- Joined
- Nov 6, 2007
- Messages
- 351
- Reaction score
- 0
I can't figure out why would one use etomidate/propofol mix for induction for crani for tumor resection vs. just propofol. Patient was stable, BP was ok.
Last edited:
I can't figure out why would one use etomidate/propofol mix for induction for crani for tumor resection vs. just propofol. Patient was stable, BP was ok.
You are right, there is no reason to do such a thing.I can't figure out why would one use etomidate/propofol mix for induction for crani for tumor resection vs. just propofol. Patient was stable, BP was ok.
NoTHE drug of choice here is thiopental. Isn't anyone using thiopental anymore? (SHEESH!)
-copro
Why not?
-copro
So the deal is that I am doing a presentation on this case, and I want to be able to explain why certain drugs were given etc. Should I just say that etomidate was not necessary? Are there any studies done on that or its just your experience?
Also what is your guys' experience on precordial doppler? Ever came handy?
THE drug of choice here is thiopental. Isn't anyone using thiopental anymore? (SHEESH!)
-copro
The crani was not sitting, but head was up some. They didn't have central line but had precordial doppler, and their reasoning was that if there was VAE they'd just put head down and pour saline into surgical field. Some attending told me also that if there was VAE central line wouldn't help and you just treat symptoms.
No
i asked for some from pharmacy the other day and they sent me penicillin
Mixing Etomidate and Propofol is not based on any scientific evidence and it has never been studied pharmacologically to my knowledge.So the deal is that I am doing a presentation on this case, and I want to be able to explain why certain drugs were given etc. Should I just say that etomidate was not necessary? Are there any studies done on that or its just your experience?
Also what is your guys' experience on precordial doppler? Ever came handy?
No
i asked for some from pharmacy the other day and they sent me penicillin
Mixing Etomidate and Propofol is not based on any scientific evidence and it has never been studied pharmacologically to my knowledge.
What is the induction dose of a Propofol + Etomidate mixture?
How do they interact?
Is there a real brain protective effect?
No one really knows.
So this practice is at best experimental and anecdotal.
OK, I trained at a time when thiopental was still a main stream induction agent and I probably induced more people with thiopental than you induced with propofol or any induction agent combined, and I can tell you with certainty that it's not as great as you might think, it is less flexible and it causes slower emergence and it is not as easy to titrate as Propofol.Dude, you win a huge for even asking for it.
This is a great induction agent that has been squeezed outta the market by propofol and etomidate, and not necessarily rightfully so. If you've got a good, well-functioning, patent IV line, there's no reason not to use it. The problem with it is that it has been around since the 1940's, has a much-maligned and undeserved reputation of being a "dangerous" drug (e.g. extravasation issues, hemodynamic instability, etc.), and is not routinely stocked at many pharmacies.
I don't think the benefits in head trauma/surgery are theoretical. It has an excellent side-effect profile, it almost immediately drastically reduces the CMRO2 and does it better than propofol and etomidate, and also provides better cerebral protection than most other agents.
We, in this era of cost containment, should be thinking about equally effective and less costly alternatives. Droperidol is another one that comes to mind (unless your patient is going home the same day). But, we are compelled by those that purchase the drugs - and the pharmaceutical companies marketing them - that somehow certain meds (ondansetron, propofol, etc.) are somehow inherently better than other meds. We never stop to fully question why we believe this; we just believe it.
I'm not at all suggesting that you use thiopental for every case. But, in certain select cases, especially those where there is some sort of space occupying lesion inside the calvarium, you should give it a try. You don't slam it in like I see a lot of my resident and physician colleauges do with other meds, and probably the standard 5mg/kg induction dose is WAY too liberal and unnecessary. But, have a good fast-flowing IV, use it, push it slow, be patient, and watch how smooth you can induce someone with it.
I'm grateful that I have had at least one attending who lets me use this drug in crani's, and I feel like I'm pretty damn good with it and have a good feel for what it can do. I've never had a surgeon complain, and my brains are always soft when it comes time to do some whackin'. Does it make a huge difference in the longterm outcome? Probably not. But, you can do cookie-cutter anesthesia or you can actually try to have a few more guns in your arsenal. I choose the latter.
