D4 with 350K D-school Loans + Endo debt

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
I’m an endodontist. Worked for a bit before going back for endo. Also had to pay for residency training and finished with about 500k in total loans. Worth it and would do it all over again.
How possible is it to know you wanna specialize in endo straight out of school? Or would you recommend in most cases going to work first? Personally, I just can’t understand how someone who’s spent such little time in dental school doing a specific procedure can know they wanna do that the rest of their life, but maybe I’m missing something?

Members don't see this ad.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
How possible is it to know you wanna specialize in endo straight out of school? Or would you recommend in most cases going to work first? Personally, I just can’t understand how someone who’s spent such little time in dental school doing a specific procedure can know they wanna do that the rest of their life, but maybe I’m missing something?
I suppose the same could be said of any dental specialty.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 users
Members don't see this ad :)
How possible is it to know you wanna specialize in endo straight out of school? Or would you recommend in most cases going to work first? Personally, I just can’t understand how someone who’s spent such little time in dental school doing a specific procedure can know they wanna do that the rest of their life, but maybe I’m missing something?
I could be wrong but I thought most endo programs want a few years of experience as a GP.
 
I could be wrong but I thought most endo programs want a few years of experience as a GP.
You're not wrong. Most programs do, but there are a few that take applicants right out of school.
 
I'd do it. Hustle for a few years in the beginning to make a dent in the loans if they scare, and then plan from there how you want your future in practice to look.

Being a specialist means you can produce more in the same amount of time as an average GP. So you can work less. Or work more and make more.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Sorry if this is a silly question, but would everyone pushing for Endo residency feel the same about other sought-after 2-3 ye residencies like Peds/Perio? Is the golden rule generally speciality training = worth it financially?
There's no black or white answer. As with a lot of things in dentistry it varies. You could have made more as a GP or more as a perio. There is no clear cut answer.
 
Sorry if this is a silly question, but would everyone pushing for Endo residency feel the same about other sought-after 2-3 ye residencies like Peds/Perio? Is the golden rule generally speciality training = worth it financially?
not always. There are limits. For example, I wouldn’t spend a million dollars to become any one of them because you don’t know what life will bring your way.
 
not always. There are limits. For example, I wouldn’t spend a million dollars to become any one of them because you don’t know what life will bring your way.
Don’t forget that although statistically the past has shown that specialists on average make more than GPs. There are still GPs today that make more than specialists and we don’t know what the future will look like. Increased student debt burden is incentivizing GPs to refer less of their manageable endo, OS, and ortho. Maybe one of the older dentists here could chime in, but it is my impression that the average dentist today does more endo, OS, and ortho than dentists of the past?

The main point I'm trying to make is if you specialize don't look at it as a golden ticket to a future of less work and more money. Which I commonly hear other students voicing thats what specalizing does for you. It may be true in some cases I just wouldn't count on it always being true in every case.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Don’t forget that although statistically the past has shown that specialists on average make more than GPs. There are still GPs today that make more than specialists and we don’t know what the future will look like. Increased student debt burden is incentivizing GPs to refer less of their manageable endo, OS, and ortho. Maybe one of the older dentists here could chime in, but it is my impression that the average dentist today does more endo, OS, and ortho than dentists of the past?

The main point I'm trying to make is if you specialize don't look at it as a golden ticket to a future of less work and more money. Which I commonly hear other students voicing thats what specalizing does for you. It may be true in some cases I just wouldn't count on it always being true in every case.

In general, GPs make much less than specialists. When you compare per hour worked, it’s not even close.

The main reason is that the specialist (OS/endo/perio) gets rid of the comp exam and is scheduling pre-qualified leads (these are people who have consulted with a GP, understand the costs, and are more than likely ready to proceed with treatment). The process of lead capture, screening, and converting these leads is orders of magnitude better for OS, endo, and perio in comparison to the GP.

Endo as a GP sucks…you get paid half of what an Endodontist is paid by insurance and you have to juggle your hygiene schedule at the same time. Because your frequency of endo is so much lower than an Endodontist, your teams ability to setup the room efficiently for endo is never great.

Ortho as a GP isn’t as great or as profitable as it sounds. Most of us are doing clear aligners. But fees are huge. The money is in brackets which are cheap and predictable. The setup of a GP practice with hygiene checks and closed ops and long procedure times makes Ortho not that profitable. Ortho is about delegating and volume, which is hard to incorporate into a 4 or 5 chair practice (ortho friends of mine work out of 8 chairs without breaking a sweat).

