AVOID MILITARY MEDICINE if possible

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
Status
Not open for further replies.
I love watching you all get spun up over a few - accurate comments and some typos.

I would like to alert everyone NOT to join the FBI, DEA, Border Control, the CIA, INS, the FDA, USPHS, IHS or any other government entity - they are all screwed up, and you'll be sending the govenment a message for the good of us all by not joining. Ludicrous, but exactly the arguement each of you are making.

Anyone who served out the committment is to be commended. It isn't necessary to make the military a career to be a patriot, but spending your time and energy to undermine the military healthcare system, and indirectly the care provided to military servicemembers is cowardly.

Corpse - you are fine Harvard product - I have left a few gramaticall errers for you to correct. Please check this pompus assssss website a few laughs.

Medicalcorpse - ever feel like they are out to get you,,, all those military doctors, nurses, those Protestant Christians, and those darn CRNA's. Keep watching your back..
 
The title of this forum is "Avoid Military Medicine" obviously not one intended to be even handed.

As I have seen few if anyone on this string, presenting any of the upsides, I figured a little bit of a frontal assault was necessary, a couple of glass of wine helped as well. It definitely had the effect of stirring up some emotion and drama. I'll be the first to admit it was neither eloquent or particularly polite. I must say that I particularly enjoyed the responses comparing me to an SS officer, and a Neanderthal.

While I absolutely had no intention of impuning the character of anyone who has chosen to leave military medicine (many dear friends of mine have done so and I have supported them), I did intend to drive home the concept that although it is correct to point out problems with the system the goal should not be to destroy the system. That being said, potential applicants need to have information, both about positives and negatives. Perhaps I am idealistic but I do see positive things, and see change on the horizon (at least I hope).

For any medical student reading this please recognize that the military will most likely look completely different in the 5-10 years it will take you to graduate medical school and residency. I'll do my part to make it a better place for you in some way. Everything is cyclical in the government - they trashed the system ala 1970's (post Vietnam), started to build it again 1980's, got it working ok in early 90's only to trash it again late 1990's-present, hopefully we will start rebuilding again. As I don't think that servicemembers today or the public will tolerate any further deterioration in care - there will have to be forces to improve quality and retention - or - to get out of the healthcare business - either way - you probably do ok. Of course with the US government, there always is good reason to expect to be let down.

As far as rose colored glasses...No one should doubt that I have a tremendous list of gripes with the military healthcare system and the military in general and our civilian leadership. I have made these known at high levels (hopefully won't get any Polonium 120 in my coffee for my efforts 🙂 ). I'm happy to make a detailed list if anyone cares and I have the time. Contrary to what my detractors would like to believe, I have no aspirations of becoming a General, Commander of anything or a O-6 for that matter. I can't imagine staying past 20 years even if that means retiring at a lower rank and thus retirement pay scale. That being said, I like many are struggling to keep a stressed and in many ways failing system afloat. It however takes a influx of bright, energetic people who are willing to do their time, even if it comes with major downsides.

In most respects, I think I have more in common with most posters that not -exceptions being Corpse, or USAFdoc. The difference perhaps is intent, my goal is to make an essential system better for all rather than to write 750 posts trashing it.

Lastly, once while bitching about the system as 100% of docs do close to 100% of the time, a line officer friend reoriented me a bit.. to paraphrase... There is no use complaining about big Army, no one can change the entire system, however if each person fixes his small piece, systemic changes occur.

I'm trying to fix my little piece of the Army.

Later
 
It however takes a influx of bright, energetic people who are willing to do their time, even if it comes with major downsides.

If I can somehow convince one person to not join the military, I will consider it a great success. Not until mil med completely collapses and dies will anyone above us consider making any changes.

A1, you are either delusional or are simply a mouthpiece for the man. Whichever way it is, you are actually serving a useful purpose. Young professionals who consider joining the military will read your posts and see what kind of world they might enter. Hopefully they will not make the same mistake so many of us have.
 
I love watching you all get spun up over a few - accurate comments and some typos.

I would like to alert everyone NOT to join the FBI, DEA, Border Control, the CIA, INS, the FDA, USPHS, IHS or any other government entity - they are all screwed up, and you'll be sending the govenment a message for the good of us all by not joining. Ludicrous, but exactly the arguement each of you are making.

Anyone who served out the committment is to be commended. It isn't necessary to make the military a career to be a patriot, but spending your time and energy to undermine the military healthcare system, and indirectly the care provided to military servicemembers is cowardly.

QUOTE]
1) Glad it makes you happy if you think you are "spinning" people up; but sorry to burst your bubble, but nothing you say surprises me. Now the 31 yo pt I saw s/p stroke that had a BP of 248/148 and had military clinics refilling his meds for 2-3 years w/o even seeing the pt, now that "spins" me up.
2) If you think letting people know about exactly what is going on within military medicine (the lack of staff, lack of charts, techs shredding charts, micromanaging, poor patient care, false advertising etc) is LUDICROUS, well then you go right on ahead and think that. I believe it is letting people know what may likely be their experience if they choose to walk the same path I did....ie...informed consent. That is NOT ludicrous.
3) My goal, as stated numerous times elsewhere, is not to destroy military medicine (as if I even could), it is to let the truth be known and place some pressure on Admin to do the right thing. I tried the "military diplomatic channels/chain of command ad nauseum and it was probably a waste of time. I believe that the only way things will change is if Admin is forced to change. As long as their is a naive pipeline of HPSP students, Admin has no motivation to change. My goal is the truth.
4) Coward ???????? I would say that those willing to look the other way when they know what is going on is much more a description of cowardice (but I would not call them a coward either). I put my ass on the line by pointing out the severe deficiencies/patient care problems during my career, and was threatened to "keep quiet" as one might have guessed. I have spoken to other colonels etc that were also threatened by the USAF Surgeon General for bringing up concerns. The easy way is to keep quiet and go with the flow. That is NOT the OFFICER way. Unfortunatley, it appears to be your way.
 
Look... none of us disagree that military medicine is in deep ****... where we disagree is on how to fix it (or if it can be fixed).

I'm not sure it can be fixed. It's been going downhill for quite a while, and those of us who threw the bullsh*t flag (both when on active duty and subsequent to leaving) have seen our concerns ignored. It's continued to spiral, and docs are leaving the sinking ship in droves.

Retention is so miserable (single-digits) that it is only the constant influx of young, idealistic, and naive students into the HPSP program that has kept military medicine afloat. Think about that... it's so bad that almost nobody will do it except for the naive young studs (who have NO IDEA what they'll end up doing, or what the military medicine environment is like). That tells you something... and it's nothing good.

It's my opinion that the dramatic drop-off in HPSP scholarships being claimed this year is the ONLY thing that has gotten the leadership's attention. It's asinine and absolutely infuriating that they're only willing to look at changes when faced with the wholesale collapse of the system. Those of us who are spreading the word on forums like this one are accelerating that process, but our leadership doesn't seem to be paying attention to anything else.

There'll be a bunch of people willing to discuss and debate the cause of the "doctor shortage," but all they have to do it talk to an economist... any economist. The economist will tell them that there's no such thing as a labor shortage, only an unwillingness to make jobs sufficiently attractive (with pay, benefits, working conditions, etc) to bring in the candidates you want. I hope they listen.

It's the military way (and, I'm sorry to say, the government way in general) to ignore problems and sweep them under the rug until crisis time comes. You may consider that a jaundiced and cynical view, but I saw little in the military to disabuse me of that notion.
 
I'm not sure it can be fixed. It's been going downhill for quite a while, and those of us who threw the bullsh*t flag (both when on active duty and subsequent to leaving) have seen our concerns ignored. It's continued to spiral, and docs are leaving the sinking ship in droves.

Do you think its possible that your concerns were heard but that those in charge were unable to do anything about the problem? Even the SG has to answer to the to Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs.

I think the truth is that the reasons why we are struggling is complex and includes a number of factors:
1. Scarcity of resources
2. Leadership
3. Strain on health system from retirees
4. Increased demand from combat operations
 
If I can somehow convince one person to not join the military, I will consider it a great success. Not until mil med completely collapses and dies will anyone above us consider making any changes.

A1, you are either delusional or are simply a mouthpiece for the man.

Thanks for confirming my suspicions - if no one joins that is a great success?

Oh and you believe that a system that totally collapses can somehow be reconsituted. The only one who is delusional is the ***** who thinks that by destroying a system completely you somehow make it better. "The MAN" that's me, working for "the man", what a *****.
 
Look... none of us disagree that military medicine is in deep ****... where we disagree is on how to fix it (or if it can be fixed).

I'm not sure it can be fixed. It's been going downhill for quite a while, and those of us who threw the bullsh*t flag (both when on active duty and subsequent to leaving) have seen our concerns ignored. It's continued to spiral, and docs are leaving the sinking ship in droves.

Retention is so miserable (single-digits) that it is only the constant influx of young, idealistic, and naive students into the HPSP program that has kept military medicine afloat. Think about that... it's so bad that almost nobody will do it except for the naive young studs (who have NO IDEA what they'll end up doing, or what the military medicine environment is like). That tells you something... and it's nothing good.

