ABA Basic Exam 2015

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
A

acidbase1

Membership Revoked
Removed
10+ Year Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2011
Messages
640
Reaction score
303
Hello people, so I am gearing up to take this exam, few questions.

1) Is the exam going to be the same as last year? I know the 2014 exam was 4.5 hours, ours is going to be around 6 hours. Did they add questions or something?

2) Wasnt the 2014 exam 250 questions long?

3) So the pass rate was about 96.5% in 2014, is there any indication that it will be raised this year? Also, the passing percent correct in terms of questions was around 62% correct wasnt it?

4) Lastly, how did you folks study? I am using pass machine and Start prep (AKA Stanford course). Do you guys has further suggestions for resources?

I know some of the questions are probably impossible to know unless you have a mole inside the ABA, but any help is greatly appreciated. Take care
Members don't see this ad.
 
I've been listening to pass machine, then doing m5 questions related to that and then reading M&M anything I don't feel I have a good handle on.

Been taking notes on the questions, so last week or two before exam going to review the pass machine handouts, go over my answers/notes to m5, and then do Hall and/or Start Prep question bank with any time left.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Members don't see this ad :)
acidbase1 said:
3) So the pass rate was about 96.5% in 2014, is there any indication that it will be raised this year? Also, the passing percent correct in terms of questions was around 62% correct wasnt it?
Click to expand...
I fully expect the pass rate to drop to around 93-95%. Just a hunch. The previous pass rate of ~97% is exceedingly high for any standardized exam administered by the ABA.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Thanks gents, I'm just uneasy taking an exam with so many unknowns. Hence, I knew pretty much exactly where I stood walking into the USMLE examinations.

I really hope they don't ratchet up the pass cutoff, not that I plan on being anywhere near the 10th percentile, but it's nice to have that in the back of your mind.
 
I'll be using Hall and M5 almost exclusively, should be more than enough to pass if you really read and understand the explanations.
 
Aren't only the first four sections geared solely towards the basic science section in hall? The rest of the qbank would be a waste of time
 
The bar will be higher. Not sure how much, just higher. This was communicated to our PD by the ABA.
 
My guess is 90%, hopefully they don't make this ridiculous like everything else
 
Complete bs giving us a board in the middle of our training, only specialty that does this
 
kingcer0x said:
big difference between a board after PGY 4 and a board after PGY 2

As said in a previous post, this test is going nowhere, given the performance of CA-2s compared to CA-3s on the latest ITEs
Click to expand...

Please expand, what do you mean it's going nowhere?

The Bulls!t part of it all is that it's gonna make passing the subsequent tests that much more difficult
 
Members don't see this ad :)
I see what you meant, going nowhere as in the CA2s out performed the CA3s. Yeah, and as I mentioned, the curve is just gonna get steeper.
 
acidbase1 said:
Hello people, so I am gearing up to take this exam, few questions.

1) Is the exam going to be the same as last year? I know the 2014 exam was 4.5 hours, ours is going to be around 6 hours. Did they add questions or something?

2) Wasnt the 2014 exam 250 questions long?

3) So the pass rate was about 96.5% in 2014, is there any indication that it will be raised this year? Also, the passing percent correct in terms of questions was around 62% correct wasnt it?

4) Lastly, how did you folks study? I am using pass machine and Start prep (AKA Stanford course). Do you guys has further suggestions for resources?

I know some of the questions are probably impossible to know unless you have a mole inside the ABA, but any help is greatly appreciated. Take care
Click to expand...


How did you find out the basic exam this year is going to be 6 hours. On the ABA website basic exam blueprint it says the exam is 4 hours and 40 mins and 250 questions, although it also says the exam will be offered in July as well.
Also are we sure the exam is pass/fail again? And why wouldn't they keep about the same pass/fail rate??
Thanks for your responses!
 
I hate to say it but I have put very little effort into this exam especially since it is a pass fail. I scored approx 80 percentile on the ITE and I have heard that this test is just so random there is no use in studying. Everyone I have talked to about this test says studying for it is almost impossible bc of its randomness. Especially since last years pass rate was 97%
 
I'm curious to hear everyone's thoughts on this exam...
 
A few comments:

Time: Plenty of time given to take the exam.
Software quality: overall poor. Crashed on me 2x. UI design was also ****ty if compared to the USMLE exams..
Content: Mostly reasonable, some stuff that was reasonable but I didnt know. Also a few random q's or things that made me think "who gives a ****."
Not worried about passing as I score well on tests.
 
Agree with above.

Overall, the best word my fellow residents have used is it was a "dumb" exam.