Being a “super” dentist is overrated and a marketing buzzword to sell CE courses. Efficiency and predictability is the name of the game IMO.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 9 users
Endo as a GP sucks…you get paid half of what an Endodontist is paid by insurance and you have to juggle your hygiene schedule at the same time. Because your frequency of endo is so much lower than an Endodontist, your teams ability to setup the room efficiently for endo is never great.
I’ll have to disagree with you. I do the majority of my own endo to include molars and retreats. Firstly, I will absolutely refer a very difficult case to the specialist because it is what is best for the patient and for me. Tortuous, calcified canals, not for me. If I feel it’s something that I can do then I go ahead and do the nsrct myself. But I get paid more because I’m prepping the crown and doing the core and post (if necessary) at the same time. Specialist does get reimbursed more, but it’s not double.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Members don't see this ad :)
I’ll have to disagree with you. I do the majority of my own endo to include molars and retreats. Firstly, I will absolutely refer a very difficult case to the specialist because it is what is best for the patient and for me. Tortuous, calcified canals, not for me. If I feel it’s something that I can do then I go ahead and do the nsrct myself. But I get paid more because I’m prepping the crown and doing the core and post (if necessary) at the same time. Specialist does get reimbursed more, but it’s not double.
Endodontists in town must love seeing your name pop up on the referral pad. Hopefully you are retreating cases with CBCT, microscope and a clear diagnostic understanding of why they initially failed.
 
Endodontists in town must love seeing your name pop up on the referral pad. Hopefully you are retreating cases with CBCT, microscope and a clear diagnostic understanding of why they initially failed.
they aren’t seeing any of my failed re-treats, because they aren’t failing. Like I said, case selection. It’s not that hard to diagnose a single canal that is barely halfway obturated. They are seeing the cases that I know I have no business touching in the first place.

Specialists take note, this is how you lose referrals and $$$.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 users
they aren’t seeing any of my failed re-treats, because they aren’t failing. Like I said, case selection. It’s not that hard to diagnose a single canal that is barely halfway obturated. They are seeing the cases that I know I have no business touching in the first place.

Specialists take note, this is how you lose referrals and $$$.

Yes, specialists do take note. You DO NOT want a referral who manages most their own Endo and retreats and only refers to you a case a month of a tooth that is “too difficult for them”. That’s NOT how you make money.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Yes, specialists do take note. You DO NOT want a referral who manages most their own Endo and retreats and only refers to you a case a month of a tooth that is “too difficult for them”. That’s NOT how you make money.
But isn't that the job of the specialist to take the cases that the GP isn't comfortable doing?

If the GP is competent and can successfully manage most of their own endo then they are doing what is best for the patient by not having them pay the increased cost that a specialist would demand while still providing the quality of care within their scope. Especially since cost is the number one reason that people delay or decline dental care.

It's the concept of quality vs cost vs access in healthcare. As one of those three becomes more favorable to the public the other two inevitably become less favorable. It's a balance that is always shifting, but a this current time with the premise of dental therapists on the rise I'd argue that the shift is trending towards decreasing costs. Remember that we aren't serving ourselves, but our patients and we gotta find the right balance in dental care to keep the patients cared for.
 
Last edited:
But isn't that the job of the specialist to take the cases that the GP isn't comfortable doing?

Absolutely and to an extent. GP’s do and should a ton of Endo. We all know that and support it. I help my referrals with cases all the time. But no specialist is going to develop a good working relationship with a GP who only refers really hard stuff. We don’t owe them anything nor do they owe us anything. We’ll always get the patient scheduled and treat them. But we won’t rush their patients in or stay late to see them, which is how you make money and build referalls. It’ll be “we’re booked 2-3 weeks out, when can you come in?” And sure you could lose the referral that way, but my point is, we won’t really care.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
If the GP is competent and can successfully manage most of their own endo then they are doing what is best for the patient by not having them pay the increased cost that a specialist would demand while still providing the quality of care within their scope. Especially since cost is the number one reason that people delay or decline dental care.

It's the concept of quality vs cost vs access in healthcare. As one of those three becomes more favorable to the public the other two inevitably become less favorable. It's a balance that is always shifting, but a this current time with the premise of dental therapists on the rise I'd argue that the shift is trending towards decreasing costs. Remember that we aren't serving ourselves, but our patients and we gotta find the right balance in dental care to keep the patients cared for.
I don’t disagree with any of that. I would add that any treatment carried out by a GP should be done so with the same quality of care that a specialist would provide. Regardless of price. But sure, there’s a balancing act and we play the game.

