Ask me (almost) anything

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Assuming you work in the northeast..

How many applicants do you see from the southwest US? Do a lot of them stand a fair chance against applicants from northeast/ivys?

Regardless of where a school is located, most private (not state) schools are looking for geographic diversity.
 
Hi. Thanks so much for taking your time to answer questions.

I am curious to what extent clinical experience matter for the application process. For the most part most clinical experiences at a local hospital would consist of sitting around without too much patient contact.

I did do ~150 hours of clinical work + some shadowing but I did not have a chance to participate with some of the more "hands on" clinical experiences in free clinics or special programs because I did not have the means to attend.
Instead I really focused my efforts in biomedical research. (very passionate since high school)

To what extent will I have to qualify my relative low clinical hours? Would saying that I made use of my time in a way that I felt would make the most impact (i.e. research) because there will be extensive clinical exposure once I am in med school come off sounding too ignorant of the clinical side?
 
I didn't directly ask the question that prompted this response, but I did have a quick follow up.

My 3.4 is almost entirely due to a bunch of B+ grades. The lowest grade I have received is a B- (in physics 1) and I only have one of those so far.

Everything else has been in the B+ range, with some A-'s and Bs that evened out to a 3.4.

Is that different than having C+'s and A's balance out to a 3.4?

yes, it's better (best) not to have any C's.
 
Hi LizzyM,

I was just wondering how important grade trends are. I know that upward trends are looked upon favorably, but what about slight downward trends? If someone started with a 4.0 his or her freshman year but have gotten a few A-'s/B+'s down the road (but never lower than a 3.7 in a semester), does that look bad or not a good as someone who has increased his or her GPA?

Thank you for taking the time to do this! SDN is obviously really appreciating it!

If your semester gpa is never less than 3.7, you're fine.... maybe more than fine.
 
How do adcoms view an applicant who has been diagnosed with an illness, which led them to pursue medicine? Does having the experience of personally dealing with being in the hospital help, hurt, or is it neutral?
 
If something gets flagged on a background check, do students generally have a chance to explain themselves? From what I've heard, some folks have been unaware that a traffic violation they had was actually a misdemeanor.

I have no idea. That's handled by the Dean's office, not the adcom.
Similarly, what about IAs? Do undergraduate institutions send a report regarding these to the med schools, or is it included with the official transcript, or what?

Some schools make a mention that an applicant has no IAs in the committee letter; as for anything else, again it is in the Dean's hands.
For some interview questions, it seems like there's no real "right" answer, like the 'what is the biggest problem with healthcare today?' questions. Are interviewers typically looking for a particular viewpoint, or that the applicant has some idea of the issue and can form a reasonable explanation for their thoughts?

Thanks!
That you have a well formed and well informed opinion and are capable of expressing it.
 
Hi Lizzy, I know you touched on the prior misdemeanor issue on the previous page, but I wanted to get your thoughts on a DWI. I got one seven years ago, and by the time im applying for med schoo, it will have been over a decade prior. I have searched this, but I never saw any responses from adcom members. That DWI greatly changed my life. Therefore, if I were to include this in my p/s and explained why and how it impacted my life and changed me into a better person, could I still be considered?

P.s.,immense thanks for doing this thread. 🙂

I don't know for sure because it is exceptionally rare to see an applicant who had a DWI 10 years prior to applying....

If I were asked to weigh in, I would vote to permit the application to go forward for review and possible interview.
 
Is it unfavorable to have not done much the freshman year of college?

It is not a deal breaker but it is nice to apply at the end of junior year with at least one thing that you've been engaged in for 3 yrs or more even if it is just a hobby or intramural sports, performing arts, etc.
 
Although previous posts have thanked you multiple times for doing this thread, I feel that it could use another thank you. So..THANK YOU SO MUCH. You have been extremely insightful!

