Hands down the worst place I've interviewed at.
Our resident said "well, I wish they treated us more humanely".
The residents I talk to were overworked and miserable. I wish I had skipped this interview!!!😱😱😱😱
Well, it is true that there are a ton of medicine programs at the level of BU, i.e. mid-tier type programs. So if you don't match there no biggie, even if you love Boston there are other IM programs that are equal to, or better, than BU.
Here is my take:
1. The taking care of underserved patients, this is something you will get to do at pretty much any large urban IM program. I think BU ludicrously sells this aspect of the program to differentiate themselves from places like the Harvard affiliates. Nationally, the BU affiliates are pretty much mediocre in terms of the actual clinical care provided to patients (look at reviews of hospitals nationwide, BUMC ain't doing that great :-/)
Obviously Harvard's BIDMC is a top tier, in terms of both hospital reputation and the residency program. BU likes to inflate their rep a bit, i.e. they're a legend in their own frontal lobe ;-)
2. The atmosphere at BU can get/be malignant, . . . residents say it is so! The thing is that BU knows this reputation is out there so they sort of sanitize it by calling it "intensive training" and promise you that you learn a lot.
Some attendings really aren't into teaching and you learn more from the senior residents, this is hit and miss. Yes, the patient load is slightly heavy, but that is different from malignancy. Actually, I don't have a major beef with this per se, but the fact that you need an optimal mix of time to work, and time to digest new material in addition to helpful feedback. Patient load is important for training, but a lot of us have seen surgery attendings who are pretty bad yet continue to operate day in and day out. Beyond the drinking from the fire hose method you also need insight into clinical decision making. Any good senior resident worth their salt can shove patients through the system, but some of the finer points of clinical decision making aren't being taught at BU.
3. There isn't good communication with the interns/junior residents as the attendings pretty much like to let things fly on auto-pilot. It is very telling that only recently attendings were "required" to do afternoon rounds, and that the intern has no idea whatsoever why multiple PDs have quit. Something isn't jiving right here. Do you really want to be taught by somebody who is forced to round with you?
4. Fellowship match. A lot of the fellowship matches were at BUMC, . . . they give preference to their residents? But some big names have dropped off the list over the years in some fellowship areas. I think the Harvard affiliates got a lot of applications for fellowships from BU residents simply because they want/need to stay in Boston, but perhaps more often they are looking beyond BU?
5. Having PDs quit is a big red flag. Is there an abrasive higher up or strife among attendings? That the BU IM resident still doesn't know the call schedule, just days away from submitting rank lists, is a red flag in my mind. Every program I interviewed at had a call schedule printed and available for applicants, not that this info is super-critical, but it shows respect for the applicants. When programs change PDs the whole program can change, and no doubt some growing pains will be felt at BU.
6. International Health electives. The availability of International Health electives is poor, though they are reorganizing this. Getting support to do this depends on who you talk to and if they are in the mood to help you set it up. Not a positive selling point of the program as any IM residency program would help you do this to one degree or another.
Just my 2 cents. In the end you need to critically evaluate residency programs yourself and don't buy worn out generalized selling points used year after year.