You're absolutely right, I haven't been an employee at a hospital, so please take that into account as you read my responses. However, I do feel I have done my research, and have spoken at great depth with hospital staff in relation to these issues.
I would disagree, however, that "most" nurses today have lost touch with what it means to be a true nurse. That's an interesting statement, I'm curious to hear why you think this is the case. I'm a little more perplexed by your next sentence in which I'm guessing is your description of qualities of a "true nurse". How can "most" of the nurses you have observed fit this description, yet "most nurses today have lost what it means to be a true nurse" ? I'm not trying to be nitpicky, I'm just trying to figure out what I'm missing here. Most RNs, the ones I've observed in a hospital setting, and the ones I've talked to casually seem to take pride in caring for the patient as a human being, tending to their needs, Well of course. One would hope that would be a given. We are after all taking care of people, not objects. communicating the patient's emotions to the physician this statement comes across as a little silly (not trying to be mean)- but really physicians can figure that out on their own during their rounds. Physicians generally don't ask us how Mrs. X is doing (in terms of being happy, sad, scared, etc.) and should that sort of thing be volunteered, it would be met with a response ranging from "that's nice" to "what's your point?" It only warrants a call to the physician when a patients emotional/behavioral response is newly out of proportion with the situation and/or resulting in an unsafe situation requiring pharmacologic and/or restraint-type intervention., assisting the physician This varies greatly by setting, but in my unit (ICU/NSICU), we rarely do any actual "assisting". Physicians make their rounds, assess (maybe) the patient, write orders (or not), and may or may not discuss the patient at all with the RN. I'm not saying it's good or bad, it's just how it is. Actual assisting generally only applies to the actual performance of procedures, such as central line placement, ventriculostomy insertion, intubation, etc. which is a small percentage of what goes on- if at all., and serving as a conduit to the family members needs. This is a big hell yes. Sometimes to the point in which the family monopolizes way too much time that it actually becomes an interference. But of course our care is by nature patient and family centered. This breed of nurse still exists. As I stated earlier though, the development of this autonomous "medical-nursing" DNP degree may severely jeopardize the definition of nurse (How is a DNP in opposition to your description of nursing as stated above?)- creating a new nursing hierarchy where the traditional RN nurse is somehow second-standard to this DNP. This is entirely false, obviously, since the RN may actually be more representative of what it means to be a true nurse.
I wanted to include some further insight into what "nursing" really is- at least from the particulars of where I practice. Starting at the beginning of the shift, actually usually a little earlier, I start jotting down relevant information about my patient from the Kardex and from the electronic records and of course from the offgoing RNs report. Basically, I have 30 minutes to get what I need to know for my one or two patients, plus do joint neuro assessments (when needed) plus double check certain medicated drips, do the chart check and med list check (with the offgoing RN). Then next I need to completely assess both patients, addressing physiologic problems, pain/anxiety issues, psychsocial issues, family issues, giving whatever medication needs to be given, documenting everything (which is fairly burdensome). It's actually a continual process. In order to give safe, let alone effective care, I have to understand what is wrong with the patient, what treatment is appropriate, what outcomes are trying to be acheived, what adverse affects/complications to prevent and be vigillant for, what further diagnostic or therapeutic interventions are anticipated, etc. I also need to make sure that the patients' hygiene needs are met, that they are repositioned q 2 h, that they don't pull out any of their invasive equipment, or fall out of bed. I have to teach them about their medications, therapies, etc and document it. I have to ensure that everything is compliant with policy and Joint Commission standards. It's really a helluva lot of responsiblity with a ton of demands that need to be prioritized. Nurses are actually quite autonomous and need to be able to recognize and respond to problems independently- knowing when and when it is not appropriate to notify the physician (and which one, at that). Most times when I need to call, I am asking for a specific intervention and the physician agrees. This is not to say I consider my knowledge/skills equal to a physician. The quality of nursing care truly can make or break how well a patient can recover. The patient is at the mercy, so to speak, of one nurse (with little if any physician or other discipline face time) for 8-12 hours. That's why quality of nursing care is so important. Nursing is definitely not the career for everybody. It is physically, mentally, and emotionally taxing, but at the same time incredibly rewarding.
Wow, long winded, sorry. I hope it helps you in some way, though.
For whatever reason, it seems there is a belief among nurses that nursing is somehow a field that lacks respect. In many ways, this manifests itself with an inferiority complex, which is what I think is propelling the creation of the DNP.