"Who gives a ****!" is also a popular sentiment.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Left pretty frustrated. Definitely not a reflection of how I studied :( just hoping for that pass so I can forget about this
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Guillemot said:
A few comments:

Time: Plenty of time given to take the exam.
Software quality: overall poor. Crashed on me 2x. UI design was also ****ty if compared to the USMLE exams..
Content: Mostly reasonable, some stuff that was reasonable but I didnt know. Also a few random q's or things that made me think "who gives a ****."
Not worried about passing as I score well on tests.
Click to expand...

Wow you're pretty awesome
 
I thought they questions were written to overtly trick the examinees. ABA are a bunch of cock suckers. That being said, I passed. On to the next hoop
 
Yeah.... Mostly non-clinically relevant minutiae type bull$hit.... Vast majority had me asking "Who the F cares?"
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Anyone know when we will get the results?
 
My PD said we would get the results in September.

That's a really long, agonizing wait.

Then again, some other people are claiming 6 weeks.

My thoughts on the exam? The first section had a bunch of surprisingly easy questions and I burned through it in 30 mins. 15 or so questions I didn't know. Rest of the time on the 1st section I kept going over my answers to make sure I didn't make stupid errors.

However on the 2nd section there were a LOT more "WTF?" moments. Lots of little minutiae that made me wonder how knowing that would help me in the long run.

Could have studied better on anatomy and statistics, however, a lot of my time was spent trying to memorize all the little minutiae for the organ-based systems/clinical assessment. I felt there was a lot more anatomy/statistics than I thought there would be. I also thought there were too many questions about physician impairment as well - and not like "spot the signs of impairment" but specific numbers and stuff.

I also now officially hate Mapleson and Bain circuits and that's all I will say without giving anything else away. I have never seen one of those things in real life in order to appreciate them and really know how they work.

I don't work for StartPrep but I felt like doing their stuff, while tedious, helped reinforce the concepts needed for this exam. Their explanations were a LOT better than Morgan and Mikhail IMO.

Whoever said the exam questions were written to trick the examinees is probably correct. There were a lot of questions where you were stuck with two choices, both of which equally valid, but one slightly better than the other. I think that's the way it has been on the USMLE as well. The M5 question bank as well as StartPrep had a couple of head-scratcher questions like that as well. Was I expecting these type of questions? Yes. Would I LIKE to face them? Absolutely not.

Agree with the software issues - the test crashed on me 3x during the day. Unacceptable.

So basically one big day with one teeny tiny little break in the middle - not like the USMLE - which is what I would have rather preferred.
 
This was a handout given to me by our PD during a CA-1 resident meeting in March...looks official, but maybe the ABA changed things up after this came out.
 

Attachments

  • ABA timeline.jpg
    ABA timeline.jpg
    125 KB · Views: 257
CharleyVCU1988 said:
My PD said we would get the results in September.

That's a really long, agonizing wait.

Then again, some other people are claiming 6 weeks.

My thoughts on the exam? The first section had a bunch of surprisingly easy questions and I burned through it in 30 mins. 15 or so questions I didn't know. Rest of the time on the 1st section I kept going over my answers to make sure I didn't make stupid errors.

However on the 2nd section there were a LOT more "WTF?" moments. Lots of little minutiae that made me wonder how knowing that would help me in the long run.

Could have studied better on anatomy and statistics, however, a lot of my time was spent trying to memorize all the little minutiae for the organ-based systems/clinical assessment. I felt there was a lot more anatomy/statistics than I thought there would be. I also thought there were too many questions about physician impairment as well - and not like "spot the signs of impairment" but specific numbers and stuff.

I also now officially hate Mapleson and Bain circuits and that's all I will say without giving anything else away. I have never seen one of those things in real life in order to appreciate them and really know how they work.

I don't work for StartPrep but I felt like doing their stuff, while tedious, helped reinforce the concepts needed for this exam. Their explanations were a LOT better than Morgan and Mikhail IMO.

Whoever said the exam questions were written to trick the examinees is probably correct. There were a lot of questions where you were stuck with two choices, both of which equally valid, but one slightly better than the other. I think that's the way it has been on the USMLE as well. The M5 question bank as well as StartPrep had a couple of head-scratcher questions like that as well. Was I expecting these type of questions? Yes. Would I LIKE to face them? Absolutely not.

Agree with the software issues - the test crashed on me 3x during the day. Unacceptable.

So basically one big day with one teeny tiny little break in the middle - not like the USMLE - which is what I would have rather preferred.
Click to expand...

This is to a tee how I felt...
 
Overall, the exam was poorly executed. ABA seems to be having a lot of software issues -- my exam crashed twice. The first time was halfway through the first question block. Abruptly flashed a "Terminating..." screen, and went to a prometric home screen. I was the first at my test center to experience the problem, so the prometric person didn't know how to fix it at first, then rebooted my test to resume where it left off. Then at least 10 other test takers had the same problem. Then at the end of the second question block, the same thing happened all over again.