I know that you mentioned that one basically has no chance for admission into top-tier schools if there are a few Cs on his/her transcript (in my case, I have a couple of unfortunate C+s). Do schools (mainly schools such as yours) take into consideration extenuating circumstances that one might have encountered during those semesters in which bad grades were present? I know there is room to explain all of this in one's application but is an applicant automatically put in the reject pile or do adcoms take a holistic look at their application before rejecting an applicant?

Thank you!

Well, I don't believe I said that one has no chance of admission if there are a few Cs on a transcript... that said, yes, a holistic approach is made. If there were extenuating circumstances, please explain. That can be taken into account.

Just as "What to Expect When You're Expecting" talks about the "best odds" for having a healthy baby, there are "best odds" for getting into medical school. That doesn't mean that someone who has the application equivalent of a chain-smoking, fried food eating mommy doesn't stand a chance at being admitted somewhere.... and in some cases, somewhere very good.
 
Aww yea!! Finally the great LizzyM comes forth. My question is this:

When Thousands of applicants apply, how do you narrow down the people you give interview invites to. I know this varies from school to school, but just gimme a quick taste. Subsequently, how do you review those that receive an acceptance offer. Does the admissions committee sit down and look at each individual applicant again or turn to each other and say things like, "He sucks! Let's not take him."

Please LizzyM, give me great insight on this topic based on your experiences.

Someone reads the whole file. Many (depending on cut points -- that I don't really know) are reviewed a second and third time by other reviewers. Each reader makes written notes and recommendation to review or not. The Dean uses that information to decide who gets an interview invite.

A large group of people review each application post-interview, write comments and later get together to discuss the applications and make recommendations; here disagreements are hashed out. There is a final step where another group review each application and all the commentaries and recommendations make a decision.
 
Hi. Thanks so much for taking your time to answer questions.

I am curious to what extent clinical experience matter for the application process. For the most part most clinical experiences at a local hospital would consist of sitting around without too much patient contact.

I did do ~150 hours of clinical work + some shadowing but I did not have a chance to participate with some of the more "hands on" clinical experiences in free clinics or special programs because I did not have the means to attend.
Instead I really focused my efforts in biomedical research. (very passionate since high school)

To what extent will I have to qualify my relative low clinical hours? Would saying that I made use of my time in a way that I felt would make the most impact (i.e. research) because there will be extensive clinical exposure once I am in med school come off sounding too ignorant of the clinical side?

What made you want to be a doctor? How did you test this interest? What do you think is the most challenging thing you'll face as a physician? Tell me about a memorable situation you recall from your clinical experience. Through shadowing, employment or volunteerism, you should have enough experience to answer those questions. If you don't have enough experience, you need to get some, even if it means taking an extra year to work full time in a clinical setting.
 
How do adcoms view an applicant who has been diagnosed with an illness, which led them to pursue medicine? Does having the experience of personally dealing with being in the hospital help, hurt, or is it neutral?

It is very common. Keep in mind that you are not applying for admission to the hospital. You should have some experience as a provider of care or services, rather than only a recipient.
 
1. How stringent are the course requirements? If an applicant completes pre-reqs or an undergraduate degree in a foreign school (eg. Oxford or Cambridge) can these typically be substituted?

2. Would being 30 years old, be old enough to cause an adcom to question an applicants "energy and flexibility?"

3. How much does diversity select against students who are otherwise qualified? Interviewing at some schools, we've been told that our diversity within a class (ie. how much we add to class diversity) is important. In a way it feels as if we're competing for spots only against other people of our race, sexuality, religion that fulfill that particular class niche.

4. Is there a growing trend to waitlist more candidates to prevent overaccepting or to ensure that applicants really are particularly interested through a later letter of interest?
 
Last edited:
Thank you for this wonderful opportunity. I have a few questions if you don't mind.

