This was news a month or two ago, but I just saw it pop up on Facebook again today. Naturally, I started skimming through the comments and was not particularly surprised at the deluge of dentist bashing. Most of the criticism centered around the cost of orthodontic care and how orthodontists are "ripping the public off." I respect the ingenuity and research Amos Dudley put into doing this, but I think most of the news surrounding it fails to recognize some key information.
He had braces in junior high, and was correcting crowded teeth as a result of not wearing his retainer in the years after his care. He probably has a class I bite, was fairly straight forward and didn't require any major changes in occlusion. He also has advanced training in 3D printing and design, and also had access to a lot of equipment, computers, and software that the general public doesn't. So the $100, or whatever the media says it cost him to fabricate the models/guards, is misleading. The cost of orthodontic care covers all of the overhead of a business (buying this equipment, training/compensating staff, paying rent, stocking the office with dental/business materials, malpractice insurance, benefits, etc, etc, the list goes on), and of course the training and expertise required to treat orthodontic cases comprehensively -- none of these expenses are ever mentioned by the media.
Another misinformed response that I've heard in reference to this case is how this technology will somehow revolutionize orthodontics... this technology is utilized in dentistry and orthodontics every day and is nothing new. Digital impressions, CAD/CAM crowns, bridges, onlays, etc, are becoming increasingly common - I was surprised that after seeing news of Dudley's case people think this will turn the practice of dentistry upside down. Dental care is expensive, and I sympathize with those who struggle to afford proper care, but I think the media's portrayal of this news story is seriously unbalanced.