COURT-PODIATRISTS-INSURER
Conn. Supreme Court rejects claim against insurer
HARTFORD, Conn. (AP) The Connecticut Supreme Court says an insurance company did not discriminate by paying lower reimbursements to podiatrists than to other doctors.
In a 6-1 ruling released Friday, the justices said state law prohibits insurers from denying reimbursement, but does not forbid them from paying varying amounts to different specialists.
The justices upheld a Waterbury Superior Court ruling that said reimbursements by Health Net of Connecticut did not violate Connecticut's Unfair Insurance Practices Act. The Connecticut Podiatric Medical Association appealed the decision.
Justice Richard N. Palmer dissented, saying state law forbids insurers from denying reimbursements and discriminating based on how much it reimburses different specialists.
Health Net spokesman Brad Kieffer says the company is pleased by the ruling. Representatives of the podiatrists' group did not immediately return a call seeking comment.
Your thoughts??
Conn. Supreme Court rejects claim against insurer
HARTFORD, Conn. (AP) The Connecticut Supreme Court says an insurance company did not discriminate by paying lower reimbursements to podiatrists than to other doctors.
In a 6-1 ruling released Friday, the justices said state law prohibits insurers from denying reimbursement, but does not forbid them from paying varying amounts to different specialists.
The justices upheld a Waterbury Superior Court ruling that said reimbursements by Health Net of Connecticut did not violate Connecticut's Unfair Insurance Practices Act. The Connecticut Podiatric Medical Association appealed the decision.
Justice Richard N. Palmer dissented, saying state law forbids insurers from denying reimbursements and discriminating based on how much it reimburses different specialists.
Health Net spokesman Brad Kieffer says the company is pleased by the ruling. Representatives of the podiatrists' group did not immediately return a call seeking comment.
Your thoughts??
Last edited: