The funniest part of podiatry training is that most fellowship directors
didn't do a fellowship. Most 3yr residency attendings
didn't do 3yrs residency. So, how did they get their skills? How did they get so good? Natural talent, interest, motivation, and experience. A fellowship year won't give anyone that (or any additional specialty/cert... still a DPM, still a specialist F&A doc, same scope, same boards/societies).
When you think it through, pretty much all of the 'reason to do fellowship' arguments are BS:
"You get more surgery cases."
...so does a good residency.
"You get to work with top attendings"
...so does a good residency.
"You get to teach"
...what do you think senior/chief residents do? Even pgy1s teach students at good programs with clerks.
"You get to do research"
...again, do a good residency.
"You get different attendings and styles than residency"
...so do 8 fellowships??? You've already seen and read dozens of techniques if you paid attention.
"You will get better jobs"
...nope, you'll be more in debt and will still face the same job market all DPMs face. You will need to sell yourself regardless.
I know it's not fun to talk about, but... (drumroll) ...most PPs are
less likely to hire a fellowship grad as opposed to just a good 3yr residency applicant. And no, most doing fellowship weren't aiming for PP, but that's statistically where they'll be most likely to end up nonetheless. It's not the a fellowship DPM is any worse than a regular grad, but it can be assumed they'll want more salary or % when they can't generate any more income. It's also fair to assume their residency had some deficiency or they didn't have the confidence to go into practice upon 3yrs graduation if they did fellowship track. It's the potential of hiring a diva that will make many think twice. Last, it is not unreasonable to think a fellowship DPM will have one foot out the door of PP almost immediately and be more interested in 'big cases' or letters after their name than just basic generating collections, improving the business, networking in the medical community, etc. Let's face it, big frames or RRA aren't as profitable to most PPs as bread-n-butter (rare exception of places where the PP gets fair/well-insured trauma pts).
[and yes, there's the rare exception of the good residency DPM who does top fellowship Cottom/Hyer/CORE/etc out of interest or wanting even more skills... but that's 0.X% annually... and some of them still do PP jobs afterwards]
What if - hear me out now - every program that has a fellowship shut it down and just let the residents they already have do those cases. And then people instead of doing fellowship just go get a job.
Yes, exactly ^^^
Overall, podiatry significantly lacks volume and diversity of surgical cases for residency training (hence most fellowships).
Getting some of the best attendings' cases back to resident training level would go a looong way to improving that.
It would improve competency and board pass rates... probably compensation.
The other thing would be just shutting down or consolidating or reducing spots at the laggard programs to improve resident case volume, but we all know that won't happen with more schools/grads upcoming and so many DPMs having their paycheck depend on students/residents/associate supply. 😝