CT anesthesiology fellowship 2022

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
Any thoughts on what a "safe" number of interviews is? Sitting at about 10 (majority with >3-4 positions) and wondering should I keep scheduling if I get more? FWIW larger academic program, good scores throughout and letters
Members don't see this ad.
 
rolypolyoly said:
Anyone heard from Columbia or other Boston programs?
Click to expand...
Not yet. Waiting on those as well. Based on prior years, looks like MGH has sent out at end of January/early February. BWH may be slightly after that and given their technique of only 1 applicant per day is likely more variable.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Members don't see this ad :)
This past week's been pretty quiet for me. I wonder when's a good time to start sending out letters of interest to programs that haven't heard from yet?
 
Anyone has an insight into what factors play a key role in ranking for programs
 
EYY said:
This past week's been pretty quiet for me. I wonder when's a good time to start sending out letters of interest to programs that haven't heard from yet?
Click to expand...
Same here. Heard from UTSW Saturday, but silence otherwise.
 
Hi All,

I'm a dual CCM-ACTA fellow at THI. I created this profile to give a bit of light about the CCM component or dual process (plenty of info about ACTA at THI out there). I used plenty of other people's wisdom while navigating the interview process, and my old residency program had a tradition of answering questions in SDN through a non-personal account. So I decided to pay it forward and give my 2 cents on THI CCM. I think that there are a couple of former THI fellows in this thread, so I expect that they will also add to anything discussed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
THIFellow said:
Hi All,

I'm a dual CCM-ACTA fellow at THI. I created this profile to give a bit of light about the CCM component or dual process (plenty of info about ACTA at THI out there). I used plenty of other people's wisdom while navigating the interview process, and my old residency program had a tradition of answering questions in SDN through a non-personal account. So I decided to pay it forward and give my 2 cents on THI CCM. I think that there are a couple of former THI fellows in this thread, so I expect that they will also add to anything discussed.
Click to expand...
Thanks for doing this? Can you give an insight into the CCM rotations, what ICUs, the faculty manning those ICUs. Thanks.
 
Licious_1 said:
Thanks for doing this? Can you give an insight into the CCM rotations, what ICUs, the faculty manning those ICUs. Thanks.
Click to expand...
Why not talk about CCM in a CCM thread?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
THIFellow said:
Hi All,

I'm a dual CCM-ACTA fellow at THI. I created this profile to give a bit of light about the CCM component or dual process (plenty of info about ACTA at THI out there). I used plenty of other people's wisdom while navigating the interview process, and my old residency program had a tradition of answering questions in SDN through a non-personal account. So I decided to pay it forward and give my 2 cents on THI CCM. I think that there are a couple of former THI fellows in this thread, so I expect that they will also add to anything discussed.
Click to expand...

How many heart transplants are yall doing per fellow per year? LVADS? last I heard the numbers were very low.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Members don't see this ad :)
dchz said:
How many heart transplants are yall doing per fellow per year? LVADS? last I heard the numbers were very low.
Click to expand...
Compared to historical numbers, it was low, 22 and 25 hearts for 2020 and 2019. The average is 16.8, that is, 3658 hearts among 217 registered centers. (OPTN database).

In 2018 CMS funding for hearts was cut, which is reinstated since Oct 2020. Reports go quarterly to OPTN, but I know last weekend there were 3 and this week 2 more. I'm on an elective, so those are the ones I know about. There is likely more.

LVAD wise, I don't think is low at all; there are always a couple of new names in the ICU list every week. Especially due to destination therapy use (no heart ttx listing, just LVAD). However, I don't have access to the Intermacs database, so I'll ask for some numbers and answer appropriately.
 
Speaking of...

I have my doubts about this current trend of everyone and their mother doing dual cardiac and ICU training. For a select few with very specific career goals it makes a ton of sense- but judging from the experiences of my current cofellows who are looking for dual jobs right now, there just aren’t that many out there. Certainly if the current trend continues, the supply of dual trained folks is likely to outpace demand. Not to mention that finishing a year of fellowship, and then realizing that you have a full additional year of fellowship, really sucks big time.

My advice for the residents is to really think hard about whether you want to do dual training. If you can’t see yourself being happy doing anything but working in a high end CTICU taking care of MCS patients, then go for it. But based on my observations and conversations with a number of dual trained ppl, in most cases you’re probably better off just picking one
 
  • Like
Reactions: 6 users
Hork Bajir said:
Speaking of...

I have my doubts about this current trend of everyone and their mother doing dual cardiac and ICU training. For a select few with very specific career goals it makes a ton of sense- but judging from the experiences of my current cofellows who are looking for dual jobs right now, there just aren’t that many out there. Certainly if the current trend continues, the supply of dual trained folks is likely to outpace demand. Not to mention that finishing a year of fellowship, and then realizing that you have a full additional year of fellowship, really sucks big time.

