rejection from mass mental health center
And less than a minute later rejected from northwesternrejection from mass mental health center
You are the real MVP! Thanks str63!DCT here. We know that it's agonizing waiting to hear from sites, but please remember if we wait longer to send rejections after invites, there is a reason behind it. For example, if a site has multiple tracks, and the invites go out in waves depending on track, we don't want to send multiple emails/rejections to the same applicant because this causes confusion for the applicant. Plus, as a training director, I wouldn't want to send multiple rejections to a single applicant - I know how tough this time is. Some sites may also have waitlists and don't want to send a rejection unless they are certain that the applicant will not be invited. From those that I know on training committees, there is no site that I'm aware of that just waits to send rejections for no reason. We also want this part of the process to be over as soon as possible. If the notification date that the site had listed on APPIC has passed and you haven't heard, then definitely feel free to contact the site, but please don't contact the site before then. We're already busy enough and this will likely reflect poorly on you. Good luck to all of you!
So, just wondering if someone can confirm that Stanford/Lucile Packard actually sent out invites. I see it on the front page, but I have gone through the form and can't find the original post. Also, I have heard from several people who applied there (n = 7 😀), that they have not heard back either
So, just wondering if someone can confirm that Stanford/Lucile Packard actually sent out invites. I see it on the front page, but I have gone through the form and can't find the original post. Also, I have heard from several people who applied there (n = 7 😀), that they have not heard back either
Anyone else thinks/hopes that McLean might do their (what seems to be kind of) usual second wave of invites for Adult track later today? Not quite sure I get the logic though, except for they seem to only include December dates in their first wave and only January dates in their second wave. Mystery?
Mass rejection email from Mass Mental Health/BIDMC PREP track. I actually felt like I was a good fit for this one. Officially starting to be concerned.
Sent from my iPhone using SDN mobile
n=8So, just wondering if someone can confirm that Stanford/Lucile Packard actually sent out invites. I see it on the front page, but I have gone through the form and can't find the original post. Also, I have heard from several people who applied there (n = 7 😀), that they have not heard back either
So, just wondering if someone can confirm that Stanford/Lucile Packard actually sent out invites. I see it on the front page, but I have gone through the form and can't find the original post. Also, I have heard from several people who applied there (n = 7 😀), that they have not heard back either
I will also add, though, that there was at least one other site that I did not see posted and thought that maybe there was another thread or outside sources from which the information was taken (I think the site was MGH Neuro). It's entirely possible that it is just inattention to detail on my part, but I didn't recall seeing it unless someone posted it later than the date on which they received notification.
Aaahhh congrats! I wanted to apply there, but they dont accept school psychs. Looks like a cool program!Official Site Name: Texas Juvenile Justice Dept.
Date Invitation Received: 12/3/2018
Method of Invitation (Phone call, personal/mass email, snapchat): Mass email
Specialty Track or Site (e.g., for consortiums): Giddings State School AND MART
Offered Interview Dates: 1/23,1/24
If & How you're staying sane: N/A
Mass rejection from st Elizabeth's. I appreciate the message from DCT:
I am very aware of the high stress related to this application process, and I want to emphasize that this email is not a reflection of your qualifications. Rather, our decision to extend interview offers is based more so on overall fit with our program. I personally review every single application that we receive, and I greatly appreciate all of the effort and hard work that you dedicated to your application materials. I very much regret that I cannot reply to each you of personally, but I am very happy to share feedback with you about your application materials after the match process has been completed.
I didn't apply to Stanford/Lucile Packard myself, but know multiple people who did apply and got interviews there a few weeks ago. Not sure if they will send out a second wave, though!
I've been wondering this as well - I have heard nothing along with a few colleagues (smaller n).
Mass rejection from st Elizabeth's. I appreciate the message from DCT:
I am very aware of the high stress related to this application process, and I want to emphasize that this email is not a reflection of your qualifications. Rather, our decision to extend interview offers is based more so on overall fit with our program. I personally review every single application that we receive, and I greatly appreciate all of the effort and hard work that you dedicated to your application materials. I very much regret that I cannot reply to each you of personally, but I am very happy to share feedback with you about your application materials after the match process has been completed.
