It's pretty simple. A general goal of a government is to maximize the benefits to as many folks as possible. As a share of after-tax income, tax cuts at the top — for both households in the top 1 percent and the top 5 percent — are more than
triple the total value of the tax cuts received for people with incomes in the bottom 60 percent.
[2]
So if you had $10 in tax revenue revenue...
Neutral plan
$5 healthcare
$2 defense
$2 social services for the poor (welfare, Medicaid
$1 misc
GOP plans
$3 to rich
$1 to poor
$5 healthcare
$2 defense
$1 only for social services for poor
Borrow $2
Dem dream plans
$-1 to rich
$ 2 to poor
$ 5 healthcare
$ 2 defense
$ 2 to social services for poor
Which plan helps the poor more?
Which plan is better for national budget?
Can the rich tolerate more taxes without affecting quality of life?
In the end we have to cut or raise revenue. Cuts sound nice but other than massive cuts to health and defense, the only way is to tax the rich.
Tax cuts do help the poor, they just don't help them enough. They help the rich too much. And damage the future financials of the county.
That's what you maga don't seem to understand