It's my opinion that the dramatic drop-off in HPSP scholarships being claimed this year is the ONLY thing that has gotten the leadership's attention. It's asinine and absolutely infuriating that they're only willing to look at changes when faced with the wholesale collapse of the system. Those of us who are spreading the word on forums like this one are accelerating that process, but our leadership doesn't seem to be paying attention to anything else.

There'll be a bunch of people willing to discuss and debate the cause of the "doctor shortage," but all they have to do it talk to an economist... any economist. The economist will tell them that there's no such thing as a labor shortage, only an unwillingness to make jobs sufficiently attractive (with pay, benefits, working conditions, etc) to bring in the candidates you want. I hope they listen.

It's the military way (and, I'm sorry to say, the government way in general) to ignore problems and sweep them under the rug until crisis time comes. You may consider that a jaundiced and cynical view, but I saw little in the military to disabuse me of that notion.

Wow, a post I totally agree with....

You are right on target about several issues

- HPSP scholarship decline and retention have gotten the attention of the SG's. This is prompting them to do the usual, send out some surveys, send representatives to visit MTF's, but as of yet they have not floated the solutions necessary to turn things around.

I totally agree with your comment regarding the economist view. There were three draws that overcame the financial, and administrative disincentives to being a military doc. In short they were the following.
1. Pride in service
2. Quality of life -
3. Educational opportunties - both residency training, or training residents, and ability to do research or travel to conferences.

Well - the only one left is pride in service and that isn't enough.

- Quality of life is decidely worse -
- Educational opportunities - nearly gone - we can't count on funded travel to meetings anymore - not even annually - and the deteriorating quality of life leaves no time to dedicate to research or teaching.

I in a perverse way like seeing TSG's twist a bit - but the problems are really their creation.

It is a Congress which gave TFL with essentially no co-pays to a massive population of retiree's at the expense of military medicine - as the DOD can't control the costs of the civilian network, the only place they can cut money without pissing off voters is from the MHS. We are most definitely in deep sh#t. Like everything tho there is a pendulum here, if things don't improve the system will most definitely implode. Lets not forget that our current administration has surrounded themselves with insurance executives who have every reason to want to see military medicine die so that money is redirected to their pockets.-
 
Wow, a post I totally agree with....

You are right on target about several issues

- HPSP scholarship decline and retention have gotten the attention of the SG's. This is prompting them to do the usual, send out some surveys, send representatives to visit MTF's, but as of yet they have not floated the solutions necessary to turn things around.

I totally agree with your comment regarding the economist view. There were three draws that overcame the financial, and administrative disincentives to being a military doc. In short they were the following.
1. Pride in service
2. Quality of life -
3. Educational opportunties - both residency training, or training residents, and ability to do research or travel to conferences.

Well - the only one left is pride in service and that isn't enough.

- Quality of life is decidely worse -
- Educational opportunities - nearly gone - we can't count on funded travel to meetings anymore - not even annually - and the deteriorating quality of life leaves no time to dedicate to research or teaching.

I in a perverse way like seeing TSG's twist a bit - but the problems are really their creation.

It is a Congress which gave TFL with essentially no co-pays to a massive population of retiree's at the expense of military medicine - as the DOD can't control the costs of the civilian network, the only place they can cut money without pissing off voters is from the MHS. We are most definitely in deep sh#t. Like everything tho there is a pendulum here, if things don't improve the system will most definitely implode. Lets not forget that our current administration has surrounded themselves with insurance executives who have every reason to want to see military medicine die so that money is redirected to their pockets.-

yo A1; do you have a split personality or something? I agree with this last entry of yours, yet you seem off your rocker on some previous entries.

the vast majority of "us previous military docs" do not want to see military medicine destroyed, we want "bad military medicine" ended. You and I just may disagree on what it will take for that to happen.🙄
 
Do you think its possible that your concerns were heard but that those in charge were unable to do anything about the problem? Even the SG has to answer to the to Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs.

I think the truth is that the reasons why we are struggling is complex and includes a number of factors:
1. Scarcity of resources
2. Leadership
3. Strain on health system from retirees
4. Increased demand from combat operations

I thought I could chime in here.

During my very crappy Leadership and Management class in ROTC, I asked the CDR at what rank it was actually possible to enact policy changes. He couldn't really come up with an answer so I asked him how much power an O-7 has to change something. The way I understood his reply was that as soon as you reach the flag officer level, you're a higher ranking flag officer's bitch. Like IgD said, I'm sure there are people who are listening to your concerns but there isn't a damn thing they can do about it. The chain of command structure of the military squelches out many issues until they come close to disaster.
 
I thought I could chime in here.

During my very crappy Leadership and Management class in ROTC, I asked the CDR at what rank it was actually possible to enact policy changes. He couldn't really come up with an answer so I asked him how much power an O-7 has to change something. The way I understood his reply was that as soon as you reach the flag officer level, you're a higher ranking flag officer's bitch. Like IgD said, I'm sure there are people who are listening to your concerns but there isn't a damn thing they can do about it. The chain of command structure of the military squelches out many issues until they come close to disaster.


absolutely true. Just like me, a lowly Major in the USAF, Family doc, got "skwelched", I have no doubt that numerous "voices" have been silenced as well. I have spoken personally to each of the USAF FP reps to the Pentagon, and everyone of those colonels spoke of the same type of frustration.
The reason I tend to "slam" the USAF Surgeon General, is because he has the direct ear of congress, and everytime he has had their ear, he filled his speeches with "we are the best, things are great etc" propaganda. This is NOT to say that if he spoke the truth, that everything would be wonderful. No, "the ball" would then be in congress' court and their responsibility to add some needed funding, restructuring etc. As a doc in the USAF, it is NOT my responsibility to "fix the system." No, it is/was my responsibility to bust my ass for my patients and staff, and to speak up when "bad medicine" is obvious. I did that, and realizing that the captain of the ship I was sailing on (the SG), could care less about me, my staff, my patients (at least compared to appearances before congress, promotions, metrics, money), the choice to leave a sinking ship being sunk by its own captain was abvious. Painful, but obvious.👎
 
Only when there is a complete and utter failure of military medicine and there is a huge public outcry will leadership notice. It will have to be catastrophic and involve the death/suffering of a huge number of people. Unfortunately, it is the average Soldier, Sailor, Airman, and Marine that will pay the price. Does this make me feel good? Hell NO! Am I going to keep doing "more with less" and help keep the system barely afloat? Yes, because I care about my patients and will not sacrifice them. Does this just make me an impotent accomplice in the crime that is military medicine? Yes. This is why I don't want others to be in the same position.
 
Only when there is a complete and utter failure of military medicine and there is a huge public outcry will leadership notice. .

it probably would NOT take the complete and utter failure. It probably will take a "public outcry".

I absolutely do not feel significant change will occur if left only to the Surgeon General and his staff/his requests. It will take the public (somebody outside of the chain of command) with some leverage to get the SG off his "metric".
 
The reason I tend to "slam" the USAF Surgeon General, is because he has the direct ear of congress, and everytime he has had their ear, he filled his speeches with "we are the best, things are great etc" propaganda. This is NOT to say that if he spoke the truth, that everything would be wonderful.

I'm not so sure I agree with you, all the surgeon generals (A,N,AF) are as several have mentioned under pressure to fix a system that has been pointed out to be inherently costly and inneficient, they aren't totally stupid. However they are not so stupid to realize that thier survival (as is the survival of thier branch of medicine, personally I think the Navy is in the MOST trouble because of the GMO program) is in BIG jeaprody. So if they go in front of congress and show some balls say "Madam congresswoman, things in military medicine are most certainly SNAFU. Congress and the Joint services staff need to give us the resources to make some MAJOR changes" guess who gets "retired" the next morning, also guess who's service starts seeing dollars and recruitment fall even more than they are now on the medicial side.
 
I'm not so sure I agree with you, all the surgeon generals (A,N,AF) are as several have mentioned under pressure to fix a system that has been pointed out to be inherently costly and inneficient, they aren't totally stupid. However they are not so stupid to realize that thier survival (as is the survival of thier branch of medicine, personally I think the Navy is in the MOST trouble because of the GMO program) is in BIG jeaprody. So if they go in front of congress and show some balls say "Madam congresswoman, things in military medicine are most certainly SNAFU. Congress and the Joint services staff need to give us the resources to make some MAJOR changes" guess who gets "retired" the next morning, also guess who's service starts seeing dollars and recruitment fall even more than they are now on the medicial side.

I have no doubt that the SGs are smart. I just question their integrity. I do not expect them to go before congress and mention only the broken aspects of military medicine. There are good things that get done and they deserve mentioning. I do expect that the SG is smart enough, and tactful enough to come up with a way to let congress realize the deep problems without getting himself fired on the spot.

And in terms of cost savings; what a waste to put docs thru med school, lose all the "man-hours" taken up during an initial 4 years in the military doing C4 training, emeds, learning all the military aspects of medicine, learning the military EMR system etc,.....then losing almost all of these docs because the system is so broken, and then starting over again with a new group of novice physicians. This is not to say that even close to 100% of docs would stay if the system were mended to a reasoneble extent, but I would have stayed and know many others who would of as well.
 