1) How much volunteering, shadowing, and research do top students tend to have, or are encouraged to have? (range wise, objectively speaking)

2) How much influence does an Ivy League undergrad school have in consideration of the overall application? For example, all other things equal, a 3.7 GPA at an Ivy versus a 4.0 at a non-Ivy

3) How much weight is given to publishing research versus just participating it it? Do admissions committee's care a great deal?

4) How much consideration is given to the rigors of one's undergrad courses when applying to top schools? For example, taking classes like neurobiology, anatomy & physiology and having a competitive GPA versus a higher GPA with traditional pre-med course load

and finally,
5) How do schools typically approach non-traditional applications; is the process any different and do they give it any unique consideration?

Thank you so much!
 
I don't know for sure because it is exceptionally rare to see an applicant who had a DWI 10 years prior to applying....

If I were asked to weigh in, I would vote to permit the application to go forward for review and possible interview.

Noted, thank you. If it were to eventually be sealed or expunged, would I still put it in my application? I have no other criminal record, but that mistake I made is plaguing me when it comes to this. I really want to put my heart and soul into achieving med school admittance, but it would break my heart if this was the weighing factor in a rejection.
 
Hi Lizzy, thank you for doing this!

When admissions committees say they only look at an applicant's most recent MCAT scores, to what extent is this true? Adcoms are, after all, human, and surely there will be at least one member who keeps the first set of scores in the back of his or her head. Also, if the difference in scores is significant (e.g., 10-12 points), how do adcoms perceive such an improvement?

I think you may have my missed my question from earlier. Thank you again!
 
Thanks in advance, LizzyM.

Is there any downside to sending an "update letter" post-interview, without any actual updates (new activities, grades, etc.)? I would simply want to expand on how I would be an excellent fit to that school, beyond what I expressed in my interviews.
 
I just finished my first semester of college and over break, I've been volunteering at a clinic. 90% of the time, all they make me do is file insurance papers and lead patients to their doctors. They said they wont let volunteers help out more than that until I've been there a couple of months.

Can I even put that I've been volunteering at a clinic on my resume for this filing/leading work or should I only put the time I get to be with patients later on.

Thanks. 🙂
 
What is the lowest MCAT (subsections too please?) and GPA (I think you told me a 3.03 a while back?) that you have recommended for interview. Did they end up getting in (again I think you told me two with low GPAs in the past, but any with MCATs?).

Oh, and thanks for doing this. I know me and a bunch of other people always pester the heck out of you, and now its all in one place.
 
How is being married young and having a family viewed? (23 and married w/2 kids, working full time thru school to support family). Also, is a research project that takes a semester to complete for a class (ie developmental biology) counted towards research or is it purely on-your-own-time research that counts? Thanks!
 
Noted, thank you. If it were to eventually be sealed or expunged, would I still put it in my application? I have no other criminal record, but that mistake I made is plaguing me when it comes to this. I really want to put my heart and soul into achieving med school admittance, but it would break my heart if this was the weighing factor in a rejection.

That's a question to ask a lawyer.
 
How is being married young and having a family viewed? (23 and married w/2 kids, working full time thru school to support family).

How will you balance your responsibilites to school and family? Do you have a support network in the area? Those are the questions that will need satisfactory answers... usually during the interview.
Also, is a research project that takes a semester to complete for a class (ie developmental biology) counted towards research or is it purely on-your-own-time research that counts? Thanks!

If it is really research (new knowledge, hypothesis driven), then yes, it counts even if you receive academic credit for it.
 
What is the lowest MCAT (subsections too please?) and GPA (I think you told me a 3.03 a while back?) that you have recommended for interview. Did they end up getting in (again I think you told me two with low GPAs in the past, but any with MCATs?).

Oh, and thanks for doing this. I know me and a bunch of other people always pester the heck out of you, and now its all in one place.

I've been personally responsible for over 5,000 applications over the past 10 years so it is hard for me to remember specific records... Far better to get a copy of the 2010-2011 MSAR (last year's with the blue cover -- not this year's with the green cover) and look specifically at the bottom 10% of students at each school you are considering.
 
