You're a nursing student, so I'm not going to wail on you too much over this statement . . . however, I'm sick of hearing this statement and please never say it again.
The reason physicians are annoyed with the NP movement is because some (not all, maybe not even most, but a vocal fraction) of them are pushing for independent practice despite having substandard education & training. This is about providing patients quality medical care. Bringing up the trite, overused "team" argument is nothing more than a red-herring. So don't do it.
Thanks for not "wailing" on me. Done and noted. I am still learning. You made good points and I already understand your frustration. I have heard multiple employees use titles they are not entitled to use and I think it looks more ignorant on their part (not to mention illegal).
I totally understand your frustrations with the NP movement. An example would be a dental hygienist trying to become a dentist. Most people would not go for that. However, with years of experience and the proper education, we cannot say that a dental hygienist does not know as much as a dentist...it is not our place to assume.
In the end, it seems that we all have better things to do than argue something that is out of our hands. It is ultimately up to federal and state governments to decide; as well as our patients. I actually have a nursing professor who is a FNP and she worked as one for one week and went back to floor nursing because she said she was uncomfortable with her position. I think that should be the determining factor. People who are not confident in their training and what they know, should be smart enough to say "this is out of my hands," (that goes for physicians as well).
As I said in my message, I do NOT want to be a doctor. Being a nurse with any title does not make me a medical doctor (and you guys should never and will never be replaced). I am proud to be a nurse (student at this point). If I wanted to be a doctor I would have gone to medical school. However, I think that there is nothing wrong with NPs or PAs. Used correctly they are very good for the medical field (especially placed with a good physician I am sure they can learn a lot!).
If you look at states where NPs are able to practice independently, they are only repaid 40-50% of what a physician would be repaid (which makes sense). So, most choose not to practice independently even though they are able to.
Speaking of choosing...people have the right to choose. Physicians have the right to choose to hire a NP or a PA and patients have the right to choose whether they see them. With that being said, if NPs training is substandard why do physicians choose to hire NPs? When I talk to physicians who have been in the field for longs periods of time (my father (emergency medicine), and his two brothers (anesthesiologist and psychiatrist)), they tell me that the NPs they work with are excellent and very well trained. So, I think maybe being a resident, the idea of NPs is frustrating, but maybe when you get into your practice you will think differently (or maybe not).
I think as times change so will health care and that is not anyone's fault. There will always be doctors, nurses, cnas, and all in-between. The problem is someone will always work for less and that is what everyone looks for (physicians included). That is not necessarily right or the best way to go, but that is the way of the world. I respect all people willing to give their lives to medicine because it was something I debated doing and it wasn't for me. So, much respect to you all…
I learned in my younger years not to argue with a physician (kind of like a lawyer, you never win). So, I am not trying to argue, just better understand. So, don't get too fired up.