- Joined
- Feb 18, 2017
- Messages
- 9,917
- Reaction score
- 16,589
*squint*I think it's a post restriction or some form of role-connected thing, perhaps.
I didn’t get that impression, it’s not been consistent from him
*squint*I think it's a post restriction or some form of role-connected thing, perhaps.
Okay papáI made up a bedtime story about submitting my night action.
I’d hardly call it a legitimate claim.
Idk what he's doing then. I do appreciate puns though so*squint*
I didn’t get that impression, it’s not been consistent from him
why did you believe this?I…believe this. @potentialsheltervet give me your thoughts
I’m saying two things:i'm curious, what are you specifically arguing. is it that my logic is unfounded because of a few counterexamples, okay so what's the conclusion and what's the purpose of sending the post?
Did you not?why did you believe this?
it's way too early to make that read, and i'm difficult to read correctly to begin withDid you not?
I do agree with point one here, even if I’m not understanding point 2I’m saying two things:
1: I disagree with the foundational merits of the assumption that because you’re a tourist, there must be a tracker/watcher.
2: Regardless of if there is or isn’t a Tracker/Watcher, having the conversation of solving that isn’t helping village find wolves, so it isn’t worth discussing.
No I just want to demonstrate the full effect of my softing my role from gGoats. So you really get the absurdity of it.I think it's a post restriction or some form of role-connected thing, perhaps.
1) your logic is anecdotal, mine is quite simple and straightforward, i'm not even sure why you disagreed with it because it is not alignment indicativeI’m saying two things:
1: I disagree with the foundational merits of the assumption that because you’re a tourist, there must be a tracker/watcher.
2: Regardless of if there is or isn’t a Tracker/Watcher, having the conversation of solving that isn’t helping village find wolves, so it isn’t worth discussing.
Why for 2, though? It literally doesn't matter who you visit. It's like a fruit vendor asking on thread what fruit they should send. It doesn't matter because it's totally pointless.1) your logic is anecdotal, mine is quite simple and straightforward, i'm not even sure why you disagreed with it because it is not alignment indicative
2) i invoked the logic because it is what made me claim, so i explained all my suppositions. consensus on who i should visit tonight is something i want discussed
it's life and death for me if i visit wrong and someone sees, but mehWhy for 2, though? It literally doesn't matter who you visit. It's like a fruit vendor asking on thread what fruit they should send. It doesn't matter because it's totally pointless.
How can you not understand point 2?I do agree with point one here, even if I’m not understanding point 2
so if we discuss whomst you visit, and wolves kill that person, and you're tracked, how does that help us at all?it's life and death for me if i visit wrong and someone sees, but meh
shorty has some statistics she's posted previously on predictive value of the Lupin rule. At this point though, you're correct. The odds of there being at least one wolf in half the players are good.Okay, so I want to provide some more thoughts on the Lupin Rule:
1. Having a rule cover the first 5 players is pretty arbitrary. 5 players in a 10 player game is much different than a 20 player game. A more robust rule would be a certain percentage
2. I'm going to compare posting order against wolfiness in the last few games. Santy offered that wolfiness was in the bottom 3rd, and I will hypothesize wolfiness is actual most likely in middle 3rd (middle of the pack, to better blend in)
3. Pasta - out of the 16 players, a wolf posted 8th, 10th, and 14th. This means 2 in the middle and 1 at the end
4.
I think the lupin rule is dumb and naturally holds true for a lot of games just by sheer numbers lol. I don’t think it really should be taken seriouslyOkay, so I want to provide some more thoughts on the Lupin Rule:
1. Having a rule cover the first 5 players is pretty arbitrary. 5 players in a 10 player game is much different than a 20 player game. A more robust rule would be a certain percentage
2. I'm going to compare posting order against wolfiness in the last few games. Santy offered that wolfiness was in the bottom 3rd, and I will hypothesize wolfiness is actual most likely in middle 3rd (middle of the pack, to better blend in)
3. Pasta - out of the 16 players, a wolf posted 8th, 10th, and 14th. This means 2 in the middle and 1 at the end
4. Noob - out of 22 players, a wolf posted 6, 7, 11, and 22. So 2 in the front, 1 in the middle, and 1 at the end. Notably, there were still 0 wolves in the first 5 posters
There are obviously many more games to look at, but this post is already long enough
edit - finished the post
How can you visit wrong?? I'm not understanding.it's life and death for me if i visit wrong and someone sees, but meh
Oh, is that what it meant? I just genuinely didn’t understand wjat you were sayingHow can you not understand point 2?