First of, thank you for your time!

My personal life accounted much for my lack of excellence throughout my freshman and 1st semester of my sophomore year. Hopefully, I will raise my GPA next semester and the following years. My question is this: Will my deficient academic performance affect me during my application period? My goal is to attend a school that will provide with me the best primary care education. What do you recommend I should do to even stand a chance?
 
This was touched upon briefly earlier. But if a person is interested in academia (teaching and/or research), how much would the reputation/perceived prestige of the medical school matter? Do you think there are any differences in quality between schools in say, the "top 3," "top 10" and "top 20?"

Also, when it comes to choosing a school, people here often say that location and cost of attendance should be the two biggest factors. Do you agree? And do these factors also hold true for people interested in academics?

Thanks LizzyM, your posts have helped me a lot throughout the past year! 🙂

This is hard to say ... you need to consider what the school offers (academics, extracurriculars, net cost after merit & need based grants, location as it relates to your support network) and whether it is a good fit for you. Tranferring is almost unheard of so a bad fit can't be fixed after a semester or a year as many do in college.
 
First of, thank you for your time!

My personal life accounted much for my lack of excellence throughout my freshman and 1st semester of my sophomore year. Hopefully, I will raise my GPA next semester and the following years. My question is this: Will my deficient academic performance affect me during my application period?

Yes.
My goal is to attend a school that will provide with me the best primary care education. What do you recommend I should do to even stand a chance?

Improve your academic performance. Prepare for the MCAT including practice tests. Do not take the MCAT until you are very well prepared. Do not apply as a rising senior unless your application is the best it can be.

Take the MCAT once, apply just once.
 
Hi Lizzy, thank you for doing this!

When admissions committees say they only look at an applicant's most recent MCAT scores, to what extent is this true? Adcoms are, after all, human, and surely there will be at least one member who keeps the first set of scores in the back of his or her head. Also, if the difference in scores is significant (e.g., 10-12 points), how do adcoms perceive such an improvement?


My committee is encouraged to average the scores as evidence has shown that this is the most accurate way to deal with multiple scores.
 
Thanks for everything you do on this forum. Your advice is second to none really.

How strongly does good SMP performance (3.7 or greater) influence your choices in applicants? Does strong gpa in SMPs really make up for low undergrad gpas (3.1 to 3.3)?
 
If your semester gpa is never less than 3.7, you're fine.... maybe more than fine.

Well, I don't believe I said that one has no chance of admission if there are a few Cs on a transcript... that said, yes, a holistic approach is made. If there were extenuating circumstances, please explain. That can be taken into account.

Just as "What to Expect When You're Expecting" talks about the "best odds" for having a healthy baby, there are "best odds" for getting into medical school. That doesn't mean that someone who has the application equivalent of a chain-smoking, fried food eating mommy doesn't stand a chance at being admitted somewhere.... and in some cases, somewhere very good.

I hoped to perhaps be more explicit on this. If an applicant perhaps had a 3.4 average their first three semesters (because of poor adjustment to college) and then maintained 3.9+ for every semester afterwards (5 semesters), how will this be handled? I know it will affect them, but is this going to be a major handicap compared to someone else with the same cumulative average?

Is social science research looked down upon or considered less favorably than research in the natural/physical sciences? What if the social science research is medically related (Diabetes)?

Thanks 😀
 
My friend is choosing between devoting time to neurobio research at his Ivy's med school or cog sci research. He is far more interested in the latter; his school's cognitive science program is tip-top; and the cog science lab he's interested in is far more productive publication-wise than the neurobio lab (and MUCH more receptive to independent undergraduate research). However, he feels that med schools look more favorably on medically-relevant research.

I have been telling him to choose the cognitive science lab, but as a premed myself, I don't want to give bad advice. Any thoughts? Is there any preference? What about for MD/PhDs?
 
Hi Lizzy, Thank you for taking the time to answer our questions.

