2:00 am STEMI - just laziness on the cardiologist standpoint. But no one tracks their miss rate, just death on table rate. Besides, it is only a miss if the cardiologist says it’s a STEMI on Monday morning.
Yes, STEMI from 8-4. After hours or weekends, not a STEMI. Heparinize them and "cool them off."Typical interventional cardiology behavior.
It's a STEMI to me in the right setting.
Yes, STEMI from 8-4. After hours or weekends, not a STEMI. Heparinize them and "cool them off."
Looks like a posterior/inferior STEMI to me.
Contrary to popular belief, most specialists don't get paid to cover call. At my health system, if a hospital has 4 or more physicians covering a specialty (i.e., cardiology), then they are required to rotate a call schedule to cover all days of the month. They do this without any reimbursement.Like, I get it.
They're overworked. They don't wanna have to come and do the interventional thing.
But they wanna take that call money.
Can't have it both ways.
It also underscores two things: (1) America's population is getting sicker and sicker and sicker, and (2) we can't keep up and have a reasonable workload.
- and no, letting pretenders do caths and other procedures isn't a viable solution.
Contrary to popular belief, most specialists don't get paid to cover call. At my health system, if a hospital has 4 or more physicians covering a specialty (i.e., cardiology), then they are required to rotate a call schedule to cover all days of the month. They do this without any reimbursement.
Often it is just baked in as a requirement to maintain privileges - I don't think my group gets any $ for taking call but we do get to keep seeing our patients which keeps them from getting poached by the hospital employed guys I guessWild to hear this (I'm not being adversarial).
Every shop I've worked in has had the "paid-to-be-on-call" arrangement.
Bump
68 yo man with CAD p/w two hours of chest pain and nausea. BP 97/54. No respiratory distress. No prior EKG.
Initial EKG. Do you think this is a STEMI?
View attachment 393274
Was told EMS EKG was more convincing of a STEMI. EMS EKG was reviewed by ER doc and STEMI doc over the phone and was told no STEMI.
EKG #2 was obtained 5 minutes later. Do you think this is a STEMI? No other change in vitals or exam.
View attachment 393275
There was a question as to whether this is an LBBB. Do you think this is an LBBB? Again the case was discussed with the on call cardiologist, felt it was not a STEMI and asked for another EKG and troponin.
Third EKG is basically the same as the second. Initial Hs-Trop was 0.15. Cardiologist still felt this was not a STEMI despite the pt continuing to have real chest pain. Treat medically.
11 hours later...
Pt had a cath, multi-vessel disease. RCA was culprit. RCA balloon angioplastied (not stented) and it was felt pt needed a CABG. Pt transferred and had one several days later.
Not a clear cut LBBB, although QRS > 120. So perhaps an intraventricular conduction delay. You don't really have a broad qs wave in V1 (although maybe?). You certainly don't have a broad, clumsy R wave in V5-V6. In fact in those leads you have a pretty deep s wave, which isn't seen in an LBBB. There was discussion that this didn't meet Sgarbossa criteria. In any event the ER doc spoke to the STEMI doc multiple times about this patient and he didn't go to cath until 11 hours later. Pt did come to the ED at 0200.
This to me looks like a STEMI. In both, and especially the second. There is pretty high j-point elevation before the STE in II, more in III, and in aVF. STD by at least 2-3 mm in 1 and aVL.
To me seems like a clear cut STEMI. What did the trops peak at prior to angioplasty? If the peak trop wasn't sky high prior to revascularization I guess maybe the cardiologist was right.
That's not a trop. That's an HCG!Lol. Check this out. High sensitivity trops:
15
555
13,500
80,200
195,000 (peak)
Lol. Check this out. High sensitivity trops:
15
555
13,500
80,200
195,000 (peak)
The longer I work in our state, the more I realize it doesn’t function like other states…Contrary to popular belief, most specialists don't get paid to cover call. At my health system, if a hospital has 4 or more physicians covering a specialty (i.e., cardiology), then they are required to rotate a call schedule to cover all days of the month. They do this without any reimbursement.
No Brainer, activate. Inferior ST elevation and good story.Bump
68 yo man with CAD p/w two hours of chest pain and nausea. BP 97/54. No respiratory distress. No prior EKG.
Initial EKG. Do you think this is a STEMI?
View attachment 393274
Was told EMS EKG was more convincing of a STEMI. EMS EKG was reviewed by ER doc and STEMI doc over the phone and was told no STEMI.
EKG #2 was obtained 5 minutes later. Do you think this is a STEMI? No other change in vitals or exam.
View attachment 393275
There was a question as to whether this is an LBBB. Do you think this is an LBBB? Again the case was discussed with the on call cardiologist, felt it was not a STEMI and asked for another EKG and troponin.
Third EKG is basically the same as the second. Initial Hs-Trop was 0.15. Cardiologist still felt this was not a STEMI despite the pt continuing to have real chest pain. Treat medically.
11 hours later...
Pt had a cath, multi-vessel disease. RCA was culprit. RCA balloon angioplastied (not stented) and it was felt pt needed a CABG. Pt transferred and had one several days later.
Not a clear cut LBBB, although QRS > 120. So perhaps an intraventricular conduction delay. You don't really have a broad qs wave in V1 (although maybe?). You certainly don't have a broad, clumsy R wave in V5-V6. In fact in those leads you have a pretty deep s wave, which isn't seen in an LBBB. There was discussion that this didn't meet Sgarbossa criteria. In any event the ER doc spoke to the STEMI doc multiple times about this patient and he didn't go to cath until 11 hours later. Pt did come to the ED at 0200.
This to me looks like a STEMI. In both, and especially the second. There is pretty high j-point elevation before the STE in II, more in III, and in aVF. STD by at least 2-3 mm in 1 and aVL.