Another Ethics Question...

  • Thread starter Thread starter LoveBeingHuman:)
  • Start date Start date
This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
L

LoveBeingHuman:)

Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
Okay, this is one that I don't understand: "Would you stop at the scene of a road accident to help the victims, knowing that doing so might bring a malpractice claim towards you?"

I thought that you can't sue a doctor for malpractice unless he or she received monetary compensation from you?

Anyways, here is how I would answer the question:

Several jurisdictions have ruled that, as a human being, you have the moral obligation to come to the aid of others in emergency situations. With respect to ethical laws and my own feelings towards humanitarianism, I will use my skills to come to the help of the victims if the situation immediately requires it. Furthermore, if I am an emergency trained doctor, then the only difference between this situation and one in the emergency room is the available resources. Even if I am not trained in medical emergencies, specifically, I should have sufficient skills and knowledge to prevent the situation from getting worse. In either case, I believe that, in a truly urgent scenario, waiting for professional emergency help to arrive is more likely to cause greater harm to the victim than the obstacles that a bystander physician faces in trying to hold on to the victim's life, such as not having resources and/or experience in emergency situations.

Thoughts?
 
Last edited:
Read the link above. You do not have an affirmative duty to help others who have not sought care from you. On the flip side, you generally cannot be sued for providing emergency care given your actions fall under what a reasonable person would do given the circumstances.

For myself, yes I would respond if at all possible.
 
I see what you guys are saying, but I'm not sure if that's really the main point of the question.
 
Yes, but the point is rendered moot since if you act within the bounds of a reasonable responder, you can't be sued for the most part. That said, if I was in a state where immunity is not granted, I would still stop to render aid. I would at the very least call for help and ensure the scene is safe, and then administer CPR if required (or put on a tourniquet if an amputation was involved or something). That's about as far as I'd go, since I'd have limited resources and fire/rescue would be on the way with better pre-hospital training and better resources.

That wouldn't be my whole answer, but it's pretty close. I'd briefly talk about feeling obligated to help if I can but not wanting to make things worse by going to far, etc.
 
Top Bottom