That is a very difficult question. It is clear that the vast majority of Chinese students are not involved in this but it is equally clear that a minority are spies. China has a worldwide surveillance system and threatens their families at home.

I dont support a comprehensive ban of all Chinese students but I must admit that I dont have a solution here.
 
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
That is a very difficult question. It is clear that the vast majority of Chinese students are not involved in this but it is equally clear that a minority are spies. China has a worldwide surveillance system and threatens their families at home.

I dont support a comprehensive ban of all Chinese students but I must admit that I dont have a solution here.
YOU need to read Suicidal Empathy too. Let's start a book club. I know @Pain Applicant1 will read it!
 
I will look at it but the excerpt suggests that it is not applicable to our discussions.
 
Last edited:
regardless of what you offer them, they will decide what to do when they become a teenagers. you might get lucky and one of them gets the bug...

my wife and i have done:
skating lessons
skiing lessons
softball lessons
volleyball lessons
piano lessons
harp lessons
violin lessons
tennis lessons

teams included:
softball
volleyball
soccer
lacrosse
tennis
robotics


2 teenagers and 1 adult - and they now do none of these activities.
These sound like the most boring activities for a kid. How about go karting?
 
talk about dumb and dumber. that article was not about DEI. that article by a biased conservative site was about test taking and how students entering were not as prepared - as a whole, not blacks only.

the authors argued that the lack of test taking was causing unprepared students to be accepted. they made no comment that DEI was making students unprepared.

correlation, not causation between test scores and preparation for college and no relationship of DEI to preparedness.


what happened was covid and its effects on high school education.


===

fix the underlying racism in our current system.

then the merit system works.

the underlying system also adversely affects poor people while benefitting rich billionaires. you guys are arguing about the "evils" of SNAP while billionaires live off of potential gains while accumulating so much wealth that their generations of offspring could never spend it. or tariffs - the tariffs last 6 months would have fully funded SNAP

if one thinks that fixing underlying systemic racism is impossible, then the next logical step is to provide those who have been under such suppression to get extra education, training, assistance so that they too can reach the pinnacle of their individual abilities.

thats DEI.


or deny that it is an issue and keep suppressing minorities and wonder why certain groups never get the american dream.
Your entire assertion and post is personal biased gibberish attacking the site. Here’s the actual letter. It references “under-resourced” students which is another term for minority and explicitly counters that the ACT/SAT is not an obstacle to equity leading one to assume this is why it was removed in the first place. Your incessant excuses are entertaining

1780269403328.png
 
Last edited:
"covid for equity" is a lie.

covid was an equal opportunity virus.

i am not an opponent of standardized testing, but the testing has to be race neutral. in the past, this was a primary concern.


another problem with standardized testing is that those in lower SES have reduced access to test prep.

third, you are making a critical assumption that "under-resourced" equals minority. someone who is under resourced doesnt have the resources - such as students who had to take online courses. note that the entire article never mentions any minority being affected - it disusses ALL students. whites included.


finally, the test will not correct the problems with education that occurred during covid pandemic.


taking the ACT/SAT test wont fix the fact that kids were not given adequate education during those years.
 
This is what happens when society is left to its own decisions on who has "merit"

Merit is only seen as those who look like the selectors. Things like White Africaners get immigration priority over all others because they "deserve" it
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20260602-074340_Samsung Browser.jpg
    Screenshot_20260602-074340_Samsung Browser.jpg
    66.9 KB · Views: 71
California has been race blind since 1995 and test blind since COVID.

They found what a lot of us know. The tests are flawed
 
YOU need to read Suicidal Empathy too. Let's start a book club. I know @Pain Applicant1 will read it!
My apps don't have it yet but if you're serious I'll pay to take it out.

They do have his other books parasitic mind and truth about happiness so I can read those with you if you want
 
I'm finishing up The Sea Wolves which is a history of the vikings.. Despite how glorified and cool vikings may sound they're not nearly as exiciting as the mongols. Maybe the book just isn't that great.
 
This is what happens when society is left to its own decisions on who has "merit"

Merit is only seen as those who look like the selectors. Things like White Africaners get immigration priority over all others because they "deserve" it

Chief Pentagon spokesperson Sean Parnell said in response: "This story, like many others at the failing New York Times is full of fake news from anonymous sources who have no idea what they’re talking about and are far removed from actual decision-makers within the Pentagon."

"Under Secretary Hegseth, military promotions are given to those who have earned them," he went on. "Meritocracy, which reigns in this department, is apolitical and unbiased."

