- Joined
- Oct 10, 2011
- Messages
- 8,657
- Reaction score
- 10,787
My comments to the above:
1) I'll let @TheWallnerus to the math for me as to what that means in terms of average # of patient's on beam
2) 6 attendings with more admin/research days than clinic days.... but still with 1:1 coverage by residents? What do the residents do with all those extra days not in clinic?
3) So it appears Jefferson normally has around 3 a year on average, but they took in a Cornell transplant for this incoming PGY-2 class, hence the temporary bump to 4. Jefferson having ~12 residents as a total complement makes more sense than them having ~16. It's still excessive.
4) If you're on your 4th PD since 2017 and malignancy is an ongoing issue, the problem is most likely NOT with your PDs, but likely with your chair, IMO.
Let's say the 6 attendings are 50% FTE in clinic, and the other 5 attendings are 100% FTE. That's 8 FTEs of attendings. For ~12 residents. I stick by my statements, man. Low, low hanging fruit.
1) I'll let @TheWallnerus to the math for me as to what that means in terms of average # of patient's on beam
2) 6 attendings with more admin/research days than clinic days.... but still with 1:1 coverage by residents? What do the residents do with all those extra days not in clinic?
3) So it appears Jefferson normally has around 3 a year on average, but they took in a Cornell transplant for this incoming PGY-2 class, hence the temporary bump to 4. Jefferson having ~12 residents as a total complement makes more sense than them having ~16. It's still excessive.
4) If you're on your 4th PD since 2017 and malignancy is an ongoing issue, the problem is most likely NOT with your PDs, but likely with your chair, IMO.
Let's say the 6 attendings are 50% FTE in clinic, and the other 5 attendings are 100% FTE. That's 8 FTEs of attendings. For ~12 residents. I stick by my statements, man. Low, low hanging fruit.