So I'm now a first-year at HMS and happened to come upon this page again as I was reminiscing my pre-med days. It seems that many of you, and rightly so, are concerned about the curricular changes. As a first-year, I have my fair share of complaints about the curriculum, but overall, it is a strong program that is highly innovative. One of the strengths of Harvard is that the curriculum IS dynamic and feedback from students are taken seriously and frequently. In fact, they changed course logistics due to our feedback. Students are highly respected, so if we demand change, it will happen, and it will happen fast. The curriculum this year was not a failure, but they will make changes based on our suggestions this year.
Also, the number of faculty involved in our education is truly amazing...For every course, there are 10-20 lecturers, and then tutorial sessions are led mostly by doctors and leading scientists. Someone also mentioned that HMS does not require students to memorize minute details. This is true. I have really enjoyed my time at HMS because I have not had to spend time memorizing every molecule in textbooks. The emphasis is on problem-solving. Of course, overarching concepts are explained to some degree, but students are self-directed. You learn as much as you want to at that time. People do put substantial amount of work into their courses, and when it comes to the Boards, we do very well.
The "new curriculum" has put a lot of emphasis into social medicine, ethics, and other topics not extensively covered at other medical schools. The tradeoff is that you only have 7 weeks for anatomy (it's true), but I actually liked that it was 7 weeks. I still learned all the parts of the body just as well, and all the concepts are reiterated in physiology and more in second year as well. Regardless of whether anatomy is 7 weeks or 7 months, you will remember all the structures for the Boards.
Hope this post helped.