The purpose of this exam was supposed to be to test CA1s understanding of fundamental knowledge for anesthesia training. However, much of the exam was factual recall, often times not well suited for multiple choice questions. Obviously I can't give any specifics. But some general points - when asking the prevalence of a condition in a population -- it's best not to have answer choices within 2% of eachother ....ex: 4, 6, 8, 10%. The answer depends on the study you happen to read, method of reporting, and half the answer choices probably fall in the study's margin of error anyway. Some questions didn't pertain to anesthesia at all (For example, topics such as personal computing hardware -- my theory: the ABA is trying to foster a new generation of computer savvy anesthesiologists -- they need someone who can build them some exam software that won't crash for half the test takers...:) )

There was no multimedia - occasionally a graph. Question stems were short. There was plenty of time. I agree that the first question set was easier than the first. Coming back from the break into the second set had a particularly difficult series of questions, then got better towards the end.

Overall, the ITE was a better test in terms of question quality and relevance to anesthesia practice.

If anything, this exam detracted from my CA1 anesthesia experience. For example, time spent obsessing over memorizing second messengers, should have been spent getting comfortable with blocks on my regional rotation. This year has been focused on prepping for board exams -- things like research, presentations, medical leadership activities -- all things that I consider to be an important part of my education, all went on the back burner to prepare for a high-stakes exam.

Best of luck to all those who took the exam! To future generations, you have my condolences :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 users
BigMAC3 said:
Overall, the exam was poorly executed. ABA seems to be having a lot of software issues -- my exam crashed twice. The first time was halfway through the first question block. Abruptly flashed a "Terminating..." screen, and went to a prometric home screen. I was the first at my test center to experience the problem, so the prometric person didn't know how to fix it at first, then rebooted my test to resume where it left off. Then at least 10 other test takers had the same problem. Then at the end of the second question block, the same thing happened all over again.

The purpose of this exam was supposed to be to test CA1s understanding of fundamental knowledge for anesthesia training. However, much of the exam was factual recall, often times not well suited for multiple choice questions. Obviously I can't give any specifics. But some general points - when asking the prevalence of a condition in a population -- it's best not to have answer choices within 2% of eachother ....ex: 4, 6, 8, 10%. The answer depends on the study you happen to read, method of reporting, and half the answer choices probably fall in the study's margin of error anyway. Some questions didn't pertain to anesthesia at all (For example, topics such as personal computing hardware -- my theory: the ABA is trying to foster a new generation of computer savvy anesthesiologists -- they need someone who can build them some exam software that won't crash for half the test takers...:) )

There was no multimedia - occasionally a graph. Question stems were short. There was plenty of time. I agree that the first question set was easier than the first. Coming back from the break into the second set had a particularly difficult series of questions, then got better towards the end.

Overall, the ITE was a better test in terms of question quality and relevance to anesthesia practice.

If anything, this exam detracted from my CA1 anesthesia experience. For example, time spent obsessing over memorizing second messengers, should have been spent getting comfortable with blocks on my regional rotation. This year has been focused on prepping for board exams -- things like research, presentations, medical leadership activities -- all things that I consider to be an important part of my education, all went on the back burner to prepare for a high-stakes exam.

Best of luck to all those who took the exam! To future generations, you have my condolences :)
Click to expand...

I've preached this to my attendings time and time again. The past three months of residency have suffered BIG-TIME due to this exam preparation. This is complete bullsh but at the end of the day this exam is all abt making money, so nothing will change.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
acidbase1 said:
I've preached this to my attendings time and time again. The past three months of residency have suffered BIG-TIME due to this exam preparation. This is complete bullsh but at the end of the day this exam is all abt making money, so nothing will change.
Click to expand...

Actually, the new exam structure of basic + advanced + applied is $775 + $775 + $2100 which is $3650, and the old format was part 1 + part 2 was $1550 + $2100 = $3650

So it costs the same...

I think the ABA actually just wants us to study earlier...
 