Interesting discussion, long but interesting. I have enjoyed the USAF. However, one should remember one person's issues is not reflective of all members of the Armed Forces.

I worked the civilan sector prior to the military. I found a family in the service vs. the cut throat environment in the civilain sector. There are good and bad points in every position, mostly it's what you make of it. I found the means to accept the responsbilites and work to improve my (our) work environment for the better. I learned very quickly that you can expend energy working against the system or finding solutions. I found it easier working on solutions.

I believe it was stated in an earlier post that nearly 33% of all post have come from USAFDoc. Since USAFDoc works only 40 hours a week in Michigan, he evidently have more time to devote to this thread bashing the institution I hold so dear.

Everyone, you can take USAF's advice, or you can make your own decisions. Sign me 20+ and counting.
 
the cut throat environment in the civilain sector.

The civilian sector's environment may be "cut throat" as you say, but the AF medical corps(e) environment is malignant. A malignancy that needs to be treated as such.
 
I worked the civilan sector prior to the military. I found a family in the service vs. the cut throat environment in the civilain sector. There are good and bad points in every position, mostly it's what you make of it. I found the means to accept the responsbilites and work to improve my (our) work environment for the better. I learned very quickly that you can expend energy working against the system or finding solutions. I found it easier working on solutions.

I have had some great co-workers, but a "family" is pushing it. I had that experience 10-15 years ago as a line officer in a small squadron, but outside of my clinic area I ain't seeing no family behavior. People aren't taking care of each other or our patients. The other day I heard someone answering the phone in the ortho clinic at 3:30 pm-it was a FP doc with a patient with some sort of fracture. The tech said they were closed for PT and if they put a consult in the computer, someone would look at it tomorrow. Now maybe it didn't need to be seen right away, but wouldn't it be nice to have someone looking out for that patient?? Nope, closed for PT, no caring here.

I agree it is difficult to work against the system, and you can find some solutions to some issues that you can fix.

I'm glad you've enjoyed your career. I would be interested to know what specialty you're in and if you're still clinical or in an administrative job.
 
Everyone, you can take USAF's advice, or you can make your own decisions. Sign me 20+ and counting.

If it were only USAFdoc talking here, you might have a point. As it happens, the rest of us have experienced many of the same problems and "crazymakers," and we also punched out at the earliest opportunity.

Please share some specialty info and clinical workload/unit information with the group.
 
Interesting discussion, long but interesting. I have enjoyed the USAF. However, one should remember one person's issues is not reflective of all members of the Armed Forces.

I worked the civilan sector prior to the military. I found a family in the service vs. the cut throat environment in the civilain sector. There are good and bad points in every position, mostly it's what you make of it. I found the means to accept the responsbilites and work to improve my (our) work environment for the better. I learned very quickly that you can expend energy working against the system or finding solutions. I found it easier working on solutions.

Everyone, you can take USAF's advice, or you can make your own decisions. Sign me 20+ and counting.

1) My experience may not be the same as 100% of all members of the USAF, HOWEVER, they are indicative of 100% of the USAF Family docs I knew/know/personally spoke with during my career. You can read the other posts on who I spoke with, military conferneces I went to, and the word was consistent, consistently bad.

2) 20+ and counting; thank you (sincerely) for your service. I would bet however, that you are no longer a full time clinician and certainly not a full time clinic FP in the USAF judging by the rose colored glasses you are wearing.

3) I want everyone to make their own decsions too! The only difference is that I want them to be aware that what the goverment and USAF advertise as military medicine is a far cry from what it is. I absolutely encourage them to contact officers in the specialty they plan on doing (officers in their first tour) and see how they feel about their decision to join the military as a doc. I recommend placing little weight on what recruiters say and people no longer functioning as clinicians say about the current status of milmed.

4) I have not found the civilian environment to be "cut-throat". I did not find the military sector to be "cut-throat" either. I just found the military sector overwhelmed with a lack of support staff, lack of resources, TRICARE problems, micromanaging, disregard for patient safety in many ways, and disregard for staff. This was the take of nearly 100% of the techs, nurses, and docs. They only people that I found to say otherwise were administrative personel like yourself (I presume that is your situation considering you are 20+). You giving a description of your current duties would be appreciated and give an appropriate support for your opinions.
 
I have had some great co-workers, but a "family" is pushing it. I had that experience 10-15 years ago as a line officer in a small squadron, but outside of my clinic area I ain't seeing no family behavior. People aren't taking care of each other or our patients. The other day I heard someone answering the phone in the ortho clinic at 3:30 pm-it was a FP doc with a patient with some sort of fracture. The tech said they were closed for PT and if they put a consult in the computer, someone would look at it tomorrow. Now maybe it didn't need to be seen right away, but wouldn't it be nice to have someone looking out for that patient?? Nope, closed for PT, no caring here.

I agree it is difficult to work against the system, and you can find some solutions to some issues that you can fix.

I'm glad you've enjoyed your career. I would be interested to know what specialty you're in and if you're still clinical or in an administrative job.


Leadership. Someone, i.e. a uniformed officer and physician, needs to straighten out your corpsmen/medics if they are doing the above and not ignore the problem. This problem and many others could have simplified by a physician to physician conversation, rather than letting an E-3 handle this.

We, in the kindler and gentler military, seem unwilling to get in someone's face and straighten them out. Start fixing the easy things first, such as patient courtesy and work at fixing the realistic problems. These are things you can change and make your department a little bit better for the patients and the staff.
 
Leadership. Someone, i.e. a uniformed officer and physician, needs to straighten out your corpsmen/medics if they are doing the above and not ignore the problem. This problem and many others could have simplified by a physician to physician conversation, rather than letting an E-3 handle this.

We, in the kindler and gentler military, seem unwilling to get in someone's face and straighten them out. Start fixing the easy things first, such as patient courtesy and work at fixing the realistic problems. These are things you can change and make your department a little bit better for the patients and the staff.

part of the solution is the Physician standing up for what is the right thing to do.

part of the problem is that military medicine has been designed such that the tech IS NOT working for the docs, but rather for the nurses. And it is the nurses that RUN the clinic (ie make the admin decisions).

another part of the problem is exampled here; the worst tech in our clinic was coming up on the decision to re-enlist or not. What did the nurses do? They made this tech the "airman of the quarter" hoping this would persuade this tech to re-up.
 
Leadership. Someone, i.e. a uniformed officer and physician, needs to straighten out your corpsmen/medics if they are doing the above and not ignore the problem. This problem and many others could have simplified by a physician to physician conversation, rather than letting an E-3 handle this.

We, in the kindler and gentler military, seem unwilling to get in someone's face and straighten them out. Start fixing the easy things first, such as patient courtesy and work at fixing the realistic problems. These are things you can change and make your department a little bit better for the patients and the staff.

Here's the problem which straightening out your enlisted. A significant number are just trying to get through their 6 years and get out. Many don't care. They don't care if you're mad, they don't care if you don't like them as a physician, they don't care if they leave patients desiring more. They don't care because they get medals for breathing. They get 5's on their EPR's because trying to give them anything less requires congressional approval. They know that even if you get on their case, worst thing that will happen is that they will get sent to a different duty section, because the military is short on bodies and they're not going to remove a viable body no matter how inert.

I cannot tell you the number of times I've taken staff out to lunch, I've given them cards of appreciation, I've had them over to my house for a get together. They profess how much they like working for me rather than others and do you know what still happens. Paperwork gets lossed almost daily, faxes aren't sent, equipment isn't ordered, patients are kept waiting, they disappear for blocks of time doing who knows what, they forget to set up rooms, they don't keep rooms stocked, and on and on and on.

As for the contract civilians--I can't do a thing to fire them. I'm not even allowed to chastise them. I have to go to their civilian manager and complain and when I do, nothing happens.

The system is so messed up that even the simple things aren't simple.
 
Here's the problem which straightening out your enlisted. A significant number are just trying to get through their 6 years and get out. Many don't care. They don't care if you're mad, they don't care if you don't like them as a physician, they don't care if they leave patients desiring more. They don't care because they get medals for breathing. They get 5's on their EPR's because trying to give them anything less requires congressional approval. They know that even if you get on their case, worst thing that will happen is that they will get sent to a different duty section, because the military is short on bodies and they're not going to remove a viable body no matter how inert.

I cannot tell you the number of times I've taken staff out to lunch, I've given them cards of appreciation, I've had them over to my house for a get together. They profess how much they like working for me rather than others and do you know what still happens. Paperwork gets lossed almost daily, faxes aren't sent, equipment isn't ordered, patients are kept waiting, they disappear for blocks of time doing who knows what, they forget to set up rooms, they don't keep rooms stocked, and on and on and on.

As for the contract civilians--I can't do a thing to fire them. I'm not even allowed to chastise them. I have to go to their civilian manager and complain and when I do, nothing happens.

The system is so messed up that even the simple things aren't simple.


the building "teamwork" morale issue reminded me of some similar situations at my base. Me and another family doc would take our "team" out to lunch on a regular basis (a few times a month). This ended up falling by the wayside for a couple reasons:

1) changes to the "team". I had more than 25 changes to the members of my PCO/PCM Family Med team during the last 3 years. Some were unavoidable (deployments), most were just ridiculous with no good reason. How do you build teamwork with that kind of turnover?

