Choosing DO OVER MD?

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
You mock people taking match lists and crusading behind them, then you turn around and take a stereotype and apply it to every DO student and do just the same.

And no it didn't sound pessimistic, it sounded hypocritical.👍

Don't get defensive and start throwing words like "hypocritical" around. I did not label every DO student within a stereotype. You read my post in that way. Again, don't be so defensive.

The reality is, if you go into DO or MD school banking on being the top student, you're in for a very rude awakening.
 
I would actually argue that neither are really noteworthy. I imagine anyone in the middle or even bottom of a class could match to either place. Not exactly what I was talking about.



You know, I dont think he was saying that there are absolutely no DOs but just that there is a strong institutional bias in these programs.

For the record, you were right about Hopkins. There ARE several DOs there- 17 to be exact (I was bored). Of course there are 1,737 doctors there. I think given these numbers anyone would be hard pressed to say that it really is a level playing field.

I'm not saying the Colorado program is uber-competitive....just more competitive than the Harvard program mentioned.

Harvard South Shore has trouble getting anyone.
 
I don't think the craziest, die-hard DO would tell you to pass up a school that cost 1/3 private tuition and was located near your 'family.' These are the factors people continually repeat as important in choosing a school over, and over again. This thread is really starting to get useless because everyone, even if it is super valid, has an n=1 experience. You talk about places like UCSF and UCLA not taking DOs. However, don't you think there are also some ivory towers out there that hand pick people from Ivys and top 10s for their derm, neurosurg, etc programs? Just looked at UCLA's derm program, looked like almost everyone was from a UC school (ranked very highly), and really didn't see anyone from small state schools, no names, etc. Now, is this equal to absolutely no DOs in any FM, IM, OB at UCLA? No, but it just goes to show that there are ALWAYS going to be stuffy old men in white coats who discriminate, and unless you went to Harvard for undergrad, then JH, you'll probably find someone who isn't blown away with your credentials and will want someone else. However, at the end of the day, I guarantee that someone from an AOA derm residency has just as good of odds of setting up a successful derm practice as the guy who went to Yale then did his residency at UCLA.

If you look at top tier programs, there are hardly any DO's. 1 out of 50 or 100 maybe.
 
I'm not saying the Colorado program is uber-competitive....just more competitive than the Harvard program mentioned.

Harvard South Shore has trouble getting anyone.

Harvard South Shore is not worth mentioning. The real Harvards are Brigham, Mass General, and Beth Israel Deaconess. The rest aren't prestigious whatsoever but do give good clinical training. Trust me, I rotated there.
 
The biggest difference I see with DO's vs. MD's is being hands-on with patients. Because DO's have OTM lab from the beginning, I am guessing that DO's may be more comfortable being hands-on with their patients than MD's, at least during clinical rotations. Whether or not that makes a difference down the road is debatable, but that is one of the few differences that may actually exist.

Absolutely false. No difference between DO's and MD's on this one. Being hands on? What...the physical exam is different between the two schools of thought? Come on!
 
God Damn Guys!!!!!!!!!! same old boring ****, OVER & OVER again ....after all, all we need to do is to make enough money to raise family that's it!!!!!!😛 and then we die!!!!!:boom:
 
I want to slap you in the face ...

When I opened this thread, I scrolled down too quickly and this was the first post I read, and I laughed out loud. Maybe I'm just tired.
 
Top