Pentagon chief of staff Ricky Buria added: "This is completely false. Whoever placed this made up story is clearly trying to sow division among our ranks and within the department and the administration. It's not going to work, and it never will work when this department is led by clear-eyed, mission driven leaders unfazed by Washington gossip."
 
Chief Pentagon spokesperson Sean Parnell said in response: "This story, like many others at the failing New York Times is full of fake news from anonymous sources who have no idea what they’re talking about and are far removed from actual decision-makers within the Pentagon."

"Under Secretary Hegseth, military promotions are given to those who have earned them," he went on. "Meritocracy, which reigns in this department, is apolitical and unbiased."

Pentagon chief of staff Ricky Buria added: "This is completely false. Whoever placed this made up story is clearly trying to sow division among our ranks and within the department and the administration. It's not going to work, and it never will work when this department is led by clear-eyed, mission driven leaders unfazed by Washington gossip."
i trust the NYT more than I trust trump's pentagon spokesman...... and i dont trust the NYT
 
Chief Pentagon spokesperson Sean Parnell said in response: "This story, like many others at the failing New York Times is full of fake news from anonymous sources who have no idea what they’re talking about and are far removed from actual decision-makers within the Pentagon."

"Under Secretary Hegseth, military promotions are given to those who have earned them," he went on. "Meritocracy, which reigns in this department, is apolitical and unbiased."

Pentagon chief of staff Ricky Buria added: "This is completely false. Whoever placed this made up story is clearly trying to sow division among our ranks and within the department and the administration. It's not going to work, and it never will work when this department is led by clear-eyed, mission driven leaders unfazed by Washington gossip."
Of course that is what he says. If you look at actions instead of words, it is easy to see that a large number of blacks and women were fired only because they were black and women. Ditto to LGBTQ. There was no review of any kind of any of their records. They didn't really try to hide it. If you really are interested, it is easy to find.
 
here is the official promotion list.


at the very least it can be stated that there are no women out of 22 individuals on the list.

statistically speaking, there should be 3 women that were promoted.
DEI is over bro. You get promoted if the boss thinks you're the best person for the job.

We're not reserving 3 spots for women and 2 spots for blacks and 1.5 spots for trans biracial meta humans.

No more DEI.
 
Last edited:
Of course that is what he says. If you look at actions instead of words, it is easy to see that a large number of blacks and women were fired only because they were black and women. Ditto to LGBTQ. There was no review of any kind of any of their records. They didn't really try to hide it. If you really are interested, it is easy to find.
I am not interested.
I do not believe the propaganda machine that is our mainstream media.
I only find it interesting that no one mentions the comments from Buria or Parnell.
 
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
DEI is over bro. You get promoted if the boss thinks you're the best person for the job.

We're not reserving 3 spots for women and 2 spots for blacks and 1.5 spots for trans biracial meta humans.

No more DEI.
Thank goodness Hegseth did a deep dive and did his due diligence to block dozens of promotions of exemplary lifetime military personnel. I think he is three or four levels above then on the chain of the command. So extra kudos for him for being able to coordinate this while managing the Iran War.
 
Last edited:
here is the official promotion list.


at the very least it can be stated that there are no women out of 22 individuals on the list.

statistically speaking, there should be 3 women that were promoted.
Here we go again. Why 3? Don’t women make up 50% of the population. You do realize meeting quotas based on a country’s gender and racial makeup is insane
 
Also GPA has been shown to be the greatest indicator of college success so if you are starting anywhere you would start there instead of SAT. It also assumes that things like essays and extracurriculars don't matter.




Subjective factors should be given some consideration, but the objective factors should be the prerequisite. The baseline.
 
Thank goodness Hegseth did a deep dive and did his due diligence to block dozens of promotions of exemplary lifetime military personnel. I think he is three or four levels above then on the chain of the command. So extra kudos for him for being able to coordinate this while managing the Iran War.
Yeah he used all of that merit based military brainpower to device a superlative tactical strategy in Iran.
 
Thank goodness Hegseth did a deep dive and did his due diligence to block dozens of promotions of exemplary lifetime military personnel. I think he is three or four levels above then on the chain of the command. So extra kudos for him for being able to coordinate this while managing the Iran War.
Dude you give Hegseth too much credit for 3D chess. The guy is dumb as a box of rocks. This is his 3D chess strategy:

Hegseth is installing officers who agree with his policies and will be loyal, while at the same time passing over other deserving officers. He is also have targeting certain officers because of their race, gender or association with diversity and inclusion policies.


Its not hard to see.
 