2) Lack of lunch. For that last 1 year or so, lunch became a thing of the past. seeing 30+ patients a day with the help a a single tech left no time for luxuries like a lunchbreak.

3) We didn't have to worry about firing civilian nurses. 100% quit because of the unsafe patient care practices and management...100% :idea:
 
I am a military GMO rolling into my last bit of obligated service before I get out. If anyone has not already made the commitment (if you have, there is not point), please post any specific questions you have about HPSP. I will do my best to answer them. I am patriotic, am glad I had a chance to serve my country. But common sense dictates that the many anti-HPSP posts you see must have been prompted by something. I will try to be as balanced as I can. I have experienced just about all the highs and lows that can happen during your several years "in", including serving in CENTCOM, failing a PRT during internship, having fantastic senior officers and others who were very difficult to deal with. If you are a gung-ho red stater or a recruiter/similar, please don't bother as you already have all the answers. If you are ashamed of being American, and already hate the military, likewise please spare me your pain. If you are like most of us, somewhere in the middle and looking for some (relatively) objective information, I might be of help. The program is a boon for some people; others should steer clear. If brought in without knowing the facts, they will ultimately be harmful to the military effort. So I think I will be doing a service by letting any genuinely undecided people know what the great things are in the program, and what the painful parts are.
 
I am a military GMO rolling into my last bit of obligated service before I get out. If anyone has not already made the commitment (if you have, there is not point), please post any specific questions you have about HPSP. I will do my best to answer them. I am patriotic, am glad I had a chance to serve my country. But common sense dictates that the many anti-HPSP posts you see must have been prompted by something. I will try to be as balanced as I can. I have experienced just about all the highs and lows that can happen during your several years "in", including serving in CENTCOM, failing a PRT during internship, having fantastic senior officers and others who were very difficult to deal with. If you are a gung-ho red stater or a recruiter/similar, please don't bother as you already have all the answers. If you are ashamed of being American, and already hate the military, likewise please spare me your pain. If you are like most of us, somewhere in the middle and looking for some (relatively) objective information, I might be of help. The program is a boon for some people; others should steer clear. If brought in without knowing the facts, they will ultimately be harmful to the military effort. So I think I will be doing a service by letting any genuinely undecided people know what the great things are in the program, and what the painful parts are.

look fwd to hearing of your experiences.

1) I think we all are somewhere in "the middle"....I do not know of anyone who is ashamed of being American/hates our military etc.
2) I would love to know what you consider the "great parts" of being a FP in todays USAF.
3) Thanks for your service, and best wishes on the civilian career. After being USAF primary care, everything seems pretty low stress in the civilian world of medicine to me. You will likely find the same "greener pastures" with a few weeds here and there.

welcome on board SDN. 👍
 
Thanks. I realize there are few really polarized folks out there, just thought I would narrow the discussion down to those who don't have any major axes to grind from the get-go. I guess the thing I have most appreciated is the opportunity to practice medicine in Japan, a really interesting country which I wouldn't have been able to live and work in otherwise (not in medicine, anyway). Also, I like rubbing shoulders with the salt of the earth. I find the pretensions of an all-smart people atmosphere a bit nauseating at times. This type of atmosphere is pretty common on the civilian side. Financially, I think you could argue either side. Personally, I still have a lot of student loans because I went to a private school in NYC and had a family to support. But they're about $200,000 less than what they would have been. However, I am also four years behind my school fellows: still a GMO, I have three years of residency to go before I am a normally employable doc on the outside. However, my military experience enabled me to be accepted into a top civilian program, which I was not competitive for immediately out of medical school. As far as the minuses, well there are some but I had a few civilian jobs prior and so feel like every job has its painful parts (that's why they pay you to work and not vice versa)... I would say in summary: do it if you consider it to be an opportunity to serve your country. If it is a purely financial/self-oriented decision, you will likely be disappointed. But then folks who always think that way will likely be disappointed with most things in life...
Again, I will be happy to answer (from my own limited perspective) any specific questions from folks who have not yet signed up and want to know what to expect. I will try to be objective. I'm not so interested in a discussion with other military docs or prior military docs, because that is sort of unending and ultimately unfruitful.
 
Thanks. I realize there are few really polarized folks out there, just thought I would narrow the discussion down to those who don't have any major axes to grind from the get-go. I guess the thing I have most appreciated is the opportunity to practice medicine in Japan, a really interesting country which I wouldn't have been able to live and work in otherwise (not in medicine, anyway). Also, I like rubbing shoulders with the salt of the earth. I find the pretensions of an all-smart people atmosphere a bit nauseating at times. This type of atmosphere is pretty common on the civilian side. Financially, I think you could argue either side. Personally, I still have a lot of student loans because I went to a private school in NYC and had a family to support. But they're about $200,000 less than what they would have been. However, I am also four years behind my school fellows: still a GMO, I have three years of residency to go before I am a normally employable doc on the outside. However, my military experience enabled me to be accepted into a top civilian program, which I was not competitive for immediately out of medical school. As far as the minuses, well there are some but I had a few civilian jobs prior and so feel like every job has its painful parts (that's why they pay you to work and not vice versa)... I would say in summary: do it if you consider it to be an opportunity to serve your country. If it is a purely financial/self-oriented decision, you will likely be disappointed. But then folks who always think that way will likely be disappointed with most things in life...
Again, I will be happy to answer (from my own limited perspective) any specific questions from folks who have not yet signed up and want to know what to expect. I will try to be objective. I'm not so interested in a discussion with other military docs or prior military docs, because that is sort of unending and ultimately unfruitful.

[Bolds mine.]

I take it you did not do that civilian work as a physician, if you came into the service through HPSP. Not to criticise you, but you are comparing apples to oranges.

And please let's not trivialize the money issue. Anyone who says the money from the scholarship isn't a good reason to join, or shouldn't be the main reason, or something similar is not being honest. The scholarship money is the main reason and in fact is an essential reason for joining. Imagine trying to pay for living and paying off a full load of loans on a military medical income without the additional bonuses that go to fully trained doctors, which is the circumstance most new doctors would find themselves facing, entering through the HPSP portal. It would be difficult if not impossible. The relevant issue is whether the value of the scholarship makes the problems with lack of support for residency training, professional practice support, staffing and continuing educational support worth the reduced debt. Please speak to that.

Lots of us were able to successfully continue with our careers after the military. Many of us were able to obtain desirable residencies and fellowships also. I don't necessarily think that should be seen to the credit of the services, as the HPSP program was once competitive to get into and attracted students who were motivated and could and did place well in their medical school classes. Many would have been competitive residency applicants even without the military. As you know, with much of the HPSP classes not filling in recent years, that may no longer be as true. If your examination of the benefits of the HPSP program does not include that phenomenon, then I think you are leaving out of your assessment the very real and present deterrents to the HPSP program that has affected its ability to remain attractive and competitive.

The services have dishonored many of the promises that were made with recruitment to HPSP in years past and have been doing that long enough that there is now a large enough number of former military doctors with experience enough to say the program isn't worth what the service recruiters say it is worth. One or two or ten unhappy people wouldn't make much of a difference, but I am afraid the numbers are far greater than that. And most are not aware of this site, or are otherwise involved in their post-military lives that they aren't posting to online sites their criticisms. But those sentiments still get heard, and where those people are listened to by prospective medical students who might have questions about military medical service through the HPSP, the message isn't all that bullish. Empty promises and outright lies make a durable and poor impression, even of organizations that never want to think of themselves of deserving that reputation, even those with tens of millions of taxpayer dollars to spend on telling people otherwise.
 
That being said, potential applicants need to have information, both about positives and negatives. Perhaps I am idealistic but I do see positive things, and see change on the horizon (at least I hope).


As far as rose colored glasses...No one should doubt that I have a tremendous list of gripes with the military healthcare system and the military in general and our civilian leadership. I have made these known at high levels (hopefully won't get any Polonium 120 in my coffee for my efforts 🙂 ). I can't imagine staying past 20 years even if that means retiring at a lower rank and thus retirement pay scale. That being said, I like many are struggling to keep a stressed and in many ways failing system afloat. It however takes a influx of bright, energetic people who are willing to do their time, even if it comes with major downsides.

In most respects, I think I have more in common with most posters that not -exceptions being Corpse, or USAFdoc. The difference perhaps is intent, my goal is to make an essential system better for all rather than to write 750 posts trashing it.

There is no use complaining about big Army, no one can change the entire system, however if each person fixes his small piece, systemic changes occur.

I'm trying to fix my little piece of the Army.

Later

perhaps the biggest difference between me and A1 is that he/she believes that if all of us idealsitic docs all give all we have to change the system, we can change it. While I and others have given 100% to give the best care we could (and that does make a difference), I am no longer deluded into thinking that the SG and people on that level will be convinced to make changes based on our hard work and our suggestions to make things better. In fact, it is the tremendous hard work of military docs against "Admin friendly fire" that enables the system to continue its slow march down the tube versus just completely failing and needing immediate restructuring. In that regard, the "broken militarty medicine" status quo is maintained by the admirable, but flawed reasoning of A1.
 
