Are Millennial MDs Turning Their Backs on FIRE?

Started by drusso
This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
Get help with your application

Use all the free resources available to you from SDN: articles, guides, expert advising, forums discussions, and school research.

Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
I just read a post on another MD forum about creating a jewelry budget. It seems like younger MDs are turning their backs on FIRE.
I think it's just the usual short time horizon of youth.

I'm happy to see people buying things they enjoy and starting families rather than fixating 100% on exiting their career asap.

I see more hard core FIRE in tech and marketing nightmare jobs where it might be harder to find satisfaction than in healthcare.
 
I think it's just the usual short time horizon of youth.

I'm happy to see people buying things they enjoy and starting families rather than fixating 100% on exiting their career asap.

I see more hard core FIRE in tech and marketing nightmare jobs where it might be harder to find satisfaction than in healthcare.
Or it’s not nice fixating on material possessions. Good to see youth saying they need experiences and live life fully
 
Regarding FIRE, there is no reason you can't do both. At some point further contributions to investments barely move the needle and it makes sense to start enjoying life a bit more in the present.

For those who invested early, paid off any bad debts, saved for retirement, funded the 529s(if applicable), and have adequately projected their worst and most likely case scenarios, at some point "super saving" becomes pointless. Help your grown kids earlier rather than making them wait for an inheritance windfall, buy the watch, take more trips. You can't take it with you when you die -- do your kids really need a multimillion dollar inheritance?

This is a passion topic for me. Love discussing FIRE and finance, keep the thread going please.
 
Regarding FIRE, there is no reason you can't do both. At some point further contributions to investments barely move the needle and it makes sense to start enjoying life a bit more in the present.

For those who invested early, paid off any bad debts, saved for retirement, funded the 529s(if applicable), and have adequately projected their worst and most likely case scenarios, at some point "super saving" becomes pointless. Help your grown kids earlier rather than making them wait for an inheritance windfall, buy the watch, take more trips. You can't take it with you when you die -- do your kids really need a multimillion dollar inheritance?

This is a passion topic for me. Love discussing FIRE and finance, keep the thread going please.
I love this topic as well.

I think the main goal is really FIWO (Financial Independence Work Optional) instead of retiring early. Once work is optional you really get to decide where your efforts make the most sense and if you still enjoy practicing medicine and can do it all on your own terms I think that makes you a better doctor.
 
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
Regarding FIRE, there is no reason you can't do both. At some point further contributions to investments barely move the needle and it makes sense to start enjoying life a bit more in the present.

For those who invested early, paid off any bad debts, saved for retirement, funded the 529s(if applicable), and have adequately projected their worst and most likely case scenarios, at some point "super saving" becomes pointless. Help your grown kids earlier rather than making them wait for an inheritance windfall, buy the watch, take more trips. You can't take it with you when you die -- do your kids really need a multimillion dollar inheritance?

This is a passion topic for me. Love discussing FIRE and finance, keep the thread going please.
Agree that once you reach a certain point super saving makes no sense if your compounding rate is high enough.

If you don't want your kids to have a multi-million dollar inheritance there would be plenty of charities/foundations/altruistic endeavours that would benefit.
I'd prefer to not die with zero (having spent all on myself) so I can give my kids/grandkids + charitable organizations meaningful dollars.
 
Regarding FIRE, there is no reason you can't do both. At some point further contributions to investments barely move the needle and it makes sense to start enjoying life a bit more in the present.

For those who invested early, paid off any bad debts, saved for retirement, funded the 529s(if applicable), and have adequately projected their worst and most likely case scenarios, at some point "super saving" becomes pointless. Help your grown kids earlier rather than making them wait for an inheritance windfall, buy the watch, take more trips. You can't take it with you when you die -- do your kids really need a multimillion dollar inheritance?

This is a passion topic for me. Love discussing FIRE and finance, keep the thread going please.
Still got some years before my kids enter college. 529s will be fully funded, will probably need to float the rest of they do private or grad school. How do you plan to help your kids as they get older? I want to help them but also not make it too comfortable so they can develop their own financial discipline. We're thinking help with house down payment perhaps.

Income and investments have done better than projected, so we've begun to ramp up donations.
 
I love this topic as well.

