- Joined
- Nov 1, 2010
- Messages
- 112
- Reaction score
- 37
Thank you for voicing your opinion. Please see my previous posts.
Last edited:
Why? Let's be clear, the only rationale behind this push is to grand yourself a title as close to MD as possible. This is nothing other than a "man I wish I had an MD" circlejerk and, I suspect it is quite insulting to a number of DO students and graduates.
Thank you for voicing your opinion. Please see my previous posts.
RE: degree change
As for the LCME... the California medical association (CMA) did it without them in 1962.
Why don't you just go to an MD school if you feel the confusion is such a big deal? I hear the caribbean is taking apps. 👍
Why dont you go to a chiropractor school??? you can save your self alote of time
Specter, instead of criticizing this entire process why not join us, petition the LCME/ ACGME to accredit DO schools & education, thus standardizing clinical rotations to a level that you find savory. Why not agree to that?
Bc i think DCs are the debil. And im going to be happy w my MD degree![]()
Why? Let's be clear, the only rationale behind this push is to grand yourself a title as close to MD as possible. This is nothing other than a "man I wish I had an MD" circlejerk and, I suspect it is quite insulting to a number of DO students and graduates.
You know for an "MD medical student" you spend an awful lot of time on SDN, especially in the Pre-Osteo or Osteo forums just digging your nose trying to spark controversies, debates, pick on people without cause, or simply just troll.
I mean, shouldn't you be studying for exams left n right? You're one of the few "medical students" that I have seen who spend so much time online just wasting about - making an ass outta yourself.
![]()
Spectre... shouldn't you be busy eating skiiers at the bottom of the slope?
spec ur MD?
dude...how do you EVEN HAVE TIME TO TROLL the DO forums?! im shocked!
i cannot find time to look at the MD side...
are you even in med school braaaa?or you just have great time management?
looks like with that many posts...your should be pre-med-ing it
...you must be sad and lonely that youd come here on yor free time
need a hug buddy?
This. People seem to think offering a degree is as simple as changing the letters on the diploma. It isn't. Medical licensure in the USA is governed by federal and state statutory law, which names specific bodies as recognized to accredit degrees of various types. Should DO schools start offering a "dual degree", the MD portion would be worthless without changing the law books. Or worse, if the degree is not "dual" but a single degree named "MD.DO.", the entirety of the degree may not be recognized and graduates of said schools would not be eligible for license anywhere. This fantasy of "oh well we can just change the name!" is transparent and ignorant.
I didn't see anything in his post that indicated he didn't read the other.
Bazinga!
I like this kid 😀
So if this argument is correct, I wonder how those ignorant dentists, at now nearly half of all dental schools and growing, were able to make the transparent and ignorant fantasy of changing from DDS to DMD a reality. Oh and to think the monumental mountains all of those schools must have moved !! Impossible!!
drip drip drip.... what's that I hear.... oh I do say, I believe its the sound of leaky logic!
BTW I too find it interesting that as an MD student you seem to stand out as the most outspoken in opposition.
Because the degrees are synonymous in the law books (as opposed to "equal" ). As I would hope you know as a DO resident, the laws do not treat MD and DO synonymously or even equally in all areas even if they are equal in terms of scope of practice.
I'm also not aware of them changing degrees in dentistry. the DDS/DMD thing is more of a heritage issue of some schools requiring their degrees to be Greek (or something). The degrees are not two distinct degrees that drifted together as is the case with MD and DO.
Sent from my DROID RAZR using SDN Mobile
make an effort not to partition, exclude, or otherwise look down on anyone.
I gotta say, though, I do appreciate the "Shouldn't you be _______" statements. You seem blissfully unaware of how hard you prove my point with such statements. 👍........👎
spec ur MD?
dude...how do you EVEN HAVE TIME TO TROLL the DO forums?! im shocked!
i cannot find time to look at the MD side...
are you even in med school braaaa?or you just have great time management?
looks like with that many posts...your should be pre-med-ing it
...you must be sad and lonely that youd come here on yor free time
need a hug buddy?
Aside from a rather disjointed response, I must say that you have made an effort to condescend upon a lot of people. Regardless of what information travels to what machine, the point is you spend quite a decent (for a lack of better word) trolling SDN in general in comparison to many busy medical students trying to study many many hours to stay on top of their performance as opposed to prioritizing on SDN.
If we add up how long it takes you to lurk to the forums, and post as much as you do, read plenty of responses in a week - its probably a very large number, again, relative to the average medical student.
And yes, you do spend a disproportionate amount in the Pre-DO forum just...again...trolling about -- which I'm not sure what kind of news and updates you get from it being an "allopathic medical student" - besides a good amount of internal chuckle by provoking and trolling on whoever you find that can fall into your troll-trap.
I mean I'm sure you get along with other students, despite how many medical students on SDN (15+) have told me via message that they have told plenty of premedical students to be wary of you, since your behavior on SDN (for the majority of the time-- emphasis on majority) is rather counter-productive, but what do I know right?
