- Joined
- Apr 28, 2006
- Messages
- 6,133
- Reaction score
- 2,369
This is the generic message that means you have gone to the Adcom and very little else. Since, like the message says, they only send out offers at certain times, you cannot tell if you will be accepted or 'deferred' to the next set of offers.
I think people who are rejected do not have to wait until the dates b/c there is a set point at which people are flat out rejected (3.5). They get the message immediately. So +Ve I don't think you will be rejected, at least not at this point.
I am going to repost something I posted earlier just to clear some things up for people.
Here is how the admissions process works at MCV:
Initially you send in a primary application and a 'file reviewer' reads it and gives you a 'priority score'. Based on that score you are granted a secondary or not.
When you send in the secondary the file reviewer reads it and gives you another score. This score will rank you for getting an interview. When they get to the group that has your score, you will be allowed to sign up for an interview.
Then you go in for your interview. You do the normal things, meet with the dean, do the interview, take the tour. You interviewer then scores the interview.
Usually every Monday the Adcom meets to discuss the candidates. MCV is genearlly backed-up so they discuss people who came in few weeks before. There are, if I remember correctly, 30 people on the Adcom but not everybody can make it each week. Your application is projected on a screen and everyone in the adcom looks over it and begins to find weaknesses in the application. Your file reviewer and your interviewer are your 'advocates.' They are the people on your side and are trying to promote you. When someone brings up a concern about your application it is their job to say, "Oh well in the essays he/she addressed this in such and such manner." OR "we talked about that in the interview and she/he had this to say about that." Unless you pissed them off or really are a weak applicant, they are going to be a major help to you.
Anyway, after all the discussion is through, each person present gives you a score on a 1 to 5 scale. 1 being the ideal applicant, Mr or Mrs Perfectmedicalstudent and 5 being the worst score. You can get half points too. So 1.5 is the second best score you can get. So the 'priority scores' from your file review and your interview score really don't go into the final score that ranks you but those numbers will give the rest of the Adcom an idea of how strong the interviewer and file reviewer thought you were.
Once everyone has put in a score for you, they take the highest and lowest score and throw them out to prevent skewing and then average the rest. The average is your 'Score' and it is averaged to 2 decimal places. This score does not change and this is the way that you are ranked if you are put on the waitlist. There of course will need to be 'tie-breakers' between people with the same score. The first tie breaker is undergraduate GPA. The second is MCAT score.
A score of 3.5 or above is an automatic rejection. Below that you are either in or waitlisted. Three years ago the highest (worst) score that was granted admission was a 2.7. A two years ago I believe was a 2.3. Last year it was even lower. The trend has been for better, more qualified students to apply making it harder to get in.
There is very, very little change in the number of IS and OOS applicants that are let in. Every year there are 184 M I's at the beginning of the year. Based on the money given by the Va assembly 104 are instate and 80 are out of state. That really does not change. When the waiting list is created they make 2 waiting lists. One is instate and the other is out-of-state. If an instate kid does not take his offer, that spot is filled by another instate kid not an out-of stater. Same goes for out-of-staters, if one gives up a spot, that spot is filled by an OOS.
Generally the out of state waitlist moves much much faster than the instate list because fewer people from Va give up an acceptance.
I think people who are rejected do not have to wait until the dates b/c there is a set point at which people are flat out rejected (3.5). They get the message immediately. So +Ve I don't think you will be rejected, at least not at this point.
I am going to repost something I posted earlier just to clear some things up for people.
Here is how the admissions process works at MCV:
Initially you send in a primary application and a 'file reviewer' reads it and gives you a 'priority score'. Based on that score you are granted a secondary or not.
When you send in the secondary the file reviewer reads it and gives you another score. This score will rank you for getting an interview. When they get to the group that has your score, you will be allowed to sign up for an interview.
Then you go in for your interview. You do the normal things, meet with the dean, do the interview, take the tour. You interviewer then scores the interview.
Usually every Monday the Adcom meets to discuss the candidates. MCV is genearlly backed-up so they discuss people who came in few weeks before. There are, if I remember correctly, 30 people on the Adcom but not everybody can make it each week. Your application is projected on a screen and everyone in the adcom looks over it and begins to find weaknesses in the application. Your file reviewer and your interviewer are your 'advocates.' They are the people on your side and are trying to promote you. When someone brings up a concern about your application it is their job to say, "Oh well in the essays he/she addressed this in such and such manner." OR "we talked about that in the interview and she/he had this to say about that." Unless you pissed them off or really are a weak applicant, they are going to be a major help to you.
Anyway, after all the discussion is through, each person present gives you a score on a 1 to 5 scale. 1 being the ideal applicant, Mr or Mrs Perfectmedicalstudent and 5 being the worst score. You can get half points too. So 1.5 is the second best score you can get. So the 'priority scores' from your file review and your interview score really don't go into the final score that ranks you but those numbers will give the rest of the Adcom an idea of how strong the interviewer and file reviewer thought you were.
Once everyone has put in a score for you, they take the highest and lowest score and throw them out to prevent skewing and then average the rest. The average is your 'Score' and it is averaged to 2 decimal places. This score does not change and this is the way that you are ranked if you are put on the waitlist. There of course will need to be 'tie-breakers' between people with the same score. The first tie breaker is undergraduate GPA. The second is MCAT score.
A score of 3.5 or above is an automatic rejection. Below that you are either in or waitlisted. Three years ago the highest (worst) score that was granted admission was a 2.7. A two years ago I believe was a 2.3. Last year it was even lower. The trend has been for better, more qualified students to apply making it harder to get in.
There is very, very little change in the number of IS and OOS applicants that are let in. Every year there are 184 M I's at the beginning of the year. Based on the money given by the Va assembly 104 are instate and 80 are out of state. That really does not change. When the waiting list is created they make 2 waiting lists. One is instate and the other is out-of-state. If an instate kid does not take his offer, that spot is filled by another instate kid not an out-of stater. Same goes for out-of-staters, if one gives up a spot, that spot is filled by an OOS.
Generally the out of state waitlist moves much much faster than the instate list because fewer people from Va give up an acceptance.