I’m saying we shouldn’t talk about village PRs.
You would agree with that, no?
forces the kill to be on a specific person who you guys decide which has self explanatory benefitsso if we discuss whomst you visit, and wolves kill that person, and you're tracked, how does that help us at all?
if i visit the nightkill targetHow can you visit wrong?? I'm not understanding.
If I were a wolf I wouldn't kill that person just out of spite and also because you might not be who you say you are.forces the kill to be on a specific person who you guys decide which has self explanatory benefits
exactly????If I were a wolf I wouldn't kill that person just out of spite and also because you might not be who you say you are.
Yes, so we aren't picking the NK target at all...?exactly????
now you understand why i could never claim this role after d1 and why i claimed it instantly, it's basically anti town as far as PR's goI have to be honest, at this point it feels like you claimed in an effort to get out ahead of potential tracking or watching because you're gonna go chop chop someone.
but then i visit someone else who isn't the nk which benefits meYes, so we aren't picking the NK target at all...?
Yeah I thought about it for like 5 seconds and realized jts probably townClem pls. Tourists are mafia now? smh. How will Disney ever recover?
I have to be honest, at this point it feels like you claimed in an effort to get out ahead of potential tracking or watching because you're gonna go chop chop someone.
so it doesn't clear you either if there's more than one wolf in the gameexactly????
Okay but think about it for 25 seconds and get back to meYeah I thought about it for like 5 seconds and realized jts probably town
this role gets me thrown into the stratosphere wrt the chances i'm chopped, i don't ask to be cleared and i shouldn't be considering the role. getting myself not chopped because of my role is the sole purpose for claiming, i'm auto poe for now but that's fineso it doesn't clear you either if there's more than one wolf in the game
I actually do understand the logic of Lucy’s claim.this role gets me thrown into the stratosphere wrt the chances i'm chopped, i don't ask to be cleared and i shouldn't be considering the role. getting myself not chopped because of my role is the sole purpose for claiming, i'm auto poe for now but that's fine
Not to me but probably because it's something I would do 🤣Claiming before N1 and then presumably being the one who does the kills is kind of an insane strategy
Okay but does it, PSV?I have to be honest, at this point it feels like you claimed in an effort to get out ahead of potential tracking or watching because you're gonna go chop chop someone.
If I wasn’t village reading you I’d be haggling over the utility bills for your pockets.zenge town
What's criminal is how many times you've used the same pun.Okay but does it, PSV?
Does it?
Because that feels like an easy point to jump on and push illegitimate sus.
It feels criminal.
@potentialsheltervet![]()
Reflexive?there's a reflexive serial killer?
Yeah but you should have seen it in gGoats when I was legitimately trying to be sneaky and soft that I was a jailer. I was not being sneaky. smhWhat's criminal is how many times you've used the same pun.
You gotta italicize it or it doesn’t count.What's criminal is how many times you've used the same pun.
idk if it's a thing.Reflexive?
Fair, but I'll just say I started that rabbit hole before Lucy's role reveal, and threadstate was pretty quiet. I had also made a promise to Santy to conduct some investigation on previous games@mightyrunner7 Do you have thoughts about the game unrelated to the Lupin rule?
I feel like a reflexive serial killer is just a multi-nighr PGO, no?So what if there are no vanillagers, only compulsive tourists, and there's a reflexive serial killer?
Just what did you mean by reflexive?idk if it's a thing.