Lastly, only people with delicate egos do what you do. It's pretty Psych 101.
Spectre... shouldn't you be busy eating skiiers at the bottom of the slope?
![]()
I do understand your argument... though remain dubious to it's validity - see below. But I was speaking about a degree change ( to MDO) as opposed to adding the MD degree to the DO. You'll see in my previous post that I recognize the difference in level of complexity of these changes.
However, the change to MD is not impossible as California showed us in 1962. I understand that your argument is that the degree is void outside of the state... I do not know that this is true, more specifically that a DO who changed to an MD in one state now is revoked from practicing as a DO in other states that do not recognize the change from DO to MD. However, if even if that were the case, so be it... many changes happen state by state. The point is this was once done. I have met one of these former DO's and he still practices as an MD surgeon in California. It is not impossible.
Lol this cracked me up.
In all reality, though, I like reading Spectre's posts as I appreciate the blunt honesty that too many lack on here.
Awwwww sadface 🙁This message is hidden because OncoMD is on your ignore list.
Awwwww sadface 🙁
1) "too complicated for you" does not equal disjointed. Many others follow my posts with minimal effort. Yes, this was intentionally condescending.
2) you have no idea what in required of someone in medical school so the point here is moot. At the very least I can take your statements regarding my time spent, compare to my own (and personal) level of academic success, and feel quite good about myself
3) I get PMs too. I don't care who told you what, to he honest. You last line is actually incredibly ironic.
4) please address my points rather than appealing to some phantom sense of the greater SDN opinion on the matter. I don't arbitrarily condescend towards people. It happens specifically when someone arrogantly spouts off toward someone else without knowing what they are talking about. I have enough people (both MD and DO) who have backed me in my statements that I care exceedingly little about your opinion of me or that of those who have apparently PMed you. The point is to address the topic and not your meaningless personal opinions 🙂.
Sent from my DROID RAZR using SDN Mobile
Wait... we have argued before, haven't we?now this makes sense. Psych 101 indeed. Consider yourself ignored. Your fun-filled opinions last time were nothing but hyped up "DO = MD+" based on nothing other than your own need to stroke your ego.
Good lord, way to hold a grudge, chickiepoo. That was months ago. Apparently you haven't learned anything either.
Sent from my DROID RAZR using SDN Mobile
Don't be sad pumpkin! This is what was said.
Awwww...did I strike a nerve? 😛
1. Haha, "too complicated for you" is so subjective. It was disjointed, but very easy-to-read -- not really, I'm not joking lol. Attempt to condescend all you want, it really doesn't bother me the least bit 😛
2. You're very right. I have no 1st person experiences (yet) of what's required for medical school, but nonetheless, PLENTY of medical students have agreed with my logic, and therefore adding validity to my statements - so...I guess not so moot huh? 😎
Oh I'm sure you are academic success, no doubt. I guess it depends what each individual considers success based on their own set standards..some lower than others
3. Don't care you say? Suuuuure you don't
4. You do arbitrarily condescend. You've done it to me in the past, and I used to be probably one of the most passive people on SDN. You've done it to plenty others - and many medical and pre-medical and I think like 2 residents? have told me the same thing.
Everyone knows you're a FAKE medical student probably typing away in mommy's basement...socially awkward...no friends...maybe that's why you are on SDN so much, so you can compensate for what you don't have in real life.
I do have single female friends (and male too if you're into that sort of thing). Let me know. I'll give you my e-mail and set something up! Someone's gotta get you back into the real world, so you don't end up wasting your life on SDN.
LOL, you make no sense. What ego? I'm extremely humble and down to earth. We have argued before, because you've tried to troll me and I (unknowingly) fed into your troll-trap.
The only one who has an ego is you. Otherwise, you wouldn't have the need to continuously spark arguments to try to come up on top...oh wait, that's more like insecurities.
I don't hold any grudges for online personalities lol. It's just sad how people still debate with you when that's all you feed off of...debates and arguments. Apparently, your opinion is...your opinion and highly innaccurate
Like I said, let me know if you want a date with one of my friends in real life. You need one.
You'll be on the ignore list too right now....hugs!!!![]()
Today, 06:16 PM
Remove user from ignore list
SpecterGT260
This message is hidden because SpecterGT260 is on your ignore list.
Super heartbroken 🙁
^^^^ this on topic thing, let's talk about this.The way I understand it, the DOs in Cali were not eligible to practice in any capacity outside of the state. I could be wrong, but this is what I understand of the situation. In the laws, the degrees "DO" and "MD" are stated explicitly with regards to requirements. A new degree "MDO" would require the laws be rewritten. Hell, it may even be that changing the case from DO to dO or something silly would require a re-write. I don't know, and with the way the law works, typically nobody knows for sure until there is a ruling on something like that. But as for now my understanding is that there is precedent to state that changing the degree name would result in revocation of rights until the laws are updated. Ergo, this is not a simple matter of "we should change it" - which was my original point.