Dude you give Hegseth too much credit for 3D chess. The guy is dumb as a box of rocks. This is his 3D chess strategy:

Hegseth is installing officers who agree with his policies and will be loyal, while at the same time passing over other deserving officers. He is also have targeting certain officers because of their race, gender or association with diversity and inclusion policies.


Its not hard to see.
I think my sarcasm comes through poorly on the internet.


This gives work satisfaction survey under Trump (spoiler: it sucks). Here is Hegseth:

"Meanwhile, the workforce registered a score of only 9.1% when asked whether Secretary of War Pete Hegseth’s political leadership team generates high levels of motivation in the workforce."

But he beats Scott Bessent, Kristi Noem, RFK Jr. who are also in the single digits!
 
Here we go again. Why 3? Don’t women make up 50% of the population. You do realize meeting quotas based on a country’s gender and racial makeup is insane
He did proved any reason to stop their promotion. Nothing!!!

Just that they are woman. That is what is insane.
 
I think my sarcasm comes through poorly on the internet.


This gives work satisfaction survey under Trump (spoiler: it sucks). Here is Hegseth:

"Meanwhile, the workforce registered a score of only 9.1% when asked whether Secretary of War Pete Hegseth’s political leadership team generates high levels of motivation in the workforce."

But he beats Scott Bessent, Kristi Noem, RFK Jr. who are also in the single digits!
It's bad.

But the current cabinet members (including the fired and resigned ones) up against these merit tests....starting with Hegseth.
 
I am quoting studies. You are quoting your personal feelings.

Am I?


Most selective universities have returned to test required or test optional but preferred policies over the past few years. The University of CA seems to be the last institution hanging on to this failed experiment.

Ask admissions officers at any selective university around the country what the influence of grade inflation is in the evaluation of applications for undergraduate admissions, and why AP test scores are being valued to such a degree.

This isn't a minor difference of opinion. There is consensus.
 
Last edited:
Am I?


Most selective universities have returned to test required or test optional but preferred policies over the past few years. The University of CA seems to be the last institution hanging on to this failed experiment.

Ask admissions officers at any selective university around the country what the influence of grade inflation is in the evaluation of applications for undergraduate admissions, and why AP test scores are being valued to such a degree.

This isn't a minor difference of opinion. There is consensus.
Despite what you say here, there are multiple studies showing GPA as the strongest predictor of college success. Many suggest using both standardized testing and GPA but if using one GPA alone gives a better prediction.

Here is a study performed by the ACT itself. Even it does not suggest using ACT or other standardized testing as the one best predictor. If anyone would have a financial incentive to adopt your opinion, it would be them, dont you think?
 

Attachments

I think my sarcasm comes through poorly on the internet.


This gives work satisfaction survey under Trump (spoiler: it sucks). Here is Hegseth:

"Meanwhile, the workforce registered a score of only 9.1% when asked whether Secretary of War Pete Hegseth’s political leadership team generates high levels of motivation in the workforce."

But he beats Scott Bessent, Kristi Noem, RFK Jr. who are also in the single digits!
A lot of you all pay way more attention to these things than me, but I have trouble putting Bessent in the same category as many of the other cabinet members. Bessent has accomplished something and seems intelligent across some complex discussion categories. He's a gay Soros acolyte, so not exactly your prototypical Trump "yes man." His success and transcendence of political parties may indicate some strong Epstein-class vibes, though??

Please enlighten me in a non-Huffpo way as to how he is as inept as Noem et al.
 
A lot of you all pay way more attention to these things than me, but I have trouble putting Bessent in the same category as many of the other cabinet members. Bessent has accomplished something and seems intelligent across some complex discussion categories. He's a gay Soros acolyte, so not exactly your prototypical Trump "yes man." His success and transcendence of political parties may indicate some strong Epstein-class vibes, though??

Please enlighten me in a non-Huffpo way as to how he is as inept as Noem et al.

Notwithstanding thoughts on execution, there is no doubt that Marco Rubio and Scott Bessent have the requisite knowledge and experience for their positions. This is part of the reason why both of them had overwhelming support from both Republicans and Democrats for their posts. I think Rubio had near 100% approval and Bessent had at least 15 Democrats giving endorsement. This is more of anomaly in the current administration instead of a rule. The vast majority of cabinet secretary's are wholly unqualified for their positions. The likes of RFK, Noem, Gabbard, Hegseth, and many many others are woefully unqualified for their posts and yet denigrate others as being hired for DEI.