So after spending a week reading through what feels like 1000+ posts on the horrors I am supposedly going to end up working in, just had a quick question.

The most unhappy people on this site seem to be Primary Care and returning GMOs who couldn't get into their preferred residency. Are there any surgeons/surgical residents who read these strings and may have some opinion on the quality of their work environment? And I don't mean second-hand info like, "All the surgeons I know are miserable and can't wait to get out . . .", I already read those posts.

I'm not trying to discount the experiences of the Medicine/FP folks, it's just that I matched to a surgical specialty, and the majority of Staff surgeons I interacted with this year seemed generally satisfied with their choice to join up. I recognize though, that they're not going to air all their grievances with a med student, so I thought someone here might give me a more honest opinion.
 
It appears that most of the disgruntled on this set or posts are active duty bound..However, I'm trying to get some feedback of doing a civilian residency while also serving in the AF reserve. Before I hear from the recruiter, I was hoping to hear the "real story". Whats the committment? Two weeks a year? one weekend a month? Iraq? Aghganistan? pay grade? student loan payback? Thanks.
 
So after spending a week reading through what feels like 1000+ posts on the horrors I am supposedly going to end up working in, just had a quick question.

The most unhappy people on this site seem to be Primary Care and returning GMOs who couldn't get into their preferred residency. Are there any surgeons/surgical residents who read these strings and may have some opinion on the quality of their work environment? And I don't mean second-hand info like, "All the surgeons I know are miserable and can't wait to get out . . .", I already read those posts.

I'm not trying to discount the experiences of the Medicine/FP folks, it's just that I matched to a surgical specialty, and the majority of Staff surgeons I interacted with this year seemed generally satisfied with their choice to join up. I recognize though, that they're not going to air all their grievances with a med student, so I thought someone here might give me a more honest opinion.


Here's my experience as a surgeon (otolaryngology) in the AF:

1) I entered not knowing if I would stay in longer than my ADSC, but it took about 4 months before I realized anything longer than my 3 years was going to be a huge mistake.

2) When I started at my base we were a hospital with inpt beds, an ED, and 10 surgeons in the flight. When I leave this summer, I'm leaving a clinic (hospital closed) with a UCC, and only 1 surgeon left (an orthopod). Every surgeon I know has gotten out immediately when their ADC was up, they wouldn't even stay an extra 3 months to get the Oct bonus worth around 28-36K depending on specialty.

3) I am understaffed. I'm slotted for 3 staff members, I have 1.

4) I am underfunded. It took 2.5 years to have 8yo flexible scopes updated to ones that even meet standard of care. I wasn't even able to evaluate kids until this new scope came in.

5) I am overworked.
a)Not with patients. I don't see enough patients. I see maybe 16/day. But if I see more, the amount of work I generate keeps my one AD staff around until 1800 or later, and when the work day generally finishes around 1630, I find that inappropriate and am not going to do that for him.

b) I'm overworked because I have to do everything myself. I don't have a nurse. I have to call every pt back because techs aren't allowed to give medical advice over the phone. Mine does as much as possible, but he knows he can't do it as much as he's capable because someone will give him trouble.

c) Here's what I have to do to do an inpatient surgery: I have to submit a consult request to who? Myself. Why? because that's what TriCare says I have to do. They say there's no way to avoid this. Once I submit the consult, since I'm the only AD ENT guy, I have to approve my consult to myself. The great thing is that I get 3 e-mails confirming each step.

d) To do outpt surgery at our clinic, even for a set of tubes that will take 5 mins max OR time, I take about 15 mins to fill out a pre-op packet. Within this packet, I have to write out "Recurrent Acute Otitis Media" or whatever the Dx is 5x on 4 sheets of paper among other stuff (twice on the same page and I can't write "see above"). I am not supposed to use abbreviations even though I do.

e) At one point the JAG office told us we would have to hand write consents instead of using pre-printed ones. I threatened to take this to an ADC and they finally relented when I was able to get letter signed from community surgeons indicating that this was not the standard of care. I had to do it though.

f) I don't mind doing the AD training stuff even though it's ridiculously stupid. That's just part of being military. I do not like how much there is and how much it takes me away from my clinical work. In fact, there was one time I finished CBRNE training and took the mandatory test (took about an hour or so) in March--it's supposed to be good for 12 months. Then, because ACC changed their policy and wanted everyone to train at the same time each year, I had to redo everything again just 4 months later. However, this time I had to go do the remedial course they said would take about 8 hours and gave me 20 days to accomplish it. Maddening. Fortunately, I combine efforts with a fellow MD and we did it together in like 2.5hrs.

g) Our OR is understaffed and manned only by CRNA's. If a kid has anything close to resembling a URI, I have to reschedule because they are too skitish to do the anesthetic. I cancel at least one surgery a week because of this. We don't have enough CRNA's to run all the rooms that we need to when one is on leave and therefore cases pile up and patients get mad.

h) I'm on call 24/7/365 because I'm the only ENT. Granted call isn't killer because every patient is my own and I do a lot of teaching so I don't get nervous Mommy calls at 2AM, but I have no control over the guy who waits until midnight to come in with the peritonsillar abscess that's been brewing for 3 days.

i) I'll stop on this section, because it's just depressing

6) I don't get paid on time. Oct 1 comes every year at the same time. I'm supposed to get 30K each year on Oct 1. An amount I count on as part of my salary. I'm trying to get out of debt and fund Christmas and whatever else I have budgeted, but when they fail to get me money every year on time and sometimes as late as February I have heard from my commander, it puts a significant strain on how I appropriate family funds.

You want to know more, just ask. Click on my name and read my old posts. It's just sickening as a surgeon. I honestly don't know any ENT's other than fellowshipped-trained ones or those who are attendings in residency programs who are staying beyond their ADC's. I'm sure there are some, but of the 8 that entered my year, we're all getting out. Of the 17 the following year that came in, I know of only 1 planning on staying 20 last I head, but he had a 16 year commitment anyway.

The general surgeons that are leaving told me the same thing. The urologist who's left said the same thing. The ophthalmologist is also saying the same. The orthopods, well, I think they've ROADed with 6 months left to go.

It's not just primary care, gmo, flight surgeons.

It's system-wide.

And it's broke.
 
I honestly don't know any ENT's other than fellowshipped-trained ones or those who are attendings in residency programs who are staying beyond their ADC's.

That's really quite depressing.

Have you noticed a big difference between the major MTFs and the rest of the military health care system? I spent a total of three months on rotations at TAMC, NNMC, and NMCSD, and while I noticed a number of minor aggrevations, none of them approached the kinds of things you describe.

That staffing level is particularly disturbing. I suppose they don't budget you for civilian contract nurses? That was how they got bodies in the places I went through . . .
 
That's really quite depressing.

Have you noticed a big difference between the major MTFs and the rest of the military health care system? I spent a total of three months on rotations at TAMC, NNMC, and NMCSD, and while I noticed a number of minor aggrevations, none of them approached the kinds of things you describe.

That staffing level is particularly disturbing. I suppose they don't budget you for civilian contract nurses? That was how they got bodies in the places I went through . . .

at my MTF they contracted for them (civilian nurses) and 100% quit because of the work conditions, 100%. Similar with contracted civilian docs, (not 100% quit though, 8 out of 9 left over 2 year span, thats about 90%). And who do you think ended up covering for the newly enrolled patients for those docs?
 
Here's my experience as a surgeon (otolaryngology) in the AF:

1) I entered not knowing if I would stay in longer than my ADSC, but it took about 4 months before I realized anything longer than my 3 years was going to be a huge mistake.

2) When I started at my base we were a hospital with inpt beds, an ED, and 10 surgeons in the flight. When I leave this summer, I'm leaving a clinic (hospital closed) with a UCC, and only 1 surgeon left (an orthopod). Every surgeon I know has gotten out immediately when their ADC was up, they wouldn't even stay an extra 3 months to get the Oct bonus worth around 28-36K depending on specialty.

3) I am understaffed. I'm slotted for 3 staff members, I have 1.

4) I am underfunded. It took 2.5 years to have 8yo flexible scopes updated to ones that even meet standard of care. I wasn't even able to evaluate kids until this new scope came in.