-copro
OK, I trained at a time when thiopental was still a main stream induction agent and I probably induced more people with thiopental than you induced with propofol or any induction agent combined, and I can tell you with certainty that it's not as great as you might think, it is less flexible and it causes slower emergence and it is not as easy to titrate as Propofol.
It also (as you obviously know) doesn't mix well with many drugs in the IV line.
So, in short: It's not very good.
I'm not at all suggesting that you use thiopental for every case. But, in certain select cases, especially those where there is some sort of space occupying lesion inside the calvarium, you should give it a try. You don't slam it in like I see a lot of my resident and physician colleauges do with other meds, and probably the standard 5mg/kg induction dose is WAY too liberal and unnecessary. But, have a good fast-flowing IV, use it, push it slow, be patient, and watch how smooth you can induce someone with it.
I'm grateful that I have had at least one attending who lets me use this drug in crani's, and I feel like I'm pretty damn good with it and have a good feel for what it can do. I've never had a surgeon complain, and my brains are always soft when it comes time to do some whackin'. Does it make a huge difference in the longterm outcome? Probably not. But, you can do cookie-cutter anesthesia or you can actually try to have a few more guns in your arsenal. I choose the latter.
No
i asked for some from pharmacy the other day and they sent me penicillin
Dude, you win a huge for even asking for it.
I don't think the benefits in head trauma/surgery are theoretical. It has an excellent side-effect profile, it almost immediately drastically reduces the CMRO2 and does it better than propofol and etomidate, and also provides better cerebral protection than most other agents.
-copro
Just a little additional clarification for "those" who skimmed...
-copro
P.S. More than occassionally when I ready your posts, Plankton, I'm reminded how grateful I am that (A) my residency is coming to an end soon, and (B) I have some great attendings who actually allow people the leeway to try different things barring their own personal experience (dare I say "baggage") with particular techniques.
Who told you that?We stock propofol and STP concurrently here.
STP advantages:
Takes a lot more to knock-down airway reflexes,
Again where did you get that information from?along with respiratory drive, compared with propofol.
Absolutely incorrect.Preserves the baroreceptor reflex. Not as much of a problem with hypotension, especially if pt on ACEi/ARB..
And this can not be done with Propofol?If pt with high ICPs needing a procedure, a good slug can keep you out of trouble. If brain is swollen, slug/infusion of STP can help too. .
I can't figure out why would one use etomidate/propofol mix for induction for crani for tumor resection vs. just propofol. Patient was stable, BP was ok.
[Thiopental] is a great induction agent
We stock propofol and STP concurrently here.
Det: mind sending some articles re:
"Speaking of myths, the concept that protection of neurons by anesthetics during an ischemic event is explained by a reduction in cell metabolism is among my favorites.
Not saying that these agents cant provide neuroprotection, just that decreasing CMRO2 doesn't correlate well with neuronal protection during ischemia."
I think this is a true statement, just wanted to see your literature.
.
We still stock and use pentothal for some crani's and for general C/S.
We use STP for ECT's at my new gig. Why? 'Cuz that's how they do it I guess. In residency we routinely used etomidate or brevital.
STP increases the seizure threshold, are you still getting a good seizure activity?
This is why people always advocated Methohexital for this use but I guess you can use anything.
As usual, I won't make you wait:
THATS SOME STUPIDA SS ACADEMIC ANESTHESIA S HIT.
UNPROVEN.
Waste of time.
OMFG, are there REALLY attendings out there that mix etomidate and propofol thinking they're making a DIFFERENCE in PATIENT OUTCOME?
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHA
We use STP for ECT's at my new gig. Why? 'Cuz that's how they do it I guess. In residency we routinely used etomidate or brevital.
Are you doing a sitting crani?
Otherwise no real benefit, and TEE is even better but I've never seen anyone use TEE for a crani. And if you are going to do a precordial doppler are you also going to place a central line appropriately for VAE?
wow your response has such a great educational value!! Thanks!!