- Joined
- Apr 14, 2008
- Messages
- 216
- Reaction score
- 2
Well I was wondering if doing orchestra throughout college looks as good as being in a sport through college, and I mean does it look good to the med schools.
no way.
do you spend 5 hours on orchestra a day? do you have to wake up at 5:00 am every morning? do you travel like every other weekend? no.
i'm sure orchestra still looks good, though.
So the value of an activity is determined by how much time you spend doing it? hmm...
Isn't as big of a time commitment as a more "serious" study of music but yeh, I do see your point.In many ways it is. Especially considering that sports take up so much time and also tire out the participants both mentally and physically to a greater extent than violin does. I will admit I don't play violin and never have, but you also haven't participated in a varsity sport.
I have practice for 3 hrs a day before class and then am recommended to do at least another hour of practice a day after classes. I know many people involved in a capella (which is huge at my school) and one of them is on my team and it isn't nearly as much of a commitment as my sport is.
I play the violin.
like omg! so do i!
though, i started out in music school and got a .90 GPA from there!
ouch!!
x2 on the forget the haters
Sports obviously take much more physically out of you, but to claim that serious musical study can not/is not as emotionally draining is just silly.
Though in sports your individual skill is much more visable- you train hard, and that training yields results! Often in large musical ensembles it is easy to assume the *strength in numbers* mentality.
OP... the real question comes down to were you the type to practice daily, show up to orchestra early, and actually be able to play your part, or were you the type that just shows up for a couple of hours without practicing and blend into the sea of violins, because you played seriously in high school?
If the former, good for you!
I have seen way too many of the latter at my school, and it is incredibly irritating
Thats awesome well besides the GPA, lol. Have you played Mock Morris or Russlan and Ludmila?
And I just want to say thanks for your input guys, whether it comes across negative or positive I value it all.
oh wow, i've played russlan and ludmila but not mock morris. is that some sort of jewish piece?
How a college athlete could put multiple hours in a day to their sport and STILL pull off good grades amazes me.
Playing an instrument requires MUCH time and practice, but the physical and emotional drain it takes from you doesn't even compare to a sport.
ECs aren't judged by how "physically and mentally draining" they are.
Why would dedicating so much time and energy to "playing games" be considered a positive attribute? A lot of athletes seem to think that playing these childrens' games makes them some noble martyr. It's just silly.
Its also a distribution of wealth that is questionable . Tell the inspirining teacher making 30k her job is "less important" than M. Jordan's basketball career.While I agree with most of the general message of your post, I have to disagree with your labeling of sports as "children's games". Most of the competitive and widely participated sports are professional careers for adults earning millions and millions. I think this justifies it being more than just a children's game even though many athletes and aspiring athletes devote large portions of their childhood to preparing and participating in these sports.
Its also a distribution of wealth that is questionable . Tell the inspirining teacher making 30k her job is "less important" than M. Jordan's basketball career.
While I agree with most of the general message of your post, I have to disagree with your labeling of sports as "children's games". Most of the competitive and widely participated sports are professional careers for adults earning millions and millions. I think this justifies it being more than just a children's game even though many athletes and aspiring athletes devote large portions of their childhood to preparing and participating in these sports.
Clearly you know nothing about the dedication it takes to play an instrument well enough to be in an orchestra.
I didn't mean to be a hater and sorry if I came across that way.
Orchestra and a serious devotion to it is definitely important to you application. In my opinion I don't think it's as big as sports, but that's my opinion. I'm an athlete and because of that I sort of assume that sports are harder, but I am not a violinist so I don't know first person.
are you serious? several of my friends are in my school's orchestra. i also have several friends who are D1 athletes.
clearly YOU do not know anything about college sports. ppl in orchestra do not practice 5 hours a day. most practice an hour/day and that's it. they then have orchestra class 3 times a week, in which they don't even have to go to every practice, and have maybe TWO concerts a semester. they also get a grade each semester for being in orchestra, which only inflates their GPAs because everyone gets As.
i'm done with you, especially since the rest of this thread has already flamed you. do your fingers get tired from moving that bow across your violin? awww
and for everyone else who doesn't actually have exposure to both sports vs. orchestra...i know both D1 athletes and orchestra ppl who are like violinists, violists, etc., and i assure you sports take at least 3x more dedication.