You say that poor academic performance during your freshman year can affect you during the application cycle. I have three years before I intend to apply. I just recently went back to school and I am more mature and focused on raising my GPA and preparing for the MCAT. What can I do to stand out as a serious applicant for medical school? I've learned from my mistakes and I am now very serious about my academic work.
 
1. How stringent are the course requirements? If an applicant completes pre-reqs or an undergraduate degree in a foreign school (eg. Oxford or Cambridge) can these typically be substituted?

If you are in that boat, make inquiries directly to the schools you are considering.
2. Would being 30 years old, be old enough to cause an adcom to question an applicants "energy and flexibility?"?

No, that tends to happen at 37 or older.
3. How much does diversity select against students who are otherwise qualified? Interviewing at some schools, we've been told that our diversity within a class (ie. how much we add to class diversity) is important. In a way it feels as if we're competing for spots only against other people of our race, sexuality, religion that fulfill that particular class niche.?

You may know that I love metaphors. Diversity is like helping yourself from a big salad bowl. You know that if you scoop up a big spoonful, you are likely to get a little of everything just by luck. If there aren't many cherry tomatoes in the bowl and you want to be sure to get a few, you might make a point of scooping a few of those in addition to whatever you got in your first spoonful.
It's not like we say, "we need six musicians, thirteen impoverished first generation Americans, etc."
4. Is there a growing trend to waitlist more candidates to prevent overaccepting or to ensure that applicants really are particularly interested through a later letter of interest?

Overaccepting is a recurrent nightmare for the Dean. There are many different strategies for coming up with the best possible class. It wouldn't surprise me if some schools improve their yield by making applicants beg for admission.
 
Thanks for everything you do on this forum. Your advice is second to none really.

How strongly does good SMP performance (3.7 or greater) influence your choices in applicants? Does strong gpa in SMPs really make up for low undergrad gpas (3.1 to 3.3)?

This question is best addressed to the school(s) you are considering for a SMP. I can count on one hand the number of applicants with SMPs I've seen in the past 5 years; those applicants just don't apply to our school.
 
Hi Lizzy, Thank you for taking the time to answer our questions.

You say that poor academic performance during your freshman year can affect you during the application cycle. I have three years before I intend to apply. I just recently went back to school and I am more mature and focused on raising my GPA and preparing for the MCAT. What can I do to stand out as a serious applicant for medical school? I've learned from my mistakes and I am now very serious about my academic work.

Do well in your classes and on the MCAT. Be involved in campus and/or community activities, too.
 
My friend is choosing between devoting time to neurobio research at his Ivy's med school or cog sci research. He is far more interested in the latter; his school's cognitive science program is tip-top; and the cog science lab he's interested in is far more productive publication-wise than the neurobio lab (and MUCH more receptive to independent undergraduate research). However, he feels that med schools look more favorably on medically-relevant research.

I have been telling him to choose the cognitive science lab, but as a premed myself, I don't want to give bad advice. Any thoughts? Is there any preference? What about for MD/PhDs?

My advice is "follow your bliss". It doesn't matter to adcoms what your research is in.

For MD/PhD programs, it is a different story. The school is going to be concerned that you have some skills that could be of value in one or more of their labs and your interests are either tightly aligned with those of one or more PIs at the school OR you are so curious and flexible that you are very interested in many things and are ready to try many labs to find a good fit.
 
Huge thanks for being a part of SDN and your anonymous mentoring. Here's my question for you: What was your motivation (and continued motivation) to be so involved in these forums?
 
I hoped to perhaps be more explicit on this. If an applicant perhaps had a 3.4 average their first three semesters (because of poor adjustment to college) and then maintained 3.9+ for every semester afterwards (5 semesters), how will this be handled? I know it will affect them, but is this going to be a major handicap compared to someone else with the same cumulative average?

