This is to your credit. So now I'd like to ask: Do you think everyone did that? (Hint: the answer is "no" and you have to look no farther than this thread to see that). And in the end, how did it change your approach? Did you intentionally not answer questions correctly based on what you learned about the process? Do you believe that people who didn't read up on it like you did would answer questions incorrectly on purpose? So, what did you gain from learning all about that process?
No, I think they stress themselves out over meaningless things, worry about curves which don't exist, and possibly change their dates to avoid being in the summer when 'the curve is harsher' (something many people say). Plus, in the end, they lose respect in conversations because game changing or not, being uninformed is not seen as a good thing.
Moreso, I judge people who don't even bother to learn the details about their own life's aspirations (and the path to them), and I gained my own respect.
At least in your head you do. And "hypothetical" isn't the right word here. Students learn enough to get by.
No, you very clearly implied that most people don't know the match algorithm. I do, which is my point. I know 'hypothetical' wasn't correct here, but what I was trying to imply is that, just because I am responding to your version of things, where most people don't bother to know jack, doesn't mean that I'm assuming that version is correct.
I shared that sentiment, but in the end, it really didn't help.
Maybe it didn't improve your Match, but that doesn't mean it didn't help.
I'm sorry if this discussion didn't go the way you hoped, but you should really consider working on your communication style. You've invented your own debate and assigned me a side. I don't think you're naive at all - of course people should inform themselves about important events in their lives. But that's never been the discussion here. This isn't about what people should do - it's about what they are doing. What they should do is a discussion for another time.
The discussion went fine - I'm not upset or hurt over it in any way. I DO feel that you were treating me as a naive person, perhaps because I WAS discussing whether people
should do these things. You never once stated before that 'of course people should inform themselves about important events in their lives' prior to this...and that was ALL I was debating. I don't give a damn about what most people
do do, I try to figure out what people
should do and hold myself (and, yes, others) to that when possible.
Sounds like we were having two separate discussions and thinking we were in the same one.