5) I am overworked.
a)Not with patients. I don't see enough patients. I see maybe 16/day. But if I see more, the amount of work I generate keeps my one AD staff around until 1800 or later, and when the work day generally finishes around 1630, I find that inappropriate and am not going to do that for him.

b) I'm overworked because I have to do everything myself. I don't have a nurse. I have to call every pt back because techs aren't allowed to give medical advice over the phone. Mine does as much as possible, but he knows he can't do it as much as he's capable because someone will give him trouble.

c) Here's what I have to do to do an inpatient surgery: I have to submit a consult request to who? Myself. Why? because that's what TriCare says I have to do. They say there's no way to avoid this. Once I submit the consult, since I'm the only AD ENT guy, I have to approve my consult to myself. The great thing is that I get 3 e-mails confirming each step.

d) To do outpt surgery at our clinic, even for a set of tubes that will take 5 mins max OR time, I take about 15 mins to fill out a pre-op packet. Within this packet, I have to write out "Recurrent Acute Otitis Media" or whatever the Dx is 5x on 4 sheets of paper among other stuff (twice on the same page and I can't write "see above"). I am not supposed to use abbreviations even though I do.

e) At one point the JAG office told us we would have to hand write consents instead of using pre-printed ones. I threatened to take this to an ADC and they finally relented when I was able to get letter signed from community surgeons indicating that this was not the standard of care. I had to do it though.

f) I don't mind doing the AD training stuff even though it's ridiculously stupid. That's just part of being military. I do not like how much there is and how much it takes me away from my clinical work. In fact, there was one time I finished CBRNE training and took the mandatory test (took about an hour or so) in March--it's supposed to be good for 12 months. Then, because ACC changed their policy and wanted everyone to train at the same time each year, I had to redo everything again just 4 months later. However, this time I had to go do the remedial course they said would take about 8 hours and gave me 20 days to accomplish it. Maddening. Fortunately, I combine efforts with a fellow MD and we did it together in like 2.5hrs.

g) Our OR is understaffed and manned only by CRNA's. If a kid has anything close to resembling a URI, I have to reschedule because they are too skitish to do the anesthetic. I cancel at least one surgery a week because of this. We don't have enough CRNA's to run all the rooms that we need to when one is on leave and therefore cases pile up and patients get mad.

h) I'm on call 24/7/365 because I'm the only ENT. Granted call isn't killer because every patient is my own and I do a lot of teaching so I don't get nervous Mommy calls at 2AM, but I have no control over the guy who waits until midnight to come in with the peritonsillar abscess that's been brewing for 3 days.

i) I'll stop on this section, because it's just depressing

6) I don't get paid on time. Oct 1 comes every year at the same time. I'm supposed to get 30K each year on Oct 1. An amount I count on as part of my salary. I'm trying to get out of debt and fund Christmas and whatever else I have budgeted, but when they fail to get me money every year on time and sometimes as late as February I have heard from my commander, it puts a significant strain on how I appropriate family funds.

You want to know more, just ask. Click on my name and read my old posts. It's just sickening as a surgeon. I honestly don't know any ENT's other than fellowshipped-trained ones or those who are attendings in residency programs who are staying beyond their ADC's. I'm sure there are some, but of the 8 that entered my year, we're all getting out. Of the 17 the following year that came in, I know of only 1 planning on staying 20 last I head, but he had a 16 year commitment anyway.

The general surgeons that are leaving told me the same thing. The urologist who's left said the same thing. The ophthalmologist is also saying the same. The orthopods, well, I think they've ROADed with 6 months left to go.

It's not just primary care, gmo, flight surgeons.

It's system-wide.

And it's broke.

Unfortunately this is a DEAD ON assesment of what is happening AF wide, be it dinky clinic, or so called major medical centers. We too lost our nurse to 5 surgeons, and had to do much of our own paperwork, scheduling, phone calling, etc etc.

It just is so bad that it seems imposible to make people undertand how much it really sucks without them thinking we are exagerating for our own purpose which has been loosely stated to completely stop the flow of naive physicians into the system so that someone will realize a major paradigm shift needs to occur NOW. As it is, with this administration and all the problems that this country is facing now, I see military medicine continuing to decline and rot for a much longer time. I only hope people thinking about joining are able to read this, and ASK hard questions of their recruiters, and of current active duty docs.
 
Unfortunately this is a DEAD ON assesment of what is happening AF wide, be it dinky clinic, or so called major medical centers. We too lost our nurse to 5 surgeons, and had to do much of our own paperwork, scheduling, phone calling, etc etc.

It just is so bad that it seems imposible to make people undertand how much it really sucks without them thinking we are exagerating for our own purpose which has been loosely stated to completely stop the flow of naive physicians into the system so that someone will realize a major paradigm shift needs to occur NOW. As it is, with this administration and all the problems that this country is facing now, I see military medicine continuing to decline and rot for a much longer time. I only hope people thinking about joining are able to read this, and ASK hard questions of their recruiters, and of current active duty docs.

Too bad you can't sue the gov't for false advertising, etc, and get out of HPSP obligations early.

http://www.airforce.com/careers/subcatg.php?catg_id=3&sub_catg_id=1

• No malpractice premiums or business hassles
• Opportunity to work with a highly trained healthcare team in top-rate medical facilities with the most high-tech equipment
• Excellent healthcare coverage and retirement benefits
• Continued education and training
 
• No malpractice premiums or business hassles
• Opportunity to work with a highly trained healthcare team in top-rate medical facilities with the most high-tech equipment
• Excellent healthcare coverage and retirement benefits
• Continued education and training

Well, in all fairness, is this really false advertising?

1) No malpractice premiums or business hassles - by definition, isn't this true?

2) Opportunity to work with . . . - okay, so from what I read here, apparently that's not the actual experience . . .

3) Excellent healthcare coverage and retirement benefits - the military retirement package has no equal in the civilian world, save a few CEOs with golden parachutes. And while a lot of people have issues with the quality of the health care, you can't beat the price. (I picked up a Z-pack today for sinusitis. $50. For six pills. Damn.)

4) Continued education and training - sure it incurs additional obligation, but it happens.

I respect the experience of the people on this site who are disappointed with the system, but really, keep it honest.
 
Well, in all fairness, is this really false advertising?

1) No malpractice premiums or business hassles - by definition, isn't this true?

2) Opportunity to work with . . . - okay, so from what I read here, apparently that's not the actual experience . . .

3) Excellent healthcare coverage and retirement benefits - the military retirement package has no equal in the civilian world, save a few CEOs with golden parachutes. And while a lot of people have issues with the quality of the health care, you can't beat the price. (I picked up a Z-pack today for sinusitis. $50. For six pills. Damn.)

4) Continued education and training - sure it incurs additional obligation, but it happens.

I respect the experience of the people on this site who are disappointed with the system, but really, keep it honest.




OK, honest:

THe retirement insurance is CRAP!!!!!!!!!!! There are many physicians who will not even take tricare because it pays lower than medicaid. The VA system...........I don't think I have to argue that on multiple levels its below par, and certainly FAR from "excellent."

"continued" education??? Well ask the 4 yr GMO's what kind of education they got. The GME system in the military is as rotten as the whole system, with likely few exceptions that I'm sure at this pace will not last. So yeah it happens, but why choose to have a substandard education and a substandard experience if you have the choice, especially as a prospective HPSP'er, to read this forum, take heed, talk to people/physicians, and make a more informed decision??

So we are being honest, the system is totally down the crapper!!! You do not pay malpractice because thanks to the Feres Doctrine you can't sue the federal goverment when you are in the military. That is the only true statement you made.
 
As I stated in a earlier post - the USAF does not want to be in the business of healthcare. There is a concerted effort to privatize the system, and thus cut personnel. Thus there is little interest in supporting the provider. I have friends who are USAF primary care docs and they sound a lot like USAFdoc. They lament that the USAF still buys into the concept of moving them every 2-3 years despite the stress it places on families and the disruption of clinic activies/continuity for patients.

At least the Army figured out that moving a doc for the sake of variety/career progression doesn't do much for retention (of course it does happen to people still as "needs of the Army" trumps the individual as it should but is less often than before). As a system the Army has moved to the concept of home base stabilization in response to the realization that spouses have careers, and kids often do better with a little stability.

I find it interesting that the USAF filled their HPSP slots this year. I find this laughable as of the three services they have the most inferior clinics/hospitals, and contrary to one might guess, have way more military readiness crap that the Army. They do however have slick recruiting displays with jets, pictures of jets, and rockets!... woo.. I can only conclude it is the flightsuits and the USAF's uncanny ability to deploy for 4 months, to hardship spots like Kuwait, Bahrain, and Qatar, and then get a bronze star for their tough duty.

The USAF also has the uncanny ability to shift work to the Army facilities if their is one nearby. With all the warts that the Army medical system has, it does have many positives over the USAF and frankly I can't think of a positive of the USAF over the Army. Perhaps someone can help me. I wish the USAF system were better for my friends in the USAF but alas, not the case.


On a slightly unrelated topic... Below are excerpts from an interesting MSNBC article.

'Medals inflation?' http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4243092/

More than 69,000 awards and other honors have been handed out by the Air Force for the Iraq war, according to Air Force Capt. Richard Johnson. The list also includes four Air Force Crosses, one step below the Medal of Honor, plus 21 Silver Stars and over 1,900 Bronze Stars.

Stephen Mackey, director of the Marine Corps medals and decorations branch, says the Corps has issued no Silver Stars or Navy Crosses to date for Iraq war service.

“We have a good number of medals in the pipeline, and it represents about the right scale given the scope and fighting the Marines did,” he says.

Medals to date include 200 Bronze Stars, 447 Purple Hearts, a number of air and commendation medals. A bit over 1,000 in all

Wonder how may USAF were in Fallujah?
 
I'm just a stupid med student (and apparently full of crap), so let me make sure I understand this:

1) Retiring after only 20y give you a 50% lifetime pension + health benefits means nothing. "A lot" of physicians won't take Tricare. Guess what? "A lot" of docs are starting to reject Medicare too, which presumably is what you will be relying on when you get old. I assume you have some kind of contact with civilian doctors? Do they rave about Medicare reimbursement rates?