My advice for the residents is to really think hard about whether you want to do dual training. If you can’t see yourself being happy doing anything but working in a high end CTICU taking care of MCS patients, then go for it. But based on my observations and conversations with a number of dual trained ppl, in most cases you’re probably better off just picking one
Click to expand...
That is a great point, but there also is a large pool of applicants that choose to do duel for the competitive advantage for matching into a better cardiac program if they can stomach an year of ICU. I've noticed that people who are truly passionate about ICU end up pursuing 1 year CCM fellowship. Not saying that people who are dual trained are not passionate about ICU. I am sure many of them are.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 2 users
Licious_1 said:
Thanks for doing this? Can you give an insight into the CCM rotations, what ICUs, the faculty manning those ICUs. Thanks.
Click to expand...
Rotation = 1 month. 9 ICU rotations and 3 electives (Research, TTE, Perfusion medicine, etc). My schedule: Neuro ICU, CV surg ICU, CV mechanical support ICU, MICU, Perfusion medicine, Research, TTE, SICU, CV mechanical support ICU, CV surg ICU, Thoracic ICU, Texas Children CV mechanical support ICU.

Our fellowship is under the cardiac anesthesia division that belongs to Texas Heart. The Baylor anesthesia department works in parallel in the non-cardiac ORs. We have mostly anesthesia ccm or dual-trained attendings plus 3 pulm crits, 1 cv surgeon (only does ICU) and 1 cardiologist (also CCM trained). I like the multidisciplinary flavor.

This year the new PD Diaz-Gomez has made emphasis on ASE TTE Critical Care Echocardiography certification i.e CCeExam. He is a big proponent of US in ICU and is part of the group that wrote book and created the board certification. So we took the board exam in January and are working on getting the number of echo studies needed for certification.
 
Hork Bajir said:
Speaking of...

I have my doubts about this current trend of everyone and their mother doing dual cardiac and ICU training. For a select few with very specific career goals it makes a ton of sense- but judging from the experiences of my current cofellows who are looking for dual jobs right now, there just aren’t that many out there. Certainly if the current trend continues, the supply of dual trained folks is likely to outpace demand. Not to mention that finishing a year of fellowship, and then realizing that you have a full additional year of fellowship, really sucks big time.

My advice for the residents is to really think hard about whether you want to do dual training. If you can’t see yourself being happy doing anything but working in a high end CTICU taking care of MCS patients, then go for it. But based on my observations and conversations with a number of dual trained ppl, in most cases you’re probably better off just picking one
Click to expand...
I agree that is definitely not a convenient thing (extra training, delaying attending life, etc) and likely a poor financial decision thinking on the extra year of training. Job wise there seems to be an appetite for dual trainees for now.
 
Hork Bajir said:
Speaking of...

I have my doubts about this current trend of everyone and their mother doing dual cardiac and ICU training. For a select few with very specific career goals it makes a ton of sense- but judging from the experiences of my current cofellows who are looking for dual jobs right now, there just aren’t that many out there. Certainly if the current trend continues, the supply of dual trained folks is likely to outpace demand. Not to mention that finishing a year of fellowship, and then realizing that you have a full additional year of fellowship, really sucks big time.

My advice for the residents is to really think hard about whether you want to do dual training. If you can’t see yourself being happy doing anything but working in a high end CTICU taking care of MCS patients, then go for it. But based on my observations and conversations with a number of dual trained ppl, in most cases you’re probably better off just picking one
Click to expand...
I want to ECHO this, roping the candidate into an extra year of ICU servitude has very high opportunity costs involved for the candidate.

I've considered a dual fellowship once up on a time. I'm sure @THIFellow loves ICU as it is. But doing ICU at St. Luke does not seem fun to me. But it's easier said than done @Hork Bajir , I remember myself willing to do a year of ICU just to do hearts. Glad I didn't take that route, but let's not dismiss how hard it is to get into a decent ACTA fellowship.

THIFellow said:
Compared to historical numbers, it was low, 22 and 25 hearts for 2020 and 2019. The average is 16.8.
Click to expand...
Yeah but the average place doesn't have 8 fellows per year. 4 heart transplants per fellow is enough to realize you don't want to do it regularly!

THIFellow said:
This year the new PD Diaz-Gomez has made emphasis on ASE TTE Critical Care Echocardiography certification i.e CCeExam. He is a big proponent of US in ICU and is part of the group that wrote book and created the board certification. So we took the board exam in January and are working on getting the number of echo studies needed for certification.
Click to expand...
This is awesome. I love the initiative it's about time we picked up the TTE. Again, not to dismiss your ICU year, but one does not need to stomach the ICU year to do this. I took extra elective months in TTE during fellowship and went around and did TTEs with the techs. Was able to put an awake pt on ECMO with my TTE guidance (not a big deal, but to me it was a test of my competence). Nonetheless, this was a very valuable skill later in practice as I feel comfortable looking up the TTE images and interpreting for myself before I took them to the OR. Kudos to your PD for doing this for yall.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
Nothing recent here. Still hoping to hear from Columbia and big Boston programs...
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Looking back at my last year's emails, although the bulk of the interview invitations came in January, there were a few that came in February. My last interview invitation was on 2/28, so there still is time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Has anybody heard from the Chicago programs?
 
montefiore and cedars this week
 
I don't know anything about Monte, thought of as a good NYC program or is it one of the lower tier ones?
 