Sports take a lot of intelligence and are very mental. Don't judge just because you don't participate as lacking in brains.
I don't think this can be easily settled since I don't know anyone who aces their classes, competes at a high level and is a committed musician simply because doing so would be CRAZY. If you are able to demonstrate how committed to music you are then it does reflect well upon you to the AdCom. It probably depends upon the particular person whether they think orchestra or sports are more mentally and physically challenging so both probably look good.
Don't judge athletes as simply being "dumb" jocks... since honestly we aren't!
So true. All the music theory and eartraining that music majors have to go through is actually pretty hard!!!Irritating how people assume music majors chose the "easiest" major...
no way.
do you spend 5 hours on orchestra a day? do you have to wake up at 5:00 am every morning? do you travel like every other weekend? no.
i'm sure orchestra still looks good, though.
How about this...
I've been competitive in sports AND music in my life. The fact of the matter is this:
It doesn't matter what discipline, activity or skill you are talking about, if you practice it a high level they both require an insane commitment, passion and time devotion.
This talk of which is a more valuable, music or sports, is in my opinion, absolute and complete nonsense.
What matters is your personal devotion to the activity that you're doing.
Keep in mind that this is coming from someone who has been nationally and internationally competitive at both music and athletics. They both require gigantic time and effort.
at first, i thought this thread read something like "can you list orchestra as a sport?"
America has been becoming increasingly obsessed with sports. The top sports athletes make millions while a violinist in the Chicago Philharmonic makes a mere pittance in comparison. The ironic part is that in my opinion, the violinist had to work just as hard, if not harder, to achieve the same level of mastery as the top athlete. A person can be born naturally larger and more athletic than others giving them an early advantage in sports. No one is born with the innate ability to play a musical instrument.
Sports take a lot of intelligence and are very mental. Don't judge just because you don't participate as lacking in brains.
I don't think this can be easily settled since I don't know anyone who aces their classes, competes at a high level and is a committed musician simply because doing so would be CRAZY. If you are able to demonstrate how committed to music you are then it does reflect well upon you to the AdCom. It probably depends upon the particular person whether they think orchestra or sports are more mentally and physically challenging so both probably look good.
Don't judge athletes as simply being "dumb" jocks... since honestly we aren't!
Some of the guys I rowed with were pretty smart, but I've met more than my fair share of meat-head rowers
you Want Meatheads, Try Spending An Evening With A Percussionist Sometime
I Know A Concert Percussionist With A Phd In Performance Who Farts In Beer Bottles At Orchestra Dinner Parties. As Both A Former Competitive Athlete And A Trained Musician, I Can Vouch That Both Are Equally Ineffective Markers Of Your ******edness And/or Awesomeness, But Both Look Great On A Resume Or Med School App.
...both look great on a resume or med school app.
You want meatheads, try spending an evening with a percussionist sometime
I know a concert percussionist with a PhD in performance who farts in beer bottles at orchestra dinner parties. As both a former competitive athlete and a trained musician, I can vouch that both are equally ineffective markers of your ******edness and/or awesomeness, but both look great on a resume or med school app.
How about this...
I've been competitive in sports AND music in my life. The fact of the matter is this:
It doesn't matter what discipline, activity or skill you are talking about, if you practice it a high level they both require an insane commitment, passion and time devotion.
This talk of which is a more valuable, music or sports, is in my opinion, absolute and complete nonsense.
What matters is your personal devotion to the activity that you're doing.
Keep in mind that this is coming from someone who has been nationally and internationally competitive at both music and athletics. They both require gigantic time and effort.