An upward trend will be noted. If I were looking at the applicaition, I'd specifically look at the entire transcript to see what the grades are in the pre-reqs and where the poorest performance was (which courses). I'd also look at the course load for those years, and I'd read the LORs to see if any issues are addressed there.

Is social science research looked down upon or considered less favorably than research in the natural/physical sciences? What if the social science research is medically related (Diabetes)?

Thanks 😀

This depends on the reader. That's part of what can make this a crapshoot. On the other hand, if it is something you love, go for it. Enjoying your work and being enthusiastic about it when you interview is very important.
 
Huge thanks for being a part of SDN and your anonymous mentoring. Here's my question for you: What was your motivation (and continued motivation) to be so involved in these forums?

I found SDN when I wanted some ideas for questions to ask when conducting interviews. I discovered the forums and felt dismayed by some of the misinformation and angst I saw. I started responding to questions, got to know some of the posters (that first group are in residency now!) and got hooked.

It corresponded to my kids reaching their early teens and not needing my advice themselves 😉 and so I sublimated my desire to give advice by being involved here on the boards. 😀

Over the years, I think it has helped me understand what applicants go through and what it is like to be on the other side and that has made me a better advisor to my grad students who want to go on to med school.
 
Last edited:
Another HUGE thanks for doing this LizzyM.

Regarding post-interview decisions: are applicants reviewed post-interview in the order in which they were interviewed, or does it sometimes happen that one applicant who interviewed earlier than another doesn't hear back until later?

For example, say student A was interviewed and then accepted after 4 weeks, while student B has been waiting 6 weeks and still hasn't heard anything. Do you have any insight on why this might occur? Is it more likely that student B has weaker credentials, or that the interviewer for student B turned in his/her evaluation late, or both, etc.?
 
Another HUGE thanks for doing this LizzyM.

Regarding post-interview decisions: are applicants reviewed post-interview in the order in which they were interviewed, or does it sometimes happen that one applicant who interviewed earlier than another doesn't hear back until later?

For example, say student A was interviewed and then accepted after 4 weeks, while student B has been waiting 6 weeks and still hasn't heard anything. Do you have any insight on why this might occur? Is it more likely that student B has weaker credentials, or that the interviewer for student B turned in his/her evaluation late, or both, etc.?

Those darn interviewers. Some of them don't write and submit their reports immediately. I've seen it happen many times. Most interviewers are volunteers and although you can beg and admonish them to do things promptly, some are busy with patient care, etc, such that they don't get to their reports as soon as we might hope.
 
Thanks LizzyM for starting this thread!

You answered a question about letters of interest and update letters. My question is will a "letter of intent" carrry any more weight than a letter of interest? My thought is not really since it is not binding, but I wondered what adcoms think when they receive one.
 
Hi LizzyM,

As many other posters here have already said, thank you again for answering our questions.

I just have one question for now.

I'm in a social fraternity and have held three roles so far. I serve as the head of scholarship for my chapter, a liaison between a very large student group on campus and greek life, and the representative in our university's IFC.

Unfortunately there has always been (and probably will always be) the "animal house" stereotype for "frat guys" and I am a little afraid this might hurt me in the application cycle if I list any of these on my application.

I would hope that being in a social fraternity would not be an instant red flag on an application, but do you know if adcoms look unfavorably on involvement in Greek life?

Thank you
 
Thanks LizzyM for starting this thread!

You answered a question about letters of interest and update letters. My question is will a "letter of intent" carrry any more weight than a letter of interest? My thought is not really since it is not binding, but I wondered what adcoms think when they receive one.
Those are up to the Dean, not the adcom but for the most part, I thnk that the Dean thinks that "letters of intent" are non-binding bull****.

Showing interest is good though, particularly in the unlikely event that an opening comes along in July/Aug.
 
Do you think there is a substantial difference between a 3.7 and a 4.0? I had a 4.0 for a while but then transferred (to a plus/minus school) and haven't gotten anything but A-'s (not to complain at all, I'm still pretty thankful).

Thanks!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top