We are also shifting to the decreased cost model. Younger Endo’s take most insurances because like you said, it is driving treatment decisions. So again, we are busy enough to prioritize referrals. And that’s just my whole point. And any specialists would agree. We all have referrals who only send garbage and we’ll do it the absolute best we can. But we would never care about losing the referral.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
But no specialist is going to develop a good working relationship with a GP who only refers really hard stuff.
So you became a specialist that doesn’t want to do hard cases? You want the GP to just send you an easy case they can do themselves? Sure, I guess I could send the nonrestorable maxillary 2nd premolar with significant bone loss and mobility to OS because it’s easy and I want to cut them a break.

Let’s think about this medically. Does a primary care doc send a simple cold to an ENT or pulmonologist when they can manage it themselves? Sounds silly?

It’ll be “we’re booked 2-3 weeks out, when can you come in?”
Ah so you lie to the patient that’s in pain and willing to pay you to spite the referring GP. Tell us all again how to make money. Did you forget that GP’s refer other GP’s to specialists?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
So you became a specialist that doesn’t want to do hard cases? You want the GP to just send you an easy case they can do themselves? Sure, I guess I could send the nonrestorable maxillary 2nd premolar with significant bone loss and mobility to OS because it’s easy and I want to cut them a break.

Let’s think about this medically. Does a primary care doc send a simple cold to an ENT or pulmonologist when they can manage it themselves? Sounds silly?


Ah so you lie to the patient that’s in pain and willing to pay you to spite the referring GP. Tell us all again how to make money. Did you forget that GP’s refer other GP’s to specialists?
I get what he is saying, basically he prefers to work with the GPs that refer the majority of their endo so he is willing to bend over backwards to keep those types of GPs referring to him, but if it's a GP that only refers really hard cases then he will still see their referrals, but isn't going to go above and beyond to keep that GP happy. Not ideal, but definitely understandable imo.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 users
So you became a specialist that doesn’t want to do hard cases? You want the GP to just send you an easy case they can do themselves? Sure, I guess I could send the nonrestorable maxillary 2nd premolar with significant bone loss and mobility to OS because it’s easy and I want to cut them a break.

Let’s think about this medically. Does a primary care doc send a simple cold to an ENT or pulmonologist when they can manage it themselves? Sounds silly?


Ah so you lie to the patient that’s in pain and willing to pay you to spite the referring GP. Tell us all again how to make money. Did you forget that GP’s refer other GP’s to specialists?
No we really are booked out that much. And your OS analogy and medical analogy don’t line up. We don’t expect easy cases. We just don’t ONLY want the “extremely tough cases” someone as qualified as yourself can’t handle. Which it sounds like you only send. And we have the ability to choose which referrals we prioritize just as you can prioritize which specialist you use. Plenty of GP’s refer all their Endo. And we take them out, on trips, shower them with gifts, etc. So I’m just telling you, you are not the type of GP we like to work with. Any Endodontist you use will never tell you and of course we will always do our best on your patient and would even squeeze them in if they are in pain. Because that’s what we do. I’m just telling you the side of it you’ll never here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
No we really are booked out that much. And your OS analogy and medical analogy don’t line up. We don’t expect easy cases. We just don’t ONLY want the “extremely tough cases” someone as qualified as yourself can’t handle. Which it sounds like you only send. And we have the ability to choose which referrals we prioritize just as you can prioritize which specialist you use. Plenty of GP’s refer all their Endo. And we take them out, on trips, shower them with gifts, etc. So I’m just telling you, you are not the type of GP we like to work with. Any Endodontist you use will never tell you and of course we will always do our best on your patient and would even squeeze them in if they are in pain. Because that’s what we do. I’m just telling you the side of it you’ll never here.
Fair enough. As long as the patient and the docs are all happy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Don’t forget that although statistically the past has shown that specialists on average make more than GPs. There are still GPs today that make more than specialists and we don’t know what the future will look like. Increased student debt burden is incentivizing GPs to refer less of their manageable endo, OS, and ortho. Maybe one of the older dentists here could chime in, but it is my impression that the average dentist today does more endo, OS, and ortho than dentists of the past?

The main point I'm trying to make is if you specialize don't look at it as a golden ticket to a future of less work and more money. Which I commonly hear other students voicing thats what specalizing does for you. It may be true in some cases I just wouldn't count on it always being true in every case.

