In all three of the general chemistry classes and all five of the organic chemistry classes that I took at the cc, not one single class had a curve.
Furthermore, as I stated, the class, according to state legislature, teaches to and tests from the exact same material. My professors who taught both at the cc and at the four year school said there was absoultely no difference between the two with the exception of what time of day the classes were offered. So by you saying that the student pool is different, you are wrong. It is the exact same, and by the same token, I am not only getting a grade better that most of my other cc couterparts, but those who also got the same grade, or otherwise, at the four year school.
Not only that, but they would be a hypocrite. If I told them, during their undergrad days that they could take the exact same class, taught by the same professor, just at a different school that cost 25% of what the other school cost, I bet they would have taken that deal. Anyone who says otherwise either likes to spend money just for the hell of it, or is extremely dense.
Now, I understand that not all cc and four year universities have this setup - where classes at the cc are equivalent to the four year schools to the degree in which I speak. However, those who are looking down upon someone taking classes at a cc without knowing that type of information are really making biased judgements because they do not know the facts. Even if it is a question of how rigorous their schedule was at the cc. Im assuming, as in my case, that those who have attended a cc also took a heavy science based curriculum. During my two years of gen chem and organic chem I mixed in thee units of physics, biochemistry, A&P, microbiology, and general biology. Even then, if there was a question as to how much one could have learned at a cc as compared to someone from a four year school, isnt that another way to use the PCAT results?