I interviewed at most programs in northeast (total overkill in retrospect). If you are interested, PM me and I would be happy to share what I thought after my interviews last year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
rolypolyoly said:
I don't know anything about Monte, thought of as a good NYC program or is it one of the lower tier ones?
Click to expand...

Talking "tiers" clouds the conversation a lot and gives some programs undue praise while unnecessarily making other programs seem worse.

How bad of a fellowship is monte? It's better in training than a program like cooper, where they don't have heart failure. You probably do more cases than one would at NYU. But they aren't going to give you 8 weeks of vacation and average a 40 hour work week. Monte does have the downside where if you're the fellow on call you might have to drive across town in the snow to relieve someone for 1 hour.

On the other hand programs like columbia has very good education and fellow lectures with the godfather of TEE himself, but it's unlikely you will do a subclavian central line by landmark there.

How much better is columbia better than monte? Probably a good amount in terms fellowship recognition, alumni network and such. But to say they are different "tiers" would be giving too much credit to Columbia, both would produce trainees that have done tons of heart failure and would be heads and shoulder above a place like cooper.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 7 users
dchz said:
Talking "tiers" clouds the conversation a lot and gives some programs undue praise while unnecessarily making other programs seem worse.

How bad of a fellowship is monte? It's better in training than a program like cooper, where they don't have heart failure. You probably do more cases than one would at NYU. But they aren't going to give you 8 weeks of vacation and average a 40 hour work week. Monte does have the downside where if you're the fellow on call you might have to drive across town in the snow to relieve someone for 1 hour.

On the other hand programs like columbia has very good education and fellow lectures with the godfather of TEE himself, but it's unlikely you will do a subclavian central line by landmark there.

How much better is columbia better than monte? Probably a good amount in terms fellowship recognition, alumni network and such. But to say they are different "tiers" would be giving too much credit to Columbia, both would produce trainees that have done tons of heart failure and would be heads and shoulder above a place like cooper.
Click to expand...

Agree the “tiers” thing is super misleading, though I’ve certainly benefited from it. Programs change a lot from year to year and decade to decade: anesthesia faculty come and go, surgeons come and go, hospital leadership changes, etc, but if you’ve noticed, the list of “top” programs has remained relatively fixed for a long time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 3 users
Brigham is a great program, but they recently lost a few surgeons and their volume is way down. I would be sure to get a sense of what kind of numbers their current fellows are posting before you rank them (of course they’re going to tell you that they’re hiring someone new, their numbers are recovering, etc.… but they told me the same thing when I interviewed there, and from what I hear the volume is still waydown. You only have one year of fellowship, don’t shoot yourself in the foot by going to a program which won’t expose you to enough cases)

Don’t get me wrong, obviously it’s a great program with world-class faculty, and a super choice if you have any ambitions of staying in academia given how connected they are to the SCA. I’m just suggesting that you really kick the tires before accepting the shiny propaganda that they’ll try to sell you
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
As March approaches, do you think programs are done sending out invites? What programs are you still waiting to hear from?
 
Anyone have thoughts on staying in your own institution vs going somewhere new for fellowship? Benefits seem to be you know the system and people and not needing to move. Cons being not learning a new way of doing things. Would be interested in other people's take on this. Pretend the geographic location not an issue in this
 
How many interviews are you all getting? Thoughts on a safe number of interviews during the COVID era?
 
I'm personally capping myself at 8-9 interviews which is probably more than enough. Given the low cost to attending a virtual interview I imagine people may be doing 1-2 more interviews than a typical year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
I was offered 12. I'm planning on attending 11, but I dont have a home program and my residency name doesn't carry much weight.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
You should go to as many interviews as possible. You never know which program will surprise you. Also, it really does not cost you money and time anymore to attend additional interview. I know a few people who felt "confident" and turned down interviews and they went unmatched. Unless you know for 100% (geographic reasons) that you would rather go unmatched than to match at the program you are thinking about cancelling, I recommend that you attend all of them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
You must log in or register to reply here.
Next unread thread

Similar threads

F
Pediatric Anesthesiology Fellowship Application 2025
Replies
8
Views
2K
SRYSPAC
S
P
SF Match for CT anesthesia fellowship
Replies
27
Views
3K
Pablo94
P
S
Pediatric Anesthesiology Fellowship Advice
Replies
3
Views
2K
SRYSPAC
S
B
Pediatric Anesthesiology Fellowship Application 2024
Replies
47
Views
9K
ambiturner
A
A
Applying late to CT fellowship vs applying in CA-3 year?
Replies
5
Views
926
DrN2O
D
Top