When I was still in dental school, I used to think that dentists were doing more procedures nowadays, and the need for specialists was dying out due to the abundance of CE. Now I actually think that the pay gap between GP and specialist is increasing not decreasing. Talk to all the old dentists around you and ask them about their dental school experiences. They all seemed to do more root canals and surgical extractions than current dental school students do fillings. Their number of apical surgeries are in line with RCT’s performed by todays grads. Today, dentists are taught how to be safe and avoid litigation leading to less venturing into the realms of specialty procedures. Insurance and DSO’s are also incentivizing a model that utilizes specialists more frequently than the past.
The GPs that are making the most money, generally are not doing so out of their own production. It is usually due to multiple practice ownership, which is just as accessible to specialists.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 users
When I was still in dental school, I used to think that dentists were doing more procedures nowadays, and the need for specialists was dying out due to the abundance of CE. Now I actually think that the pay gap between GP and specialist is increasing not decreasing. Talk to all the old dentists around you and ask them about their dental school experiences. They all seemed to do more root canals and surgical extractions than current dental school students do fillings. Their number of apical surgeries are in line with RCT’s performed by todays grads. Today, dentists are taught how to be safe and avoid litigation leading to less venturing into the realms of specialty procedures. Insurance and DSO’s are also incentivizing a model that utilizes specialists more frequently than the past.
The GPs that are making the most money, generally are not doing so out of their own production. It is usually due to multiple practice ownership, which is just as accessible to specialists.
Sorry. Off topic, but ......
I see the opposite happening. What I see is more and more in debt new grads and dentists with DS, practice debt feeling the pressure to not refer anything out of their practice. That's just revenue leaving your office. Look at all the posts here re: young soon to be dentists wanting to know if programs teach aligners, implants, molar endos, surgical extractions, etc.

As for the discussion above re: @schmoob and @FutureDent020 . That's a nice example of what each side feels and thinks regarding dental procedures being triaged and referred by the GP. The politics of referrals is a whole other discussion. What I can say is when a specialist is busy. Has plenty of referral sources ... they can be picky about who they work with. That is a LUXURY. In a saturated area ... if a GP does not like how a specialist handled a situation (or vise versa) ... there will be a line of hungry specialists ready to pounce on a possible new referral source. That's REALITY. Like it or not.

True story. I'm good friends with my primary care MD. I went to see him regarding a small benign cyst on my chest. He felt confident he could excise the cyst. As he got into the cyst ... he realized that the cyst was larger than he thought. He sutured the area up and gave me a referral to see a dermatologist. My friend had good intentions, but would I have been better served if I was referred to the Derm originally? That's the issue. The GPs have the ethical responsibility to triage their patients and decide whether they or a referral to a specialist is best for the patient.
A GP has to make this decision AFTER they have spent money (marketing, paying staff, office overhead, Dr. time, etc, etc,) to see this patient. And now they are going to send this patient (revenue) to a specialist? It's a tough balancing act for the GP. Specialists do not have to make these triage decisions.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 users
I’ve seen about 4-5 types of GP’s when it comes to endo so far. 1) Our typical referral does their own anteriors, most their premolars unless with a bridge or obvious difficult anatomy, and then refers most molars especially if crowned. 2) a couple practices send everything (about 3). 3) The practice or 2 in proximity who do all their own endo and send ones they started and realized they couldn’t do or ones that are obviously very complicated. 4) The young (usually) male dentists in DSO who try and do everything and screw up a lot. Refer when file breaks or they perforate. This is a problem and they obviously are trying to keep everything in house for production. We see a lot of pissed off patients from them. 5) A referral from someone we have never heard of because new dentists are popping up everyday. It’s wild.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Could someone get in on this action if they sent out their pulpotomies on primary teeth? Asking for a friend...

Big Hoss
Man, kids are the one population that a lot of Endo’s don’t budge on. I see them as the young and hungry guy, but some of older endodontists in my area cut it off at like 16. But I’ll take you to dinner and shower you with gifts if you promise to do your own pulpal treatments and never mention my name.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: 2 users
I'm a 2019 grad and so far from what I have observed from my former classmates is that everyone is so focused on implants that no one seems to care about learning endo. I think thats good for us (I start residency this summer) because I think newer dentists are referring endos more than we think.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Man, kids are the one population that a lot of Endo’s don’t budge on. I see them as the young and hungry guy, but some of older endodontists in my area cut it off at like 16. But I’ll take you to dinner and shower you with gifts if you promise to do your own pulpal treatments and never mention my name.

I finally experienced this. Have a 10 year old that needs a consult and probably treatment of #8 & 9 from a fall when the kid was younger. Neither the pediatric dentist nor myself knew where to send him so I made some calls. First office (established group closer to me) said no one under 14. Next one (group closer to patient) said no one under 12. Third one (solo doctor) said yes. I had no idea Endo did this! Seems like an easy startup plan - market yourself as a "pediatric endodontist" to the moms in addition to the cookies and business cards routine and soon you'll be busy enough treating their parents and grandparents.
 
