- Joined
- Nov 24, 2004
- Messages
- 11,713
- Reaction score
- 16,075
contingency lynch stagg until he dies
Do you think this will make him die faster?contingency lynch stagg until he dies
Do you think this will make him die faster?
Do you have proof of this? What would you do if Stagg lynch avoids again?No, but eventually it will have to work. Not like anyone else can be lynched anyway, might as well feel really good about my vote.
Yes I must have sorry. Can you point me to it please?
###unlynch jahboi### for now
What do these numbers mean?3194, 3200
I believe they are neutral.So I've got some bad news... for you 😉
You're not going to be able to lynch me tomorrow. Allie and I are neutral masons. You should probably look for some actual wolves.
I know what you're thinking, "How do we know you're telling the truth?" Well, let's see. Who have we tried to kill? SAR. And... no one else. Not one villager. And I pushed to get Stagg lynched. I know that doesn't seem very neutral of us, in fact, it's downright villagery. Well, that's kind of my point. Why do you want to kill the neutral people who are helping y'all out?
Well you definitely aren't that since saying it on thread yourself results in a mod kill.Allie and I are neutral masons
Well you definitely aren't that since saying it on thread yourself results in a mod kill.
Well that is patently false.directly revealing WHO your character is, could have some positive or negative consequences based on who your character is, so consider that carefully.
Get out of here.Well you definitely aren't that since saying it on thread yourself results in a mod kill.
Well that is patently false.
1) you can’t directly quote from your role pm, but you can say what your role is.
2) this is not saying who their character is just their role.
3) you can reveal who your character is just have to deal with the consequences,
So all in all, you are 100% wrong. Not that I care but as a formerly frequent mod, I hate when people don’t know the basics of the rules for a game.
It's 100% true because this mod has been very specific about it in pm. For reference he apparently discussed it in dead chat last game because we are the only site that doesn't have it as a rule. I made a huge stink about it in my pm.Get out of here.
This is what I was talking about here.I was told I can imply things. I feel this implies something
Also when this game is over I hope you realize what a condescending thing this is to say.Not that I care but as a formerly frequent mod, I hate when people don’t know the basics of the rules for a game.
Hmmmm wonder why we would know this is a rule in this game??@Navilly I expect you to tell them to redact as you said you would to me unless this doesn't apply to them because it ISNT ACTUALLY THEIR ROLE
So how do you explain WZ revealing that she sends items?@Navilly I expect you to tell them to redact as you said you would to me unless this doesn't apply to them because it ISNT ACTUALLY THEIR ROLE
Stupidly, it's a rule regarding one specific role. I have no idea why is that is the case and yet here we are.So how do you explain WZ revealing that she sends items?
So there’s a technicality I’m exploiting here. We’re not masons in the sense that we started with the same role PM. We have separate PMs and then our pack PM. I feel that the role fits this site’s idea of masons, even though it’s not quite the textbook definition. Is that fair?@Navilly I expect you to tell them to redact as you said you would to me unless this doesn't apply to them because it ISNT ACTUALLY THEIR ROLE
Yeah that would be a technicality lolSo there’s a technicality I’m exploiting here. We’re not masons in the sense that we started with the same role PM. We have separate PMs and then our pack PM. I feel that the role fits this site’s idea of masons, even though it’s not quite the textbook definition. Is that fair?
That's actually not masons at all, so saying you are such is misleading tbh. Unless you were told "Allie is x affiliation" in your role PM.So there’s a technicality I’m exploiting here. We’re not masons in the sense that we started with the same role PM. We have separate PMs and then our pack PM. I feel that the role fits this site’s idea of masons, even though it’s not quite the textbook definition. Is that fair?
Why thank you WZ, perhaps you can say it louder for SOVThat's actually not masons at all, so saying you are such is misleading tbh. Unless you were told "Allie is x affiliation" in your role PM.