2) You apparently know a lot of doctors on Medicaid. That's fascinating. How did these doctors end up impoverished? Or are you talking about doctors who are also nursing home residents or disabled?

3) Some GMOs have trouble getting into residencies, or continuing their education. This, of course, never happens in the civilian world, where everyone is immediately accepted to their first-choice program in the NRMP match. Or is your argument that anyone who does a GMO is "entitled" to be accepted into residency programs? Also, the fact that you can do fully funded fellowships at civilian programs after residency and your first utilization tour, also means nothing to you.

4) Military training (residencies) suck. I guess that explains the droves of graduates failing their Boards. It also explains the lack of accredidation. It must also be the reason military-trained docs who get out have such a hard time finding work in the civilian world. Oh wait.

5) Oh, and the malpractice and business issues. That's such a small issue. No civilian doc (especially in states like Florida) ever complain about rising malpractice rates and increasing numbers of lawsuits.

And really, for the record, I was suggesting that *you* need to be honest, not the rest of people posting here. I would never argue with the experience of actual physicians who express their frustrations. But your blanket "false advertising" comment was completely off base, and pretty silly.
 
I'm just a stupid med student (and apparently full of crap), so let me make sure I understand this:

1) Retiring after only 20y give you a 50% lifetime pension + health benefits means nothing. "A lot" of physicians won't take Tricare. Guess what? "A lot" of docs are starting to reject Medicare too, which presumably is what you will be relying on when you get old. I assume you have some kind of contact with civilian doctors? Do they rave about Medicare reimbursement rates?

2) You apparently know a lot of doctors on Medicaid. That's fascinating. How did these doctors end up impoverished? Or are you talking about doctors who are also nursing home residents or disabled?

3) Some GMOs have trouble getting into residencies, or continuing their education. This, of course, never happens in the civilian world, where everyone is immediately accepted to their first-choice program in the NRMP match. Or is your argument that anyone who does a GMO is "entitled" to be accepted into residency programs? Also, the fact that you can do fully funded fellowships at civilian programs after residency and your first utilization tour, also means nothing to you.

4) Military training (residencies) suck. I guess that explains the droves of graduates failing their Boards. It also explains the lack of accredidation. It must also be the reason military-trained docs who get out have such a hard time finding work in the civilian world. Oh wait.

5) Oh, and the malpractice and business issues. That's such a small issue. No civilian doc (especially in states like Florida) ever complain about rising malpractice rates and increasing numbers of lawsuits.

And really, for the record, I was suggesting that *you* need to be honest, not the rest of people posting here. I would never argue with the experience of actual physicians who express their frustrations. But your blanket "false advertising" comment was completely off base, and pretty silly.


I'm somewhere in the middle of the both of you.

1 - a) your pension is 50% of your rank, not what you make as a physician. So let's say you leave as an O-5, you're going to get about 35K/yr, not 65K. Do the math, 35k/yr x30 years (life expectancy) or if you get out earlier, at least in my specialty, you'll get about 150k more than you did total after bonuses AF. Now multiply that by 30 years (retire at 65) and the numbers are ridiculous to even say that the pension is worthwhile at least in my specialty. In fact, by numbers alone, I would have to owe over 17yrs to make it financially advantageous to stay in for 20.

b) agree many docs are dropping medicare/medicaid, many aren't accepting TriCare, but institutions which receive federal funds, i.e. any place with a residency program by law has to accept TriCare. The catch is that TriCare might not "approve" the pt to go to that facility. You can't be the cost. You can't. You can beat the care--that cannot be rationally argued. I will be the first to be egotistical and say I can as an ENT offer as good or better care than many of my colleagues, but I have to be honest and say that with my current support/staff/equipment/facilities, I'm often not able to.

2 - no comment

3 - I think it's rare in med school for a student to honestly visualize themselves working as hard as they do to then be a GMO. Really, I know many GMO's who are great people, intelligent, fun to work with, but basically they're forever interns. Who wants to work hard to be the very bottom of the pyramid year after year just because the military decided they didn't want you to do the specialty you really wanted to do. Who wants to put their life on hold because some arbitrary group decides your career development is worthless.

4 - You're right military residencies don't completely suck. The surgical specialties routinely have high averages on their respective inservice exams. But review any RRC statistics and you'll find that they all have significantly lower operative experience than their civilian counterparts. I for one would rather have the skilled surgeon whose done a ton of cases rather than the booksmart guy whose done that many fewer. Other smart people can always help someone out, but bad hands in the OR require much more effort to correct.

The FP residency at my base is so bad they can't even graduate with the min number of deliveries established by the RRC. They probably spend 20% of their training in the MTF these days, the rest at through the University. It's more civilian than military. The residents have mixed feelings about this. They are treated as lower class citizens at the University even though that's where the neat to eat.

5 - If you think you can't get sued in the military you're wrong. You're not paying the premiums, but give me a break. I'll pay my $22k premium for the additional $150k in salary I'll make next year. Just as crucial for getting jobs throughout your career not to mention credentials is staying away from the NPD as much as possible. You can get placed on the NPD just as easy from the military as you can in the civilian world.
 
I'm just a stupid med student (and apparently full of crap), so let me make sure I understand this:

1) Retiring after only 20y give you a 50% lifetime pension + health benefits means nothing. "A lot" of physicians won't take Tricare. Guess what? "A lot" of docs are starting to reject Medicare too, which presumably is what you will be relying on when you get old. I assume you have some kind of contact with civilian doctors? Do they rave about Medicare reimbursement rates?

You get 50% of an averaged base pay figure on retiring at 20 years, that increases by 2.5% for every year in service beyond 20 until maxed out at 30 years/ 75% base pay. That excludes allowances and bonuses, which for doctors are a large segment of income. For reasons of computation, the career guys used 0-6 with 26 years as a milestone. The deal is not as good as it was before DOPMA, when med school years counted in the 20. The benefits? Tricare for life, which is what was doled out when the medical services were downsized and could not take on retirees, which was a big part of their mission in the past, not just an unfortunate accident of demographics and increased lifespan. Tricare is a crappy insurance plan, make no mistake. In the private practice world, no one is looking for more Tricare business. The beneficiaries are generally a higher caliber of person than those on Medicaid, but the medical needs and poor compensation are not much different. Retired federal government workers get a much better quality plan. Isn't it nice to know that the retired DOD desk worker is better cared for than a retired Colonel?


2) You apparently know a lot of doctors on Medicaid. That's fascinating. How did these doctors end up impoverished? Or are you talking about doctors who are also nursing home residents or disabled?

What are you talking about here? This makes absolutely no sense at all.

3) Some GMOs have trouble getting into residencies, or continuing their education. This, of course, never happens in the civilian world, where everyone is immediately accepted to their first-choice program in the NRMP match. Or is your argument that anyone who does a GMO is "entitled" to be accepted into residency programs? Also, the fact that you can do fully funded fellowships at civilian programs after residency and your first utilization tour, also means nothing to you.

No, what never happens in the civilian world is that applicants who don't match are not compelled to practice medicine independently, removed from supervision and from training for possibly the entire length of their obligated service repayment term. A third-year resident in any training program, civilian or military, has more supervision than any GMO has, despite having at least an extra year of training. What is truly shameful is how the services pretend to the public that this is OK as long as everyone has a medical license, counting on people being just too ignorant to realize that having a license has nothing to do with being fully trained. That kind of moral bankruptcy and utter cynicism is enough to condemn the military medical system by itself. They are taking advantage of the loophole in many archaic state medical board standards that everyone else ignores, since it is just about impossible to get on staff on any civilian hospital without at least having finished a residency and being signed off as board eligible. It is a durable, blatant contempt for the doctors and the patients who depend on them for skillful care.


4) Military training (residencies) suck. I guess that explains the droves of graduates failing their Boards. It also explains the lack of accredidation. It must also be the reason military-trained docs who get out have such a hard time finding work in the civilian world. Oh wait.

Most of the residencies sure aren't what they used to be. Board pass rates are about the only thing going for them. Too bad that better civilian programs also have high pass rates and great surgical volumes.

5) Oh, and the malpractice and business issues. That's such a small issue. No civilian doc (especially in states like Florida) ever complain about rising malpractice rates and increasing numbers of lawsuits.

True, you don't have to worry about paying for malpractice insurance.
But most civilian providers manage to pay their premiums, even in Florida.
If you have no desire to be involved in running a practice business, then the military is one of several options for employed positions that provide office staffing and management. As one poster above said, that does not mean there aren't consequences to malpractice. From what I have heard of and seen in military quality assurance proceedings, you would have thought the notions of fair hearing, peer-review and due process were completely alien to the military. Having procedures in writing means nothing; and the investigations process is wide open to improper command influence and outright corruption.

And really, for the record, I was suggesting that *you* need to be honest, not the rest of people posting here. I would never argue with the experience of actual physicians who express their frustrations. But your blanket "false advertising" comment was completely off base, and pretty silly.

The advertising is deliberately vague and is meant to imply that things run differently than they actually do. That is deception, plain and simple.

I'm just a stupid med student (and apparently full of crap)

No comment.
 
I'm somewhere in the middle of the both of you.

