- Joined
- Oct 23, 2005
- Messages
- 8,066
- Reaction score
- 5,854
View attachment 398914View attachment 398915View attachment 398916
Thick ligament so not the prettiest flat line.
Thank you Steve.
View attachment 398914View attachment 398915View attachment 398916
Thick ligament so not the prettiest flat line.
I usually have my needle tip more midline and don’t always get the thin line.
I have virtually zero vagal episodes, and the CESI is the least likely procedure to cause problems in my practice. It’s the least painful, fastest and usually the smoothest procedure I do. If you’re gonna get a vagal it’s prob a lumbar TFESI on a hot radic in my experience.Good reference. Hopefully we all evolve. I must admit I’m now considering the Lobel approach for speed, reduced radiation, and less vagals. I get almost all my vagals from CESI even with PO Xanax and generous lido.
If I swap out my 18G Harpoon for a 25G acupuncture needle, I expect I’ll see less vagals.
It’s the same. No difference. Contrast midline or far lateral will look blobby and less clean, but a CESI using an IL approach is usually a bilateral injection.I’m typically more midline as well.
Can anyone speak to their rationale of being more or less midline using the 25G quincke technique for CESI?
Usual CESI patient is one level disk herniation at C-6. Bias the medicine to that side. No difference in procedure.I’m typically more midline as well.
Can anyone speak to their rationale of being more or less midline using the 25G quincke technique for CESI?
Usual CESI patient is one level disk herniation at C-6. Bias the medicine to that side. No difference in procedure.
Usual CESI patient is one level disk herniation at C-6. Bias the medicine to that side. No difference in procedure.
It’s the same. No difference. Contrast midline or far lateral will look blobby and less clean, but a CESI using an IL approach is usually a bilateral injection.
I have virtually zero vagal episodes, and the CESI is the least likely procedure to cause problems in my practice. It’s the least painful, fastest and usually the smoothest procedure I do. If you’re gonna get a vagal it’s prob a lumbar TFESI on a hot radic in my experience.
I have thought about wearing a GoPro and filming one to post bc of how much I support this technique.
I’ve done them since Dec 2019 and I can’t understand why anyone would use a freaking 18-20g Tuohy for a cervical. You’re NOT sticking me with that needle.
I second all of this. Only thing I would add is use contrast as your LOR fluid. It’s real time and saves a step and timeYou're going to get a couple of wet taps during fellowship. Don't sweat it. Since fellowship, I've had just one wet tap in my entire career by using the fellow technique:
1) Avoid injecting at levels whereby there is severe stenosis.
2) Stay near midline, but make sure you don't cross midline --> If you switched to CLO, but had to travel quite some distance to get to the VILL, you may have accidentally crossed midline, so don't be afraid to go back to AP to make sure you haven't crossed, then return to CLO, and proceed.
3) Make sure you have a true CLO. Dogma is 45 degrees for lumbar, 45-55 for cervical, but every patient is different. The lamina should be crisp.
4) Use a glass LOR syringe (I've found these are much more sensitive to pressure loss)
5) Advance under CONTINUOUS pressure with your LOR syringe. Not only is this more sensitive, but some believe that the pressurized water jet pushes the dura away the instant you enter the epidural space, thus protecting the dura from puncture.
6) When you advance, make sure your fingers grasp the needle at the skin, with the side of your palm/wrist resting/posting on the patient's back (this is for maximal control). Advancement should be made by "rolling" your thumb and index fingers (the fingers grasping the needle shaft). Advancement should not require anything but your fingers. If you're using your hand/wrist (or anything else), your advancements will be too coarse, and uncontrolled. Once you are at/near the VILL, advancements should be made in 1 mm (or less) increments, again, under continuous pressure.
7) Pay special attention to tissue feel. Once you get to that "connective tissue" feel, switch to LOR even if you aren't yet at the VILL.
With this, you shall not wet tap (much).
Thankfully, I don't have any pictures of that!Super cool! You can see it.
Any idea what intrathecal air would look like?
At the very least try a 20g T. No need for 18.Good reference. Hopefully we all evolve. I must admit I’m now considering the Lobel approach for speed, reduced radiation, and less vagals. I get almost all my vagals from CESI even with PO Xanax and generous lido.
If I swap out my 18G Harpoon for a 25G acupuncture needle, I expect I’ll see less vagals.
I used an 18g exclusively in fellowship because my attendings attested to its better tactile feel, but now I use the 20g out of the kit and have not noticed a difference.At the very least try a 20g T. No need for 18.
Not deep, you are a little lateral, so it looks perfect.Steep angle bc we had to cephalad tilt the c-arm a lot due to pt positioning. I am rarely this steep.
View attachment 399205View attachment 399206View attachment 399207View attachment 399208
Steep, I'm not usually that steep of an angle.Not deep, you are a little lateral, so it looks perfect.
Silly question but do you target the tip of the lamina line at the inferior or superior lamina before you inject contrast?Steep angle bc we had to cephalad tilt the c-arm a lot due to pt positioning. I am rarely this steep.
View attachment 399205View attachment 399206View attachment 399207View attachment 399208
Neither. Pre-med them and use Omnipaqueso wait, whats the consensus for what you guys do for Cervical ESIs for patients with anaphylactic contrast allergies? Air or Gad?
It probably doesn’t matter, but I’d rather get in closer to C7 than T1. The flatter the approach the higher your medication is going to spread.Silly question but do you target the tip of the lamina line at the inferior or superior lamina before you inject contrast?
