OK, so far so good, you're still rational....
Thanks!
It shouldn't be. I can get a prescription for Cocaine HCl, and for the sake of brevity, "Do some Organic Chemistry", isolate the good stuff and smoke it. That's certainly off label isn't it? How do you feel about that?
I am not sure you can get an outpatient prescription for cocaine, it is only used during surgery, right? If I am wrong so be it. More to the point though - doing what you described is more than just off label, you are using it for a purpose other than what it is prescribed for (presumably). What you described is straight up diversion. I am not for diversion.
I have a problem with a student securing an Rx for Adderall for the express purpose of personal gain. If said student has a legitimate need for Adderall and when s/he uses it it gives him/her that same advantage, then so be it.
Now we are getting to the heart of the matter. Almost everyone who takes Adderall takes it for the same reason. What is a legitimate need? I am having a hard time in pharmacology (true story), is that a legitimate need? What exactly is wrong with taking a med for personal gain? Everyone who takes Adderall takes it for personal gain, I assume you mean only people with ADHD should take it - but I am not sure why that is.
Do I have a problem with a man with ED taking Viagra or other PDE-5 inhibs. as Rx'd? Absolutely not.
I suspect you are being deliberately dense here.
The discussion has been about people taking meds even if they don't
really need them. I expressly pointed out my opinion that way more Viagra is dispensed than there are men with ED (well, it's more than my opinion, but I don't care to source it). It is a drug that is used for recreation purposes by men without ED in addition to it's labeled use. That is no secret. Of course my question was about men who take it who do not have ED in the strictest sense of the word. I bet most people do not have a problem with that, nor should they (IMO).
You don't see a problem with people grabbing up Rx's of Vicodin and other opioids for the sole purpose of getting high to be problematic? See, it's not just the performance enhancing angle that bothers me. It's the entire idea, and that encompasses Vicodin fiends too. Why are those pain clinics in FL being targeted for shut down? Because of fraudulent prescriptions. A student going to Dr. McCrackhead for Adderall so he can study for the PCAT better is tantamount to a junky going into a pain clinic for OxyContin so he can get high. It. Is. The. Same. Thing. And it's illegal.
OK here we <partially> agree - I am not in favor of allowing junkies to use fraudulent prescriptions to score their junk. That is wrong/illegal. I can go to my doctor, ask him for something to help me study, and he can oblige if he is so inclined. It is not the same thing, and it certainly is not illegal. Why do you think it is?
If you get a legit script for OxyContin and while you take it prn back pain you get high, then alright, so be it. Same with Adderall. Same with Viagra. It's when you blur that line into habit or dependence that I grow weary and will object every single time.
I am not really talking about habit or dependence though. At least not directly. The question is, is it wrong for students to use ADHD meds in order to study if they don't have ADHD? My answer is no it is not. Now if they are getting the meds "on the street" or by lying to their doctor, etc. that changes the story. But you don't have to do any of that (or so I have been told, I wouldn't know).