I think the main goal is really FIWO (Financial Independence Work Optional) instead of retiring early. Once work is optional you really get to decide where your efforts make the most sense and if you still enjoy practicing medicine and can do it all on your own terms I think that makes you a better doctor.
I know everyone situation is different but I’m curious what people in here would think safe number would be to start doing FIWO and cut down hrs and procedures @Baron S asking for a friend

$3 mil, 5 mil, 7mil, 10?
 
At 10 is my vote

I’m doing 38k per year in my kids 529 till they are 5 and then stopping- that should cover most things
One of my kids qualifies for trump account so I’ll do 5 k/year and roll over to Roth when they’re 18


Doing nothing else for them. They can pay for their house afterwards or whatever else they need
Once I hit 10mil in retirement/brokerage accounts, I’ll continue working but for likely 3 days/week doing what I’m doing

I want to buy a RV and explore/hike with my wife all 50 states in depth when all my kids are off to college in 20 years from now
 
I know everyone situation is different but I’m curious what people in here would think safe number would be to start doing FIWO and cut down hrs and procedures @Baron S asking for a friend

$3 mil, 5 mil, 7mil, 10?
If you have 5m in investible assets, as a disciplined investor without dependents or major vices, work is absolutely optional.
 
Instead of focusing on a number it will probably be the intersection of my exhaustion level with the age of my kids being old enough to do fun travel. I’d like to scale back during their high school years and then ramp back up while they’re in college
 
Agree that once you reach a certain point super saving makes no sense if your compounding rate is high enough.

If you don't want your kids to have a multi-million dollar inheritance there would be plenty of charities/foundations/altruistic endeavours that would benefit.
I'd prefer to not die with zero (having spent all on myself) so I can give my kids/grandkids + charitable organizations meaningful dollars.
the real question is: what is that "certain point"? nobody knows and it is different for all.

does equity in your house count towards this magic number?
 
Instead of focusing on a number it will probably be the intersection of my exhaustion level with the age of my kids being old enough to do fun travel. I’d like to scale back during their high school years and then ramp back up while they’re in college
so you want to work 30 hours/week while they are in high school but back to 50/60 5-10 years later? thats hard for me to understand
 
the real question is: what is that "certain point"? nobody knows and it is different for all.

does equity in your house count towards this magic number?
equity in the house doesn't count for me since I won't be living off that number.

I do include it in my net worth calculation but am more concerned with my invested assets as that's what I will draw from in retirement.
 
equity in the house doesn't count for me since I won't be living off that number.

I do include it in my net worth calculation but am more concerned with my invested assets as that's what I will draw from in retirement.
will you be living in a 4 BR house in the burbs in retirement, tho?

i dont know the answer, but that equity will be liquidated at some point, and i cant imagine ill spend as much on the retirement house as i do with the current house. maybe half?

the real question is what will happen with the kids. i think there is a reasonable possibility that my kids will not be living on their own until their late 20s. this seems to be the unfortunate trend
 
will you be living in a 4 BR house in the burbs in retirement, tho?

i dont know the answer, but that equity will be liquidated at some point, and i cant imagine ill spend as much on the retirement house as i do with the current house. maybe half?

the real question is what will happen with the kids. i think there is a reasonable possibility that my kids will not be living on their own until their late 20s. this seems to be the unfortunate trend
You know you do have a say in whether your kids live with you until age 30. Don’t be an enabler
 
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
the real question is: what is that "certain point"? nobody knows and it is different for all.

does equity in your house count towards this magic number?
Some is not a number. Soon is not a time.
Yes - everyone's "number" is going to be different but doesn't mean they're wrong.

For me it is ~$10m by age 50-55. I'm agnostic to the time in that range but the number is non-negotiable. Once I get there I'll cut back to ~3 days/week or take 5x+ the vacation I do now or find some charitable work to have something to stay cognitively/socially engaged.

My entire portfolio has averaged 22%/year over the past 10 years. If performance remains even remotely close (or just reverts to the historical SP500 mean) then in 3-4 years I will not need to worry about "super savings" beyond tax advantaged HSA/Roth IRA/Roth 401k contributions I'd make anyway. If my performance was in the 6-8% range over the prior decade then, yes, keep super saving for longer or retire in early/mid 60s would be the option.
 
