Dec 3, 2011
1,071
93
"The Library"
Status
Pre-Medical
I'm not aware of any laws in place, but as with all other medical operations, determining whether or not to go ahead with the surgery depends on the cost-benefit analysis as well as the wishes of the parents. Cases like the Jodie and Mary case are ethically very complicated to determine, but more "routine" cases usually go forth if all parties are in agreement. Then you've got those two teenage girls on TLC who were not separated and have managed to lead as routine a life as possible despite being conjoined.

So in short, it really depends on a lot of factors...
 

gyngyn

Staff member
Administrator
Moderator
Lifetime Donor
7+ Year Member
Nov 4, 2011
23,846
38,916
Status
Attending Physician

Erakis

5+ Year Member
Jan 24, 2013
178
8
Status
Resident [Any Field]
Empirically, I agree with the second ethicist, but from the parent's point of view, it reminds me of the philosophical "trolley car" thought experiment.

The trolley car is a hypothetical in which you witness an out of control trolley car with fifteen passengers that will crash at the bottom of a hill and kill everyone on board. You are in a position to switch the tracks to a track that will slow the car to a stop, but there is a bystander on that track that will die if you switch it. This one is somewhat easy to make since you may be sacrificing one person, though "passively" to save fifteen.

The second variation asks the same question, but this time there is no switch, just a bystander who is large enough to slow the trolley down safely if you were to push him into the car's path. This is morally less acceptable, since you actively kill the bystander to save the fifteen.

From the parent's point of view, they are actively killing one child to save the other. This may not medically be the case depending on the level of parasitism that the weaker twin exerted on the stronger. Empirically, it's easy to agree with the compulsion to perform the procedure, but the parents are also being disenfranchised while acting in good faith to not cause active direct harm to one of their children. This was sure to be significantly emotionally harmful to the parents.