- Joined
- Dec 12, 2003
- Messages
- 1,467
- Reaction score
- 949
Was wondering whether or not the Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) is a composite score and if so what are the individual components and how are they scored?
You could google this you know. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_Assessment_of_FunctioningWas wondering whether or not the Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) is a composite score and if so what are the individual components and how are they scored?
I find the GAF to be totally useless.
I know it is completely useless, but I was just wondering is this a score by itself or are there multiple categories that add up to the composite score
I must admit, I'm not totally comfortable with assigning a GAF score. It just seems unscientific to me and very operator dependent whether to choose 30-35 or 35-40 for instance. What rules do you go by when applying a score?
...likening scoring above 90 to being 'self-actualized' i.e. no one ever gets there except people like Jesus...
i.e. no one ever gets there except people like Jesus, Buddha or in current times the Dalai Lama or Mother Teresa.
Not to start a religious debate, but some people might argue that Jesus was delusional ! The Dalai Lama and Mother Teresa I don't think any one could argue with though.
Reviving this old thread....
Is it true that insurance companies won't pay for the patient's hospitalization if he or she is above a certain GAF? It seems so subjective and kind of useless -- I feel like I could easily give the same patient a 25 or 50. Is there any better strategy or algorithm for assigning these scores?
I like the GAF. As you imply, It's not meant to be super precise or used to deny coverage. It's a birds eye view of how a person is doing overall from a subjective, human standpoint. Its an acknowledgement that human biopsychosocial interactions are complex and not necessarily reducible to a simple algorhythm which could be run on a computer in lieu of careful diagnosis of maladaptive cognitions and behaviors by an experienced clinician over time. The practice of psychiatry might be easier if this were not true. Despite all the various rating scales and treatment protocols, which have their important uses, psychiatry remains as much a human art as a science. Clinicians vary in their ability to accept this.Reviving this old thread....
Is it true that insurance companies won't pay for the patient's hospitalization if he or she is above a certain GAF? It seems so subjective and kind of useless -- I feel like I could easily give the same patient a 25 or 50. Is there any better strategy or algorithm for assigning these scores?