1 - a) your pension is 50% of your rank, not what you make as a physician. So let's say you leave as an O-5, you're going to get about 35K/yr, not 65K. Do the math, 35k/yr x30 years (life expectancy) or if you get out earlier, at least in my specialty, you'll get about 150k more than you did total after bonuses AF. Now multiply that by 30 years (retire at 65) and the numbers are ridiculous to even say that the pension is worthwhile at least in my specialty. In fact, by numbers alone, I would have to owe over 17yrs to make it financially advantageous to stay in for 20.

b) agree many docs are dropping medicare/medicaid, many aren't accepting TriCare, but institutions which receive federal funds, i.e. any place with a residency program by law has to accept TriCare. The catch is that TriCare might not "approve" the pt to go to that facility. You can't be the cost. You can't. You can beat the care--that cannot be rationally argued. I will be the first to be egotistical and say I can as an ENT offer as good or better care than many of my colleagues, but I have to be honest and say that with my current support/staff/equipment/facilities, I'm often not able to.

2 - no comment

3 - I think it's rare in med school for a student to honestly visualize themselves working as hard as they do to then be a GMO. Really, I know many GMO's who are great people, intelligent, fun to work with, but basically they're forever interns. Who wants to work hard to be the very bottom of the pyramid year after year just because the military decided they didn't want you to do the specialty you really wanted to do. Who wants to put their life on hold because some arbitrary group decides your career development is worthless.

4 - You're right military residencies don't completely suck. The surgical specialties routinely have high averages on their respective inservice exams. But review any RRC statistics and you'll find that they all have significantly lower operative experience than their civilian counterparts. I for one would rather have the skilled surgeon whose done a ton of cases rather than the booksmart guy whose done that many fewer. Other smart people can always help someone out, but bad hands in the OR require much more effort to correct.

The FP residency at my base is so bad they can't even graduate with the min number of deliveries established by the RRC. They probably spend 20% of their training in the MTF these days, the rest at through the University. It's more civilian than military. The residents have mixed feelings about this. They are treated as lower class citizens at the University even though that's where the neat to eat.

5 - If you think you can't get sued in the military you're wrong. You're not paying the premiums, but give me a break. I'll pay my $22k premium for the additional $150k in salary I'll make next year. Just as crucial for getting jobs throughout your career not to mention credentials is staying away from the NPD as much as possible. You can get placed on the NPD just as easy from the military as you can in the civilian world.


I see your point on the pension, and obviously for an ENT you are, in comparison to your civilian colleagues, getting financially reamed. I was simply pointing out that there are retirement benefits (something private practice docs have to do for themselves) and they are not trivial. And I realize military docs can be sued, but (correct me if I'm wrong) my understanding is that it is far less common than in the civilian world.

As far as surgical cases go, all I can say is what the program directors told me. Portsmouth General Surg says they do about 1000 cases, which they say is basically average. With the influx of OIF/OEF to Bethesda, General Surg says their chiefs will have about 1500 cases, and Bethesda Ortho says their chiefs will all have over 2000 cases by the end of the year, which is well above average. Certainly there are some concerns about the types of cases they're doing (lots of washouts), but they do meet all the minimums for types of cases, which is something. I don't know anything about Primary Care (and I really don't want to), so of course I have to defer to your knowledge on that.

The GMO trap: I believe you that people get screwed in GMO, but we're all kind of dancing around the other half of the equation. Again correct me if I'm wrong, but my impression is that, in general, people with superior scores still get picked up for the residency programs. Substandard scores won't get you a residency in the civilian world either, outside of the slop leftover in the scramble. As an ENT, I would imagine you are probably much more familiar with this than I am. I'm trying to disrespect the people stuck out in the fleet, but anyone who's been to med school knows what they have to do to get the spots they want . . . enough about that, I'm sure I already managed to piss off a bunch of people.
 
. . . Again correct me if I'm wrong, but my impression is that, in general, people with superior scores still get picked up for the residency programs. Substandard scores won't get you a residency in the civilian world either, outside of the slop leftover in the scramble. As an ENT, I would imagine you are probably much more familiar with this than I am. I'm trying to disrespect the people stuck out in the fleet, but anyone who's been to med school knows what they have to do to get the spots they want . . . enough about that, I'm sure I already managed to piss off a bunch of people.

If it were only that simple. You might not be competitive because you aren't prior service, or possibly the right kind of prior service, good scores notwithstanding.
 
So, to recap:

- no medical malpractice or business issues = true, but you can still be sued
- retirement benefits + healthcare = true, you just think it's not very good
- CE & Fellowships = true, but not everyone has access to them
- great people/facilities = a lot of folks here disagree

False advertising? Hardly. Your central objection seems to be that they don't tell you all the negatives. I can't speak to that, but I know what advertising is, and I'm not all that suprised that the ads don't come with disclaimers. After all, they're selling the military, not a herpes medication.

What are you talking about here? This makes absolutely no sense at all.

Actually it does, but only if you read the post.

The comparison between Tricare and Medicaid is silly. Medicaid is poor impoverished/disabled individuals. I was trying to figure out how a doctor would be on Medicaid. Sorry, next time I'll try to be clearer.

Thanks for the "no comment" on my 'stupid med student/full of crap' reference. That's the first time I've had a surgeon take a crack at me over the internet. In person, by phone, via email, you get kind of used to that after a while. But this was totally new for me. Neat!

In all seriousness though, I do appreciate the docs on this site here. Had I read this 4 years ago, I probably would have passed on HPSP. But since I'm already in and gearing up for my Navy residency, I am glad that I'm getting some perspective on what I'm going to be working with in my career.
 
False advertising? Hardly. Your central objection seems to be that they don't tell you all the negatives. I can't speak to that, but I know what advertising is, and I'm not all that suprised that the ads don't come with disclaimers. After all, they're selling the military, not a herpes medication

No expert on any of this am I, but in my opinion there is considerable difference between the false advertising involved in selling a product to falsely aquire a few bucks from someone, and getting an individual to sign away a significant number of years of their life.
 
And I realize military docs can be sued, but (correct me if I'm wrong) my understanding is that it is far less common than in the civilian world.

As far as surgical cases go, all I can say is what the program directors told me. Portsmouth General Surg says they do about 1000 cases, which they say is basically average. With the influx of OIF/OEF to Bethesda, General Surg says their chiefs will have about 1500 cases, and Bethesda Ortho says their chiefs will all have over 2000 cases by the end of the year, which is well above average. Certainly there are some concerns about the types of cases they're doing (lots of washouts), but they do meet all the minimums for types of cases, which is something. I don't know anything about Primary Care (and I really don't want to), so of course I have to defer to your knowledge on that.
QUOTE]

It is definitely true that it's less likely to get sued in the military, but I think that's not because it's harder, I think a lot has to do with the heirachal system and that it is a more innately intimidating process to go after people who out rank you.

I agree that the programs meet min standards in volume. But quality is a different story. I've said this at least 3 times in various threads, but when I rotated at WHMC, I saw an R-3 argue with another R-3 about who got to do a tonsil. In the civilian programs, you're sick of those within 2 months. That's the flagship, or at least former flagship of AF medicine and you've got 3rd year residents arguing over something we let med students do. Obviously, that program is not an indication of all military surgical residencies, but it should raise flags. Hopefully it's the exception to the rule, but the more I hear the longer I've been in, the less I believe it.
 
The comparison between Tricare and Medicaid is silly.

No... it's more of an apt comparison that you probably realize.

What he's referring to is civilian doctors being reluctant to accept Tricare, because it reimburses poorly. This is also the main reason why many civilian docs don't take Medicaid (among other reasons). Most civilian doctors refuse to be a "Tricare provider" because it takes months to get paid by the government. What they do instead is see the patient as a non-provider, get paid up-front, and the patient gets reimbursement from Tricare.

- no medical malpractice or business issues = true, but you can still be sued

The malpractice issues are there, and it's all above your pay grade. The AF gives providers the Right to Notification, and the Right to Respond in writing, but that's it. As far as legal representation, here's what AFI44-119 says: Significantly involved providers are expected to work openly and honestly with the military attorneys. However, the attorneys work for the United States and are not personal attorneys for the involved provider

You are expected to work with the military attorneys, but those attorneys work for the government... not you. As far as reporting to the NPDB, the Surgeon General does that. Here's the quote from the Army's CQM guidelines regarding NPDB reporting: The reporting of health care personnel (privileged or nonprivileged) is an administrative process; therefore, full due process procedures are not applicable.

As far as "business issues," those do exist in the civilian world, but if problems arise in private practice, you can straight-up FIRE people who are worthless or dishonest. You can also hire more help if you need it... in the military you get what you get. You may not think that's a big deal, but it matters who works for you, and in the civilian world you have control over that.

- CE & Fellowships = true, but not everyone has access to them

Particularly your last year of your payback, when you're not eligible for anything and you're treated like a bastard stepchild. Need to renew that ACLS card before leaving the service? Pay for it yourself, Doc.

- great people/facilities = a lot of folks here disagree

Never had a problem with the people (except those with an entitlement mentality and an "I'll go to your commander if I don't get what I want" chip on their shoulder). The facilities could have been better... but when you work for the government, nothing happens in a hurry.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top