With that said I am deeply disappointed that Bessent has been completely silent as far as I know over the very inflammatory homophobic comments of Andy Ogles. Specifically Ogles said that "homosexual people" have no place in US Society. Bessent, a beneficiary of gay marriage laws himself, should have absolutely condemned this but he didn't. That is morally weak in my opinion.
 
Here we go again. Why 3? Don’t women make up 50% of the population. You do realize meeting quotas based on a country’s gender and racial makeup is insane
because women do not make up 50% of the military.

they make up 17% of active-duty force. currently, high level women make up about half of that 17%.

the lack of women in military is in large part societal, and the military is not responsible for who applies.

but for those who apply and enter service, they should be represented in all layers of status equally. or not because of "racism against white males"...
 
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
because women do not make up 50% of the military.

they make up 17% of active-duty force. currently, high level women make up about half of that 17%.

the lack of women in military is in large part societal, and the military is not responsible for who applies.

but for those who apply and enter service, they should be represented in all layers of status equally. or not because of "racism against white males"...
You finally get it! I knew we could get you there. Just like every other area we were discussing. I’m proud of you

You agree, the lack of a certain gender or racial group in a particular vocation or field of study is in large part societal, and that vocation or field is not responsible for who applies.

Or is that only true when you’re trying to make an argument?
 
You finally get it! I knew we could get you there. Just like every other area we were discussing. I’m proud of you

You agree, the lack of a certain gender or racial group in a particular vocation or field of study is in large part societal, and that vocation or field is not responsible for who applies.

Or is that only true when you’re trying to make an argument?
Society has a stigma even now about women in active duty combat roles.

It applies a lot less to other vocations.

You missed the last part of what he said which is the more impt part

but for those who apply and enter service, they should be represented in all layers of status equally. or not because of "racism against white males"...
 
Society has a stigma even now about women in active duty combat roles.

It applies a lot less to other vocations.

You missed the last part of what he said which is the more impt part

but for those who apply and enter service, they should be represented in all layers of status equally. or not because of "racism against white males"...
No. There is no reasonable way to get equal representation in each layer of military service. We are not using a recipe to recreate the same cake every time. You are advocating for equal outcomes. The just thing would be equal opportunity. There should be, and are, processes to prevent discriminatory behavior. Discrimination should be aggressively fought when present. Conflating this to equal representation at each level of service is an absurd extreme that would be inherently discriminatory, and contrary to choosing the best people for the job.
 
Notwithstanding thoughts on execution, there is no doubt that Marco Rubio and Scott Bessent have the requisite knowledge and experience for their positions. This is part of the reason why both of them had overwhelming support from both Republicans and Democrats for their posts. I think Rubio had near 100% approval and Bessent had at least 15 Democrats giving endorsement. This is more of anomaly in the current administration instead of a rule. The vast majority of cabinet secretary's are wholly unqualified for their positions. The likes of RFK, Noem, Gabbard, Hegseth, and many many others are woefully unqualified for their posts and yet denigrate others as being hired for DEI.

With that said I am deeply disappointed that Bessent has been completely silent as far as I know over the very inflammatory homophobic comments of Andy Ogles. Specifically Ogles said that "homosexual people" have no place in US Society. Bessent, a beneficiary of gay marriage laws himself, should have absolutely condemned this but he didn't. That is morally weak in my opinion.
Thanks for the sound and thoughtful response.

Speaking up for those with no voice is a noble and meaningful pursuit. This is different than feeling the need to speak out against every dumb thing people put out there. Releasing a statement, making a post and/or changing one’s avatar is not the morally superior, brave response some think it is any more than posting flags and eagles makes one a “patriot.”

Sometimes ignoring nonsense rather than elevating it with a response is best.
 
No. There is no reasonable way to get equal representation in each layer of military service. We are not using a recipe to recreate the same cake every time. You are advocating for equal outcomes. The just thing would be equal opportunity. There should be, and are, processes to prevent discriminatory behavior. Discrimination should be aggressively fought when present. Conflating this to equal representation at each level of service is an absurd extreme that would be inherently discriminatory, and contrary to choosing the best people for the job.
What many on the right (and even the left) forget is that during the Supreme Court decision that struck down affirmative action in college admissions, Justice Roberts in the majority decision said two things.

1) Colleges are well within their right to look at each individual applicants attributes such as things that they have overcome (including racism) in making decisions.

2) Race based decisions are important in insuring a diverse military and should be kept in place.

Go back and look at the decision. This is what was said. It is brushed aside by those on the right trying to make a point similar to how those who want the Second Amendment to say what their agenda holds conveniently leaves out the part about the militia.