This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
Get help with your application

Use all the free resources available to you from SDN: articles, guides, expert advising, forums discussions, and school research.

DMikes

Full Member
7+ Year Member
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
@ 16:40 of
Nuclear Chemistry Video Fastmode
in Chad's Videos he wrote the attached picture on the board. Shouldn't the # of protons be 91, not 93?

http://imgur[DOT]com/gallery/CJ8arfD

It appears that my image isn't working. Anyways, what he wrote on the board was that
238, 92 U ----> 2 alpha decays (4,2) + 3 (0,-1) Beta decays + 230, 93 Np
 
Last edited:
Yes I believe that is a mistake:
238, 92 U ---> 4/2 alpha + 4/2 alpha + 0/-1 beta + 0/-1 beta + 0/-1 beta

-------------------4+4+0+0+0= 8 and 238-8 = 230 for mass then 2+2-1-1-1 = 1 then 92 - 1 = 91 for atomic number = 230,91 Pa

we have a combined atomic number of 1 so our missing nuclide will have to have an atomic number of 91 to balance the atomic numbers.