That's a great question. I did post an in-depth analysis in the thread called "Anyone Else Afraid of Not Matching" for anyone who is interested in the full story. But just for the quick version:
1. I didn't have enough intervention hours (my first external practicum was heavy in neuro assessment) so I'm quite sure that my application was thrown out by many sites up front. Although sites post a "minimum" number of required intervention hours, I think many of them use much higher cutoffs when actually reviewing applications just due to the competitiveness of all the applicants. For better or worse, in the last few years, it has become much more common to take an extra year before applying for internship so the number of training hours needed to be a viable candidate has gone up. To remedy this I spent the last year at a practicum that had a lot of intervention opportunities so it brought me up to a competitive level with training hours.
2. My materials last year (e.g. essays + cover letters) were 100% oriented towards neuropsychology. I have since been advised that this was a terrible strategy and that internship is really supposed to be centered around generalist training with some opportunities for specialty training. My materials this year, especially my essays, are way more general and holistic and while my cover letters do clearly state my career goals regarding being a neuropsychologist, I also highlight my desire for training in other aspects of the field.
Baylor!!!! Finally!
And Miami VA 🙂
So, just wondering if someone can confirm that Stanford/Lucile Packard actually sent out invites. I see it on the front page, but I have gone through the form and can't find the original post. Also, I have heard from several people who applied there (n = 7 😀), that they have not heard back either
Anyone knows whether asking for a different date is an option with them if these two dates absolutely do not work?Official Site Name: McLean Hospital/Harvard Medical School
Date Invitation Received: 12/3
Method of Invitation (Phone call, personal/mass email, snapchat): Mass email
Specialty Track or Site (e.g., for consortiums): Adult
Offered Interview Dates: 1/7, 1/11
Note that this was a second wave; the December dates weren't offered to me .
Has anyone heard from White River Junction VA?
Which Baylor?!?Baylor!!!! Finally!
And Miami VA 🙂
Is this the one also called University of Tennessee Health Science Center?Official Site Name: Tennessee Internship Consortium
Date Invitation Received: 12/3/2018
Method of Invitation (Phone call, personal/mass email, snapchat): Mass Email
Specialty Track or Site (e.g., for consortiums): N/A
Offered Interview Dates: They assigned the date of 1/7, but the other date they assign is 1/4
yay!
Has anyone heard from Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (Rehabilitation Psychology/Neuropsychology Services; ID: 1474)? This is different from the Mount Sinai Beth Israel site.
Has anyone heard from Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (Rehabilitation Psychology/Neuropsychology Services; ID: 1474)? This is different from the Mount Sinai Beth Israel site.
Congrats! Got an interview invite from them as well! -)Official Site Name: The University of Texas Health Science Center at Tyler Psychology Internship Program
Date Invitation Received: 12/3
Method of Invitation (Phone call, personal/mass email, snapchat): personal email
Specialty Track or Site (e.g., for consortiums): N/A
Offered Interview Dates: Jan 2, 9, 16, 23, 30
YASSSSSSSSS SO PUMPED!!!!
Sent from my iPhone using SDN
Still waiting to hear from Texas State also, glad to know I'm not alone...Anyone heard from Texas State University Counseling Center?
Given that the interview dates listed on their site are pretty soon and they appear to have sent out invites earlier last year, I'm thinking they have already have. Would just like to confirm.
I think this is the issue I am having in regards to some of the sites that I thought were good fits - in retrospect, I believe that I spoke far too much about Neuro and research without completely accepting the fact that this would be more useful for my anticipated post-doc positions and that our internships should be a well-balanced final year prior to degree. It seems obvious now, but I clearly wasn't thinking in that fashion while writing my cover letters and essays.
Is this the one also called University of Tennessee Health Science Center?