Some is not a number. Soon is not a time.
Yes - everyone's "number" is going to be different but doesn't mean they're wrong.

For me it is ~$10m by age 50-55. I'm agnostic to the time in that range but the number is non-negotiable. Once I get there I'll cut back to ~3 days/week or take 5x+ the vacation I do now or find some charitable work to have something to stay cognitively/socially engaged.

My entire portfolio has averaged 22%/year over the past 10 years. If performance remains even remotely close (or just reverts to the historical SP500 mean) then in 3-4 years I will not need to worry about "super savings" beyond tax advantaged HSA/Roth IRA/Roth 401k contributions I'd make anyway. If my performance was in the 6-8% range over the prior decade then, yes, keep super saving for longer or retire in early/mid 60s would be the option.
That’s an impressive average over the last 10 yrs. You must be very heavy in tech and stocks
 
the real question is: what is that "certain point"? nobody knows and it is different for all.

does equity in your house count towards this magic number?
That depends on if you are willing to liquidate your home and find alternative living arrangements to fund your lifestyle. For the vast majority the answer to that is "no".

A more helpful metric than Net Worth is to project your retirement expenses and work backwards from there. Subtract any guaranteed income streams (pension, SS, etc), multiple by approx 25 (possible a bit less and that's what you need in liquid assets to mathematically be totally fine in a historically awful market.

That is over simplified and will probably overestimate how much you need. Spending slows as we age. Most 80 year olds aren't taking 10 trips/yr. They might not need that second home.
 
At 10 is my vote

I’m doing 38k per year in my kids 529 till they are 5 and then stopping- that should cover most things
One of my kids qualifies for trump account so I’ll do 5 k/year and roll over to Roth when they’re 18


Doing nothing else for them. They can pay for their house afterwards or whatever else they need
Once I hit 10mil in retirement/brokerage accounts, I’ll continue working but for likely 3 days/week doing what I’m doing

I want to buy a RV and explore/hike with my wife all 50 states in depth when all my kids are off to college in 20 years from now

Touring colleges with my daughter now. $90K tuition (not including other expenses) is the new normal.
 
Touring colleges with my daughter now. $90K tuition (not including other expenses) is the new normal.
I’m not sure if they’ll want to do that much private education (depending on what they pick). One may go into finance or engineering for which it’d cost less - I can roll over to other kid depending. Not worth putting more into 529- may have to shell out more money depending on what they pick for careers

Every $190,000 contributed early in childhood can potentially become- 38x5
  • ~$400k–$450k with 6% returns
  • ~$460k–$525k with 7% returns
  • ~$550k–$650k with 8% returns
You’re right, I have no idea what’s going to happen in 20 years. I’d hope it doesn’t cost 150k/year tuition
 
Has to be talking about cost of attendance. I can’t find any tuitions over like $75k at the big name privates. The flagship state schools in every state I’ve ever lived/trained/worked are 20k or less.

There are some dental schools topping $100k tuition alone, however.
 
529 projections are tricky. 35k can be rolled into a Roth IRA if you overrund them, but beyond that it's a bit tricky. Theres a 10% penalty for non qualified expenses and the gains are taxed as regular income. A custodial account can also be good to have.
 
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
Better off just letting them roll on, and use that money for grandkids or nieces/nephews. You can use it to pay for private elementary school even.

Agreed.

I'd say most docs are best off by trying to reasonably project 529 and contribute appropriately, roll leftover into Roth for them, transfer the rest, and any additional money you want to invest on their behalf be kept in a trust brokerage account and later gifted.

UTMA is also an option but I wouldn't want to risk that.
 
I could retire today if I wanted to but I would have to live a more typical lifestyle. One trip a year, older/smaller home, get rid of a car, etc. I think lots of us can do the same in our early 40s but we don’t really know what to do with our time besides work or expensive hobbies/travel.
 
Are you only looking at private schools or something? My Alma mater (very good state school) is currently just under $14k a year for tuition.

Took this picture from our pre-admission presentation yesterday at a well known NYC college:
 

Attachments

  • IMG_3211.jpeg
    IMG_3211.jpeg
    426.5 KB · Views: 139