- Joined
- May 30, 2019
- Messages
- 311
- Reaction score
- 387
- Points
- 1,541
- Pre-Medical
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
Hi all, I was hoping for some thoughts on secondary topics for diversity and adversity. I've been brainstorming for a few weeks while waiting to get verified and now that secondaries are coming in I'm getting a bit anxious. Anyway, topics below, and the adversity one gets somewhat personal so I'll try to be vague -
1) Diversity / Adversity - Born in a third world country (mixed race - ORM/URM), raised in US where I was able to gain citizenship, lived in a predominantly white area. Like many others who have posted in the forum have said, felt some need to conform which lead to a split in cultural identity. At home in the US I felt I had to conform, and during trips back to my birth country also felt somewhat left out because I was a 'cousin from the states'.
2) Adversity - Father diagnosed with terminal illness during college, required a caretaker so constantly returned home so my mom could work weekends (he was the breadwinner) which affected academic performance negatively, and due to the requirement of a caretaker have relied on paid employment to support my family/get clinical hours
Regarding #1, is it okay to talk about in the same secondary for both diversity and adversity, or is it something best kept for either adversity or diversity? The subject can be evaluated from two different angles for adversity and diversity but is it best to avoid rehashing?
And for #2, would this be a stronger topic for adversity? I also wrote about this in my PS and its influence on 'Why Medicine?' and would like to avoid rehashing though this is for a different perspective. I know the general consensus is that the people who look at the secondary aren't always the people who look at the primary/PS, so wanted more thoughts on repeating this.
Edit: Another question I had regarding secondaries. For the very, very open question of "Is there anything else you'd like the adcom to know?" - Is there any consensus on what to include in this or just leave it blank to avoid making up a BS answer?
1) Diversity / Adversity - Born in a third world country (mixed race - ORM/URM), raised in US where I was able to gain citizenship, lived in a predominantly white area. Like many others who have posted in the forum have said, felt some need to conform which lead to a split in cultural identity. At home in the US I felt I had to conform, and during trips back to my birth country also felt somewhat left out because I was a 'cousin from the states'.
2) Adversity - Father diagnosed with terminal illness during college, required a caretaker so constantly returned home so my mom could work weekends (he was the breadwinner) which affected academic performance negatively, and due to the requirement of a caretaker have relied on paid employment to support my family/get clinical hours
Regarding #1, is it okay to talk about in the same secondary for both diversity and adversity, or is it something best kept for either adversity or diversity? The subject can be evaluated from two different angles for adversity and diversity but is it best to avoid rehashing?
And for #2, would this be a stronger topic for adversity? I also wrote about this in my PS and its influence on 'Why Medicine?' and would like to avoid rehashing though this is for a different perspective. I know the general consensus is that the people who look at the secondary aren't always the people who look at the primary/PS, so wanted more thoughts on repeating this.
Edit: Another question I had regarding secondaries. For the very, very open question of "Is there anything else you'd like the adcom to know?" - Is there any consensus on what to include in this or just leave it blank to avoid making up a BS answer?
Last edited:

