Just some minor clarification but overall, good summary 👍
Thanks. Coming from an osteopathic resident I'm glad that I haven't totally screwed the pooch with my assessment. While I'm not interested in endlessly rehashing this discussion, I would like to address a few small points.
group_theory said:
I think the pain of "explaining what a DO is" to patients is overstated. It's more a pain to explain it to friends and relatives. It's a frequent concern that is brought up by many pre-meds. To many patients, you are "the doctor"
My "explaining what a DO is" comment was a little tongue in cheek, but I stand by my fundamental assertion that the acceptance of DOs is variable by region. I know it isn't always an issue, but compared to MDs it's an unfortunate stigma. If you were to hang out a shingle in Slidell, much of the populace would assume you were some sort of chiropracter.
group_theory said:
You can't clump all of OMM. There are some concepts and techniques of OMM that is scientifically validated (by PhD Physiologists at academic centers) and are utilized by Physical Therapy ... and there are some techniques and concepts that causes students to roll their eyes and grin.
Frankly, I wouldn't know OMM if it bit me in the ass. My knowledge of it is almost entirely vicarious. Based on what I do know, however, my current opinion of it sounds not unlike yours: some baby, a whole lotta bathwater. Hence, I find it curious that the fundamental difference between allopathic and osteopathic curricula is a therapeutic approach that:
1. Has few proven benefits, which are probably best left to PTs
2. Is loaded with garbage
3. Isn't even practiced by the vast majority of DOs
When Andrew Taylor Still founded osteopathy, there was virtually no accurate knowledge of pathophysiology, less in the way of reliable diagnostics, and even fewer effective therapies available. The practice of medicine was rife with charlatans and quackery. While he correctly observed that contemporary medical orthodoxy had serious shortcomings, his observations and practices never went mainstream. This happened because, well, the pharmacotherapy that he renounced
eventually became more successful than the musculoskeletal approach he embraced.
After the divergence of practice (fortuitous for MDs, not so for their DO counterparts), DOs have become more accepted by becoming more mainstream. Their expansion and increasing acceptance over the past 40-60 years hasn't been predicated on DOs being different, it has been based on DOs being the same. From a purely historical standpoint, I view OMM as an artifact, a vestigial remnant of a time when germ theory was cutting edge.
At the end of the day, this little tangent is rather moot, of course. Nobody in the applicant pool gives a rat's ass. Pre-osteos want to become physicians just like pre-allos.
group_theory said:
5 states - Pennsylvania, West Virginia, Florida, Michigan, Oklahoma. If you want more info, you can go over to the osteopathic forum.
Already corrected by JohnnyG in post #25.
group_theory said:
Yep ...
In general, yes.
True ...
Yep
agreed.
Glad you agree. I parsed my words pretty carefully.