@StayingPositive2017 The traditional mason rule of not revealing has actually been used here off and on. More often in basic games than games like this, but it is a thing, and is part of the traditional parameters of the role.
@StartingoverVet too though I think he was referring to the overall rules of the game and didn't realize you were specifically talking about mason rulesThat's actually not masons at all, so saying you are such is misleading tbh. Unless you were told "Allie is x affiliation" in your role PM.
@StayingPositive2017 The traditional mason rule of not revealing has actually been used here off and on. More often in basic games than games like this, but it is a thing, and is part of the traditional parameters of the role.
I posted my required clarification; I'm not going to say anymore about it.That's actually not masons at all, so saying you are such is misleading tbh. Unless you were told "Allie is x affiliation" in your role PM.
My point is if you have separate PMs you cannot know for sure what her affiliation is, whether she might be leaning more antagonist than you are, etc etc, so your vouch is not any stronger than anyone else's vouches for packmates. And I get very twitchy about people using the term "mason" losely, not that anyone here would remember my Dr. Seuss PTSD.I posted my required clarification; I'm not going to say anymore about it.
Personally, I think my play this game has been in line with my village play, despite being neutral.
I'm also a mason purist. Neighbors or bust.My point is if you have separate PMs you cannot know for sure what her affiliation is, whether she might be leaning more antagonist than you are, etc etc, so your vouch is not any stronger than anyone else's vouches for packmates. And I get very twitchy about people using the term "mason" losely, not that anyone here would remember my Dr. Seuss PTSD.
This is where I'm getting confused, seems to be referring to the attack on the bounty hunters the night before, which was the "demon", but the dark wizard being referred to here is SAR?“You’re insufferable.” As she turned away from the man, a dark wizard caught her eye. “That bastard.”
She went into a full sprint towards the direction the dark wizard was headed. She rounded the corner, and immediately swung her axe his way. Ice shattered immediately, he had blocked the axe with a make shift ice shield.
She stared him down. “You attacked us, unprovoked. And now I will kill you and take whatever worthless possessions you have on you.”
Rolls?************************************************
*lifts up shirt to reveal my many roles*
************************************************
****************************Rolls?![]()
This to me indicates that we're waiting on someone in particular to be able to kill StaggMaybe I will eventually get a challenge worthy of me. Eventually…
Could a loophole be blocking/jailing you?I got burned...so that's not SAR. Lethal consequences if I perform any actions the next two nights.
Remains to be seen whether I'll automatically die since I technically have to move groups every night
I got burned...so that's not SAR. Lethal consequences if I perform any actions the next two nights.
Remains to be seen whether I'll automatically die since I technically have to move groups every night
Mods said it was a passive vs active ability dilemma, and the best thing would be to not submit and action and see what happened. Dunno if a blocking loophole would work or not tbh, seems like it would though.Could a loophole be blocking/jailing you?
So I've got some bad news... for you 😉
You're not going to be able to lynch me tomorrow. Allie and I are neutral masons. You should probably look for some actual wolves.
I know what you're thinking, "How do we know you're telling the truth?" Well, let's see. Who have we tried to kill? SAR. And... no one else. Not one villager. And I pushed to get Stagg lynched. I know that doesn't seem very neutral of us, in fact, it's downright villagery. Well, that's kind of my point. Why do you want to kill the neutral people who are helping y'all out?
Forgot that.This to me indicates that we're waiting on someone in particular to be able to kill Stagg
(still catching up on writeups, this was from Act 1 scene 12)
4th wall break!The character stares straight out of the page, at you, yes you. “I am talking about the game we are a part of and the musings we are providing for a bunch of health field inclined people (and 1 pilot). Maybe they want to hear a nice little pop culture reference, that brings them into the moment of the witchcraft of the moment. Maybe they want to escape their realities and invest themselves within us, the characters. But no, you have to ruin it, don’t you.”
I was also burned. Same deal, no actions for two nights or possible consequences.mpm was burned also with similar limitations. Who else was burned?