I am an MD student.
The DO degree will never be changed to MD. Why? The AACOM is interested in still existing and maintaining control of its member schools. Go back and read a book called "The DOs" by Norman Gevitz. The AMA has repeatedly tried to coopt DO schools, to bring them under the umbrella of the LCME so we can all be MDs.
Yet despite the efforts of the AMA over the years, DOs want their indepedence. They want to still teach OMM and maintain that they are a distinct group from their "allopathic" counterparts.
It is a control issue and a branding issue. It will never happen. And it's too bad IMO.
Honestly, I feel the current administration are mostly headstrong who are proud and stuck in their tradition.
I do predict a change in the degree, as the lines do continued to be blurried and less DOs are continuing to practice OMT (according to statistics).
I don't believe it will start off with an outright change to MD, BUT, there will definitely be an "M" incorporated into the degree initials. It probably won't happen until more....contemporary physicians and staff members take over the majority of the AOA and decide it's beneficial to combine institutions beyond the initial residency merger.
They gotta start somewhere right?
The problem is that the people who are "elected" into AOA positions are the OMT cronies that believe the same thing as the old guard. There is little chance of an honest election where regular DOs are elected into AOA positions. From what I understand they pretty much appoint their replacements. Correct me if I am wrong as this is what I keep hearing through the grapevine.
Falstaff from Henry IV Part I said:To die is to be a counterfeit, for he is but the counterfeit of
a man who hath not the life of a man; but to counterfeit dying,
when a man thereby liveth, is to be no counterfeit, but the true
and perfect image of life indeed. The better part of valor is
discretion, in the which better part I have sav'd my life.
The problem is that the people who are "elected" into AOA positions are the OMT cronies that believe the same thing as the old guard. There is little chance of an honest election where regular DOs are elected into AOA positions. From what I understand they pretty much appoint their replacements. Correct me if I am wrong as this is what I keep hearing through the grapevine.
The problem is that the people who are "elected" into AOA positions are the OMT cronies that believe the same thing as the old guard. There is little chance of an honest election where regular DOs are elected into AOA positions. From what I understand they pretty much appoint their replacements. Correct me if I am wrong as this is what I keep hearing through the grapevine.
I don't think the "M" means much, if anything at all, to physicians. Sure, it may be a problem with the way the AOA upper echelon is picked, but even if that were changed, do you want the people pining over an "M" in charge?![]()
Actually, thats what I heard in the past too. The ONLY problem I have with being a DO are the questionable decisions with handling the MD vs DO issues by leadership of the AOA.
I think that if more contemporary DOs became more active in the "political" aspect of their career, we would be able to make better changes for ourselves and future generations.
I'm still VERY surprised they got a residency merger...it shows that there might be hope.
Using analogy, there have been civil issues that we thought we could not achieve based on the active country government we had at the time, and we were able to make progress, so I'm sure we can within the medical area. I'm optimistic.
If I were to pick initials, I would get MD, OS. (Medical Doctor degree, Osteopathic Science degree) or OS, MD. Whichever order lol
FYI Onco nothing has been carved in stone. It's an ongoing proposal. They still need to formulate a Memorandum of Understanding. Be on the lookout for news this May-July.
It would be a disservice to let it fall through the cracks. Still, there are supposedly whispers of concern regarding the stability of the DO degree and ultimately the DO profession.
Neuro! Haven't seen you around much! How's med school going for you this semester? I finally apply this year, woop woop!
There IS an official proposal being worked on in regards to changing the initials? I'm confused by the way you worded your response.
They didn't "get" a residency merger. They were essentially sucked up by the ACGME or else DOs completing an AOA residency would not be allowed into MD fellowships. They basically had no choice and are trying to save face by attempting to make it look like the AOAs idea.
Naww I don't really care about a name change. I think it is ridiculous to be honest. Just pointing out my impression of how the AOA elects people to replace them and how I do not for a second believe they will improve.
I don't want to derail here but try to stay with me here...I rotated with a family practice guy that does OMM. On the 2nd day we had some pt's that were there specifically for OMM adjustments. Fine. First pt comes in and we do some routine ME and HVLA, and then at the end, he does this weird thing to the pt's head: He forms make-believe guns with both his hands by extending his 2nd and 3rd digit and clenching with his 1st, 4th and 5th. He then suspends both hands about 3 inches off the person's head on the posterior aspect, and points them inward toward the center of his head and just holds it there for a couple minutes. He then proceeds to tell me that this is a very powerful technique and not to attempt it with proper supervision. We were not taught this 'technique' in the first two years, and granted we got a bunch of BS with 'conventional' cranial but this takes it to the next level of insanity. Anyone else witness this kind of crap?
Bones delivers such a meaty story for discussion and it gets ignored because everyone else on this thread is arguing over why the other people on this thread are here and over what they said they said and whether they deserve to be here or not.
I for one would be fascinated to know if Bones' experience has been had by other students as well.