Well, I knew that the question was coming because I saw it on the interview feedback site. Rickets is really making a comeback in our society, and it is a really big problem.
Freaker, let's think this through. Let's assume that every in-state student applies to both ETSU and UTM. ETSU interviews 200 in-state students every year, and UTM interviews over 300. Fifty-five of the students who interview at ETSU enroll at ETSU, and there are about 145 in-state spots at UTM. Therefore, 145 students applied at ETSU, were interviewed, and will not attend. In theory, interviewees at ETSU were judged more competitive than non-interviewees. Assuming that ETSU and UTM use the same criteria for evaluating applicants, it stands to reason that not only are rejected ETSU interviewees more competitive at UTM, but that the number of those applicants equals the total number of spots at UTM! In other words, we have the inside track!