- Joined
- Oct 9, 2005
- Messages
- 48
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
WhatUpDoc! said:That's not true, by sheer numbers alone, poor whites are a much greater percentage of the impoverished in this country than all other minorities combined. I don't want to throw around statistics because I hate when people do that in discussions so I'll leave that up to whoever wants to test my claim. So in essence, the exact opposite would occur because lawmakers would "primarily" want to help those who are at the greatest disadvantage, which, as I mentioned above, would be whites if socioeconomic status became a major consideration in AA. Think about it![]()
This sounds as though you are somewhat racist against white people 🙁 I mean you admit there is also a large problem with poor whites, but from your attitude you seem to think that's fine, and that they shouldn't be helped, but minorities should. Why can't everyone that is disadvantaged (regardless of race) hope for (and hopefully get) some form of help? Your view seems illogical, I just don't understand you I guess 🙁 Oh well

Edit--You seem like the kind of person that will think it's clever to say something like "you said it-you don't understand me" because of my last sentence. Please save us all, it's not clever.

) go on to practice in underserved areas, then that is one more minority fulfilling a need that was otherwise devoid. Fair?
Is this post a little more mature for ya?