Seems like an easy startup plan - market yourself as a "pediatric endodontist" to the moms in addition to the cookies and business cards routine and soon you'll be busy enough treating their parents and grandparents.
I’m aware of a dental school that’s looked into starting a 1-year endo fellowship for pediatric dentists because it’s so hard to find endos willing to see kids.

Big Hoss
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
I’m aware of a dental school that’s looked into starting a 1-year endo fellowship for pediatric dentists because it’s so hard to find endos willing to see kids.

Big Hoss
There a couple a dual endo-pediatric specialists out there. Honestly, I think that's a pretty smart set up. You can have a really good niche market. If I could manage kids better, I'd be all for that. Pulp chambers are large and you'd be doing a bunch of primary root canals instead of retreats and calcified canals. But then again you'd probably be doing more regenerations and things like that, which don't pay well at all. Still though, I think it's a pretty good setup if you can manage kids.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
There are definitely kids that need it but the problem is reimbursement is so low and usually it’s multiple visits for regen/trauma cases so private practice won’t want to do them. And just like with GP’s some endos are good and comfortable with kids and some are not.

Endo procedures on kids are usually less mechanically/technique difficult and more patient management issues. Would rather they make more CE for regeneration and vital pulp therapy (MTA pulpotomy or pulp cap of permanent teeth) aimed at pediatric dentists.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
When I was still in dental school, I used to think that dentists were doing more procedures nowadays, and the need for specialists was dying out due to the abundance of CE. Now I actually think that the pay gap between GP and specialist is increasing not decreasing. Talk to all the old dentists around you and ask them about their dental school experiences. They all seemed to do more root canals and surgical extractions than current dental school students do fillings. Their number of apical surgeries are in line with RCT’s performed by todays grads. Today, dentists are taught how to be safe and avoid litigation leading to less venturing into the realms of specialty procedures. Insurance and DSO’s are also incentivizing a model that utilizes specialists more frequently than the past.
The GPs that are making the most money, generally are not doing so out of their own production. It is usually due to multiple practice ownership, which is just as accessible to specialists.

This all depends - my fourth year of school I did 13 endos 3 molars and over 200 exo's being like maybe 30 or so surgical exos and tori removal. The thing is at the end of the day people will do what they want. I do a lot of endo but know my limitations. Where I am at GPs are starting at $180-$200k for new grads but we are in an inflation period. There is money wherever you find it. However if you do something for the money, then in my humble experience, it is very hard to try and excel at it (just my experience since I did something like that before). But we always have to give patient the options of seeing specialists; it is our duty as their general provider to tell them all of their options.

Disclosure I am in a rural area so take it for what it is worth. Closest endodontist to my office is like 1 hour away.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
I’ll have to disagree with you. I do the majority of my own endo to include molars and retreats. Firstly, I will absolutely refer a very difficult case to the specialist because it is what is best for the patient and for me. Tortuous, calcified canals, not for me. If I feel it’s something that I can do then I go ahead and do the nsrct myself. But I get paid more because I’m prepping the crown and doing the core and post (if necessary) at the same time. Specialist does get reimbursed more, but it’s not double.

I wasn’t clear and was comparing apples and oranges, but I believe you’re looking at this incorrectly when you say you’re making more than the endo and I’ll explain.

For the most part general dentists are in network. Most endos I interact with are out of network and all the endos we refer to are out of network. Their fees for initial treatment of a molar are around $1700.

Our network fees are around $900, but go as low as $680 for a molar. Even if you add the crown and the endo and the core build up, you’e just starting to pass the fee for the single molar. For RCT/core/crown you should probably be scheduling 120 minutes of chair time, saddled by 1 or 2 hygiene checks (which pay so little)…even then that’s pushing it for most general dentists who schedule 90 minutes of chair time for a core/crown.

For clarification chair time = the time the patient checks in to the time they walk out the door. The amount of time a dentist spends in the op, is much less…except for endo where you need good chunk of uninterrupted time with the tooth.

So…if you schedule 2 hours to do endo/crown what is an Endodontist doing during those 2 hours? Either 2 endos (anterior/premolar/easy molar), or a harder endo (difficult molar or retreat or surgery) + 2 consults - both of which will exceed the production of the GP.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
DO the endo. I finally got into endo after three years. being a GP sucks. Thankfully I got into a paid endo though (400k debt from DS)
Anything in particular you did from the first time applying to the third time that you think made the difference??
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Anything in particular you did from the first time applying to the third time that you think made the difference??
experience, and what i heard from someone else: "make your resume scream endo", however you wish to do that
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Top