maybe. and, i certainly cannot make a strong counter-argument to what you say. i do, however (and unlike many highschool->college->med school->residency->real world), have many years of experience in the healthcare industry, prior to becoming a physician, to back it up. so, "rhetoric"... "empty prose"... perhaps. but, i have ideas, based on experience, and that's a lot more than many people who wish to keep doing things the same old way. it's just not going to continue to be tolerated in our field, and we're going to soon be in a position where the bulk of our outside-the-OR-time is spent in meetings, discussions, negotiations, etc., etc.
that is, unless...
i signed a contract. i am aware of this. i would not expect anyone to be employed, in our profession, without one.
so did i.
but, i'll give you an example of the something in the contract at the "other place" that resulted (among a few other things) in me not signing. in their non-competition clause, they wanted to restrict me to not taking additional employment in the same city for two years after expiration or termination, regardless of whether i or they initiated cancellation. this would've meant that they could've fired me, and then i couldn't have gone and worked for their competitors across town (whom i didn't even interview with). i basically told them they were smoking dope and that anyone who'd sign such a contract was a *****, not in those exact words of course (which are reserved for my candor here).
now, i understand why they did this and why they want this. but, reading between the lines, it tells me that they've had a problem in the past with such practice, which is a serious red flag that subtly speaks to other potential morale problems there. additionally, the salary wasn't as good as where i ended-up (the offer from my soon-to-be employer came in about 10 days after the first), yet the promised work hours and time off was much better. however, after seeing their rigidity and complete unwillingness to budge in this covenant, i started to believe that maybe they weren't being honest with me about actual work time either. (and, what the kids may want to know is that you are not actually talking directly with the people who are hiring you during this. it's like buying a car. your lawyer is talking with their lawyers. it's like you're standing in the bleachers with binoculars.)
i may be wrong, but again my spidey-sense was pinging. in retrospect, i got a much better deal. i'll have to work a bit harder on the face of contract, but i believe these guys are being straight-up with me. at least, i got (most of) what i wanted in writing. if they kick me out, they pay the tail. if they kick me out in the first two years, the convenant not to compete is expired. no-contigency buy in at the end of the two-year contract guaranteed. those are the big brush strokes. my lawyer has assured me that the rest of the contract is equitable for both parties and contains nothing outrageous or unexpected. i just have to show and do my job, which is expected and what i always intended to do anyway. and my brother, also a lawyer (but not a contracts expert), said it looks fine too.
other than the fact that i was a mid-manager at a large healthcare delivery company negotiating and managing service contracts with anywhere from 12-15 employees directly reporting to me at any given time, i just gave it to you. 🙂