Steep angle bc we had to cephalad tilt the c-arm a lot due to pt positioning. I am rarely this steep.
View attachment 399205View attachment 399206View attachment 399207View attachment 399208
Personally, I do a more gentle curve with the 25g than I would with a MBB, as to not have a cutting swipe if it is to rotate.Great thread everyone. I too have been reluctant to switch to the Lobel/Mitch method, it seems very good but for some reason just don't feel comfortable.
1 Did you guys start these in the lumbar spine before going to CESIs?
2 Do you curve the tip of the 25g or just come straight in?
3 Any advantage to coming in caudal to cephalad angle or straight down?
4 Does anyone actually have any good photos of intrathecal contrast spread in the cervical spine? I can't seem to find much online beside this: https://academic.oup.com/painmedicine/article/23/3/590/6395368 - which to me looks very similar to the epidural spread.
5 Do you avoid levels with a listhesis? Seems to be very high risk for wet tap?
1 Did you guys start these in the lumbar spine before going to CESIs?Great thread everyone. I too have been reluctant to switch to the Lobel/Mitch method, it seems very good but for some reason just don't feel comfortable.
1 Did you guys start these in the lumbar spine before going to CESIs?
2 Do you curve the tip of the 25g or just come straight in?
3 Any advantage to coming in caudal to cephalad angle or straight down?
4 Does anyone actually have any good photos of intrathecal contrast spread in the cervical spine? I can't seem to find much online beside this: https://academic.oup.com/painmedicine/article/23/3/590/6395368 - which to me looks very similar to the epidural spread.
5 Do you avoid levels with a listhesis? Seems to be very high risk for wet tap?
I do not use 25g in the lumbar spine any longer, and instead use a 22g tuohy because my volume is greater in the lumbar spine (5cc or so), and I do not like pushing 5cc through a 25g needle because I'm worried about my hands over time. The resistance is significant. Agree on flimsy needle getting beaten up in the lumbar spine too. Definitely true.Personally, I do a more gentle curve with the 25g than I would with a MBB, as to not have a cutting swipe if it is to rotate.
I use the 25g in C and L spine, but occasionally have issue with osteophytes and degenerative anatomy in the L spine messing up the 25g. I don’t really see this in the Cspine.
I avoid levels with significant listhesis, more conservative in the Cspine.
LOR first IMO. You need to know how to do LOR because there are times I do it if things just do not look right and I am second guessing myself. Happened this AM actually. I'll have a contrast pattern I simply do not trust, and I'll prove it using LOR as a double layer of accuracy.To those that use a 25g in the cervical spine -
If you were teaching fellows, would you teach this technique right out the gate - or would you want them to first develop a traditional LOR technique?
I do not use 25g in the lumbar spine any longer, and instead use a 22g tuohy because my volume is greater in the lumbar spine (5cc or so), and I do not like pushing 5cc through a 25g needle because I'm worried about my hands over time. The resistance is significant. Agree on flimsy needle getting beaten up in the lumbar spine too. Definitely true.
Depo through a 25g pushed with a 3cc syringe is no issue. No reason to use this technique if you’re not using a 25.I typically use depo for CESI. If I adopt this CESI technique, I think I’m going to either use a 23G Quincke or a 22G touhy.
I typical use a needle size at least 23G for procedures where I’m injecting depo. Saves my wrists and I agree with ducts comment about end procedure issues with 25G.
Some of the generic depos will clog a 25g.Depo through a 25g pushed with a 3cc syringe is no issue. No reason to use this technique if you’re not using a 25.
They’ll clog 22 as well.Some of the generic depos will clog a 25g.
3cc syringe?Did lobel/mitch approach with 25 gauge for cervical Ilesi today. Worked like a charm. Little tougher to push the meds to be expected but all good.
Thanks guys!
5 cc syringe3cc syringe?
Also, this is the Lobel technique, not mine.
3cc5 cc syringe
Next time
Distribution unlimited? Do they have good prices on other stuff?@Taus you should try the du medical epidural kit. Really nice 20g Tuohy that seems very thin with an excellent generic Epilor syringe. $6.50
Tray.
How much volume are you using? I'm probably at 2.5 cc. I use a 20 g Touhy. I get a vagal maybe 5% of the time.Good reference. Hopefully we all evolve. I must admit I’m now considering the Lobel approach for speed, reduced radiation, and less vagals. I get almost all my vagals from CESI even with PO Xanax and generous lido.
If I swap out my 18G Harpoon for a 25G acupuncture needle, I expect I’ll see less vagals.
Seems high. Recall bias? Dex?How much volume are you using? I'm probably at 2.5 cc. I use a 20 g Touhy. I get a vagal maybe 5% of the time.
It’s prob way less than 5%How much volume are you using? I'm probably at 2.5 cc. I use a 20 g Touhy. I get a vagal maybe 5% of the time.
Yeah, that is surprisingly high. Unless the rate you see is a lot higher with your population on lumbar tfesi. That is my highest rate procedure, typically in the stereotypical population young muscled up dudes with tattoos with acute disc herniation and painful radic. I always remind them if they need another one to let us know ahead of time and I will send in some benzos. Really screws up the flow of the day…(triazolam ftw!)It’s prob way less than 5%
Pull back and inject contrast and see where it goes before advancing without knowing where the flow is.Lobel/Mitch
When doing your technique and you feel resistance when injecting the contrast do you keep pushing or take this as ligament engagement and then advance? Almost as if you are doing intermittent LOR?