I want to send a formal complaint to someone. This impacted patient care in a big way. Who could actually do something?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Clearly I wasn't referring to the aba
 
The ABA exams almost always contain questions that are being trialed to see how they perform on an exam. Until they get some data on how they do, these questions don't count and are not graded. It has always been this way. I have heard that in the past, as many as 25 of these questions exist. Most often, they are placed in the second half of the exam. For as long as I can recall, people have complained that the second half of the exam was much tougher than the first. I suspect that these non graded questions are a large part of that perception.
Results have been said to be coming out mid July.
 
pgg said:
OK. So elaborate. How did the existence of the ABA Basic exam impact patient care?
Click to expand...
Maybe he is talking about the fact that it was very difficult to get all of the residents out on that Friday to take the exam. The Saturday option was relatively non-existent in many testing centers across the country. It was a bit of a fiasco. The ABA is well aware of this issue.
If the complaint is that you had to study while taking care of patients, that is likely not valid and is not the fault of the ABA, IMHO.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
That's BS. While working 70-80 hours a week, trying to study an additional 30 for boards this early in training is unreasonable. We have ACGME hour restrictions for a reason. I wasn't alone when I say fatigue lead to mistakes specifically caused by the extra load of this exam. Problem is, we live in a medical world where it isn't okay to show weakness, so nobody says anything
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
acidbase1 said:
That's BS. While working 70-80 hours a week, trying to study an additional 30 for boards this early in training is unreasonable. We have ACGME hour restrictions for a reason. I wasn't alone when I say fatigue lead to mistakes specifically caused by the extra load of this exam. Problem is, we live in a medical world where it isn't okay to show weakness, so nobody says anything
Click to expand...
I respect your frustration, but this is not really a new issue. The only difference is the stakes of the exam are somewhat higher. However, in the past, many programs put residents on probation or let them go for low ITE scores prior to the Basic Exam. In addition, prior to duty hours restrictions, the hours were way worse ( I recall a few 120 hour weeks). Residency is a challenging time in your life, there is no doubt. However, it has always been challenging. The challenges have shifted somewhat, but they have always been there. The issue of fatigue management has always been a reality that needs to be watched closely, with or without the new exam. I think today's resident is being asked to do more in less time. A whole bunch of it is data entry stuff now that everything is computerized (Case logs/duty hours/faculty and rotation evals/ACGME surveys/constant barrage of emails etc). The unspoken pressure is on to stay past to make sure your work is completed.
Best of luck to you on the results of the exam. I have a feeling you did fine.
 
acidbase1 said:
That's BS. While working 70-80 hours a week, trying to study an additional 30 for boards this early in training is unreasonable. We have ACGME hour restrictions for a reason. I wasn't alone when I say fatigue lead to mistakes specifically caused by the extra load of this exam. Problem is, we live in a medical world where it isn't okay to show weakness, so nobody says anything
Click to expand...

I see the problem. It's not the ABA.

Giving you the benefit of the doubt, and believing that you really did spend 30 hours/week studying, you're doing it wrong. You don't need 30 hours per week of study time to prepare for the ABA Basic exam. Seriously, 4 hours per day of reading is far, far above the mean hours/week of reading that anesthesiology residents do. I refer you to this study:

http://www.researchgate.net/publica...on_the_anesthesiology_in-training_examination

Specifically Figure 1:

figure-1-resident-studying.jpg


Note that this is self reported (read: exaggerated) data collected by a program about their residents' reading time. (I congratulate the brave residents who told their PD they were reading 1 hour per week!) Their average reported hours/week is in the 6-7 hour range, with similar ITE performance from most of the residents in the 5-10 hour/week range. One crazy outlier at 20 hours/week ... but the freak put up a 49 on the ITE. (As I recall 43-45 is usually 98-99th percentile for CA2/3 classes.)

30/week is half again as much as that freak.

So either you're exaggerating your 30 hour per week figure (and also exaggerating your 70-80 hour per week clinical load?) or you're devoting way, way more time to board study than everyone else needs to. The former doesn't help discussion. The latter points to inefficient study. Neither amounts to a valid criticism of the ABA for introducing the Basic exam.

The notion that putting an exam of consequence at the end of the CA1 year risks patient safety, because of work hours, is nonsense.


Regardless, if you really did read 30 hours/week your CA1 year, I bet have an awesome knowledge base, which will only magnify what you learn from your clinical experience. That's great. I think too many residents cram and catch up at the end of residency. They end up studying as much or more than the ones who front-loaded their CA1 year reading ... except they didn't have the benefit of all that reading when they were actually learning how to practice.

To the extent that the ABA Basic exam forces residents to front-load their reading, I think it's a great thing.

And given the fact that the for the last ITE, the CA2s (who took the ABA Basic exam) outscored the CA3s (who didn't) ... the exam is here to stay.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
You must log in or register to reply here.
Next unread thread

Similar threads

A7X
ABA Basic Exam high yield topics?
Replies
4
Views
858
A7X
A7X
Dipraman
ABA Advanced 2023
2
Replies
72
Views
9K
vector2
V
pgg
CME Credit For New ABA Cardiac Board Exam?
Replies
11
Views
1K
vector2
V
CardiacIntensivist
ABA's new ACA exam
Replies
25
Views
2K
Bertelman
Bertelman
P
Board vitals for BASIC exam
Replies
3
Views
589
FiO2@21
FiO2@21
Top