Eventing and other sports (grand prix showjumping, reining, etc) all function because the athletes (horses) LOVE it. If you've ever seen or participated, you would be struck by the absolute reverence with which horses are treated - it is all structured around their care. So much money and effort is poured into equine sports medicine. Horses like these - international competitors - are amazing, and would only get to this level because of their love of it.
Lower-level horse sports and horse fancying (trail-riding, etc) have high levels of injury as well... horses (and people) get hurt. High level riding is high profile, and it's more risky... but there's also more skillful!
People who say eventing is abuse... I just can't understand it. It shows ignorance of horses rather than respect. Horses pass daily trot-ups showing their soundness and fitness. No drugs are allowed. Horse health is paramount.
As an active equestrian athlete I would second this. I have a jumper horse and have been known to show hunters as well. And while this is rather different from eventing in that it's jumps in an arena where the footing is generally manicured perfect, and you do at most 18 jumps in a few minutes.
Horses get x-rays and ultrasounds for even minor soreness... and with no horse health insurance it's quite expensive. In the last month my horse has cost well over $1000 in medical bills for what started as a very slight lameness on his front leg, and stayed slight. (He's supposed to start work again this week.) And I'll be honest I'm no where CLOSE to the level Amy Tryon is. Horses that compete at that elite level get the best of the best, costing a fortune. The slightest soreness is reason to call out the best vet, and pay a few hundred dollars just for the vet's opinion, not to mention the treatment.
In instances like this, I question whether such extreme sporting events with animals are necessary... maybe this pushes them too much.
I'd like to see anyone force a horse to jump over fences the horse can't see the other side of. The horse is 1200lbs+ if the horse doesn't want to, it won't.
I wouldn't say thats exactly true. Its paramount as long as its not effecting earnings. For instance, if health was number one, I doubt they would race horses as 2-3 year olds and instead wait until they were older and had maximal bone density to reduce injury. But that would mean years and years of extra feed before the horse produced any income and would never happen.
They race horses as 2-3 years olds partly because older horses tend to be less motivated, heal slower if they get hurt, and the breed raced most commonly tends to not keep weight on after about 4. But, I know several horses that were raced up through 9 years old. Racing doesn't stop after the horse turns 4, but the races tend to be a lot slower, less exciting, have less draw, and make less money all around. It is a money thing, but not just because it costs to feed them for a few years.
I'm talking about equestrian sports, not money-bound racing. I put racing in a different category. Things that happen at the World Equestrian Games or the Olympics are very different than money-centred, bet-centered racing... Horse sports are an art, racing is money.
This is true in some ways. Olympic and World Cup level jumping and dressage is very different from racing in that racing is one of the easiest thing to teach a horse. That's why they can race 3 year olds. You can't train a horse to jump that well, or higher level dressage in that about of time. Olympic horses are young at 12, because it takes SO much training for the horse to be ready for that level.
does anyone know where we can find this video? i think it would be interesting to see. this forum is up b/c it is "a hot topic." no personal attacks should be made.... we should be discussing the topic.
http://video.tinypic.com/player.php?v=664abo2
Surely she wouldn't have intentionally ridden on while the horse was lame.
It seems unlikely she would be cruel to her horse, but even if she didn't care about the horse, surely jumping on a lame horse would also be crazy from a $$$ perspective as I imagine the horse would be valuable.
That horse was probably valued in the mid to upper six figures, if not seven figures.
He was clearly lame -- his head was bobbing and he wanted to trot. In retrospect the rider should have pulled him up immediately instead of asking him to continue, regardless of how close they were to the finish. A rider at that level has to know that this was more than just a ding or shoe. The judges at the time obviously agreed because she got disqualified not withdrawn.
That said, I think it was an error in judgement not any sort of intentional misconduct -- like drugging a lame horse to pass inspection.
Regarding horses in sports, a horse can blow a tendon (or even break a leg) just running around in a pasture.
At any level a rider is dead tired at the end of an XC course. You can see how much the rider's legs move on the horse's sides in the video, when a high-level rider will usually have lower legs so strong that they don't appear to move except over jumps. When a rider is that tired they will not be thinking as clearly as they might be at the start of the course.
When I watched the video even I wondered if the horse had pulled a shoe when he first stumbled. When a horse pulls a shoe they can stumble severely and if the shoe is still flapping they won't canter nicely. At that point in her ride I wouldn't be surprised if she thought the horse had pulled a shoe, was cross-cantering, or had just had a boot slip. A lot of things can happen, and it's very likely that (esp. with as much as she was flopping in the saddle at that point) Amy Tryon did not feel the horse's lameness as such, and did not feel nearly as much of a problem as we can see watching.
It's very common that a horse will not feel nearly as bad as they look. (That can work the other way too, so that they horse feels off even if they don't look lame.)
Why wouldn't it be a conscious thought? Unless your only concern is winning one way or another, consideration for the animal's well being should always be made. Not only that, but if you aren't paying attention to how the horse is moving, how can you (and the horse) efficiently work as a team and expect to succeed?
Anyways, I'm with Spartanvet, the horse's health is much more important than any event, even if you paid $5000+ to compete.
You can't win when you can't ride the rest of the event. The XC is usually the first part of a three day event. To win you have to ride the show jumping and the dressage, and the horse obviously wasn't doing that.
$5000 to compete? That's nothing next to the $500,000+ horses that are entered.